The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Fusion Rates Following Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001749
Yu Chang, Chih-Yuan Huang, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Kuan-Yu Chi, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin
{"title":"The Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Fusion Rates Following Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.","authors":"Yu Chang, Chih-Yuan Huang, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Kuan-Yu Chi, Junmin Song, Hong-Min Lin","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores how proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affect fusion rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), using a large-scale data analysis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>ACDF is essential for treating cervical disc herniation leading to myelopathy and radiculopathy, involving disc removal and vertebral fusion, crucial for long-term stability and symptom relief. Notably, PPIs, which are commonly prescribed for acid-related disorders, have been linked to altered bone health and healing processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Utilizing the TriNetX network database spanning from 2008 to 2023, we identified patients undergoing single-level ACDF, classified into cohorts based on PPI usage following ACDF. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance demographics and comorbidities between the two groups. The study focused on the incidence of non-fusion, indicated by the International Classification of Disease-10 code M96.0, within 6 months to 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial cohort comprised 1269 PPI users and 23,932 non-users, adjusted to 1266 per group after matching. Postmatching analysis indicated minimal differences in demographics and comorbidities between the cohorts. Our results showed that postoperative PPI users have a significantly higher risk of non-fusion following single-level ACDF surgery at 1 year (odds ratio: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.73) and 2 years (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.11-1.81) follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed a significant link between postoperative PPI use and increased long-term pseudarthrosis risk after ACDF surgery. These findings suggest careful consideration of PPI use in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Cohort study.

Objective: This study explores how proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affect fusion rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), using a large-scale data analysis.

Background: ACDF is essential for treating cervical disc herniation leading to myelopathy and radiculopathy, involving disc removal and vertebral fusion, crucial for long-term stability and symptom relief. Notably, PPIs, which are commonly prescribed for acid-related disorders, have been linked to altered bone health and healing processes.

Materials and methods: Utilizing the TriNetX network database spanning from 2008 to 2023, we identified patients undergoing single-level ACDF, classified into cohorts based on PPI usage following ACDF. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance demographics and comorbidities between the two groups. The study focused on the incidence of non-fusion, indicated by the International Classification of Disease-10 code M96.0, within 6 months to 2 years postoperatively.

Results: The initial cohort comprised 1269 PPI users and 23,932 non-users, adjusted to 1266 per group after matching. Postmatching analysis indicated minimal differences in demographics and comorbidities between the cohorts. Our results showed that postoperative PPI users have a significantly higher risk of non-fusion following single-level ACDF surgery at 1 year (odds ratio: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.73) and 2 years (odds ratio: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.11-1.81) follow-up.

Conclusions: Our study showed a significant link between postoperative PPI use and increased long-term pseudarthrosis risk after ACDF surgery. These findings suggest careful consideration of PPI use in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用质子泵抑制剂对单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术融合后融合率的影响。
研究设计:队列研究。目的:本研究通过大规模数据分析,探讨质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)如何影响颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)后的融合率。背景:ACDF对于治疗导致脊髓病和神经根病的颈椎间盘突出症至关重要,包括椎间盘切除和椎体融合,对于长期稳定性和症状缓解至关重要。值得注意的是,ppi通常用于治疗与酸有关的疾病,它与骨骼健康和愈合过程的改变有关。材料和方法:利用TriNetX网络数据库,从2008年到2023年,我们确定了接受单水平ACDF的患者,根据ACDF后PPI的使用情况分为队列。进行1:1倾向评分匹配,以平衡两组之间的人口统计学和合并症。研究的重点是术后6个月至2年内未融合的发生率,国际疾病分类-10代码M96.0。结果:初始队列包括1269名PPI使用者和23,932名非PPI使用者,匹配后调整为每组1266名。配对后分析显示,两组人群在人口统计学和合并症方面的差异极小。我们的结果显示,在随访1年(优势比:1.35,95% CI: 1.05-1.73)和2年(优势比:1.42,95% CI: 1.11-1.81)时,术后PPI使用者在单节段ACDF手术后发生不融合的风险明显更高。结论:我们的研究显示ACDF术后PPI使用与长期假关节风险增加之间存在显著联系。这些发现提示在这些患者中谨慎考虑使用PPI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Appropriateness and Consistency of an Online Artificial Intelligence System's Response to Common Questions Regarding Cervical Fusion. Ligamentous Augmentation to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Characterization of Lumbar Lordosis: Influence of Age, Sex, Vertebral Body Wedging, and L4-S1. Motion Capture-based 3-Dimensional Measurement of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Cervical Laminoplasty. Stopping at C2 Versus C3/4 in Elective Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1