Safety and efficacy of different basal insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease in Ramadan: prospective observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1186/s12902-024-01778-z
Nur Haziqah Baharum, Sharifah Faradila Wan Muhammad Hatta, Nur Aisyah Zainordin, Rohana Abdul Ghani
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of different basal insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease in Ramadan: prospective observational study.","authors":"Nur Haziqah Baharum, Sharifah Faradila Wan Muhammad Hatta, Nur Aisyah Zainordin, Rohana Abdul Ghani","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01778-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic kidney disease populations are categorized as high risk for fasting in Ramadan due to various potential fasting-related complications. Insulin analogues are recommended to be used in place of human insulin during fasting, as they carry a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and stable glycaemic variability. A paucity of data exits on the safety and efficacy of different basal insulin types during fasting for this population. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three basal insulin among patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and concomitant mild to moderate chronic kidney disease who are keen to fast during Ramadan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-centered, prospective observational study was conducted among 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concomitant chronic kidney disease stage 2 and 3 who were on three different types of basal insulin (Glargine U-100, Levemir, and Insulatard), fasted in Ramadan 2022. All variables were listed as median (IQR). Hypoglycaemia events and glycemic variability obtained from Freestyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring were compared between insulin groups. Changes in glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, renal profile, body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference pre and post-Ramadan were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The glycaemic variability was found highest in Insulatard with a median (IQR) of 37.2(33)% versus Levemir 34.4(32.4)% versus Glargine U-100 36.8(30.6)%, p = NS. Levemir had reported the lowest median time of below range of 2.5(13)% followed by Glargine 4(25)% and Insulatard 5(8)%; p = NS. The findings of this study indicated that glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, renal profile, body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference did not alter statistically between the three groups post-Ramadan. Individually, Insulatard showed a significant reduction in weight and waist circumference (0.9kg, p = 0.026; 0.44 cm, p = 0.008) while Levemir showed a reduction in waist circumference (0.75cm, p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that Insulatard, Levemir, and Glargine demonstrated similar levels of safety and efficacy among those with diabetic kidney disease who observed fasting during Ramadan.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01778-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic kidney disease populations are categorized as high risk for fasting in Ramadan due to various potential fasting-related complications. Insulin analogues are recommended to be used in place of human insulin during fasting, as they carry a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and stable glycaemic variability. A paucity of data exits on the safety and efficacy of different basal insulin types during fasting for this population. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three basal insulin among patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and concomitant mild to moderate chronic kidney disease who are keen to fast during Ramadan.

Materials and methods: A single-centered, prospective observational study was conducted among 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concomitant chronic kidney disease stage 2 and 3 who were on three different types of basal insulin (Glargine U-100, Levemir, and Insulatard), fasted in Ramadan 2022. All variables were listed as median (IQR). Hypoglycaemia events and glycemic variability obtained from Freestyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring were compared between insulin groups. Changes in glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, renal profile, body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference pre and post-Ramadan were evaluated.

Results: The glycaemic variability was found highest in Insulatard with a median (IQR) of 37.2(33)% versus Levemir 34.4(32.4)% versus Glargine U-100 36.8(30.6)%, p = NS. Levemir had reported the lowest median time of below range of 2.5(13)% followed by Glargine 4(25)% and Insulatard 5(8)%; p = NS. The findings of this study indicated that glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, renal profile, body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference did not alter statistically between the three groups post-Ramadan. Individually, Insulatard showed a significant reduction in weight and waist circumference (0.9kg, p = 0.026; 0.44 cm, p = 0.008) while Levemir showed a reduction in waist circumference (0.75cm, p = 0.019).

Conclusion: This study revealed that Insulatard, Levemir, and Glargine demonstrated similar levels of safety and efficacy among those with diabetic kidney disease who observed fasting during Ramadan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斋月期间不同基础胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病合并慢性肾病的安全性和有效性:前瞻性观察研究
背景:由于各种潜在的与禁食相关的并发症,糖尿病肾病人群被归类为斋月禁食的高风险人群。建议在禁食期间使用胰岛素类似物代替人胰岛素,因为它们低血糖的风险较低,血糖变异性稳定。缺乏关于不同基础胰岛素类型在该人群禁食期间的安全性和有效性的数据。本研究旨在评估三种基础胰岛素在2型糖尿病合并轻中度慢性肾病患者斋月期间热衷于禁食的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:对46例2型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏疾病2期和3期患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性观察研究,这些患者在2022年斋月禁食,使用三种不同类型的基础胰岛素(甘精U-100、Levemir和Insulatard)。所有变量均以中位数(IQR)列示。通过Freestyle Libre连续血糖监测获得的低血糖事件和血糖变异性在胰岛素组之间进行比较。评估斋月前后糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、肾功能、体重、体重指数和腰围的变化。结果:Insulatard组血糖变异性最高,中位数(IQR)为37.2(33)%,Levemir组为34.4(32.4)%,甘精U-100组为36.8(30.6)%,p = NS。Levemir报告的中位低于范围时间最低为2.5(13)%,其次是甘精4(25)%和Insulatard 5(8)%;p = NS。本研究的结果表明,在斋月后,三组之间的糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、肾谱、体重、体重指数和腰围在统计学上没有改变。单独来看,Insulatard显示体重和腰围显著减少(0.9kg, p = 0.026;0.44 cm, p = 0.008),而Levemir显示腰围减少(0.75cm, p = 0.019)。结论:本研究表明,在斋月期间禁食的糖尿病肾病患者中,Insulatard、Levemir和甘精显示出相似的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Burden of peripheral artery disease and risk factors among patients with diabetes mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The relationship between hepatic enzymes, prediabetes, and diabetes in the Azar cohort population. Nomogram for predicting the risk of cervical lymph node metastases and recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on the thyroid differentiation score system and clinical characteristics. Gender-specific association between a novel atherogenic index of plasma, metabolic parameters and inflammation among obese adults. Prevalence and predictors of thyroid nodules among adults: analyzing the association with metabolic syndrome in a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1