Resting-state brain functional connectivity in patients with chronic intractable pain who respond to spinal cord stimulation therapy

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.011
Kyohei Ueno , Yoshitetsu Oshiro , Shigeyuki Kan , Yuki Nomura , Hitoaki Satou , Norihiko Obata , Satoshi Mizobuchi
{"title":"Resting-state brain functional connectivity in patients with chronic intractable pain who respond to spinal cord stimulation therapy","authors":"Kyohei Ueno ,&nbsp;Yoshitetsu Oshiro ,&nbsp;Shigeyuki Kan ,&nbsp;Yuki Nomura ,&nbsp;Hitoaki Satou ,&nbsp;Norihiko Obata ,&nbsp;Satoshi Mizobuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely accepted as a useful treatment for patients with intractable chronic pain. However, its effectiveness varies between individuals. Therefore, a tool for evaluating its effectiveness in advance is eagerly awaited. We examined whether resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic and prognostic tool can predict responsiveness to SCS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-nine patients with intractable chronic pain participated in this study. Participants were divided into responder and non-responder groups based on a pain relief rate after SCS trials. All participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans before the SCS trials. We searched for functional connectivity that differed significantly in strength between the two groups and was correlated with pain relief rate. We conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a one-sample proportion test to determine the cut-off value and evaluate the predictive power of the functional connectivity-based prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 14 and 15 participants were assigned to the responder and non-responder groups, respectively. Functional connectivity between the middle anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex showed significant between-group differences and a significant negative correlation with the pain relief rate. Moreover, this functional connectivity could accurately predict SCS responsiveness greater than chance (sensitivity: 71%; specificity: 87%; area under the curve: 0.814; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For patients with intractable chronic pain, functional connectivity between the middle anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex is a promising candidate biomarker to estimate responsiveness to spinal cord stimulation before treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 2","pages":"Pages 492-500"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224006135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely accepted as a useful treatment for patients with intractable chronic pain. However, its effectiveness varies between individuals. Therefore, a tool for evaluating its effectiveness in advance is eagerly awaited. We examined whether resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic and prognostic tool can predict responsiveness to SCS.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with intractable chronic pain participated in this study. Participants were divided into responder and non-responder groups based on a pain relief rate after SCS trials. All participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans before the SCS trials. We searched for functional connectivity that differed significantly in strength between the two groups and was correlated with pain relief rate. We conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and a one-sample proportion test to determine the cut-off value and evaluate the predictive power of the functional connectivity-based prediction model.

Results

In total, 14 and 15 participants were assigned to the responder and non-responder groups, respectively. Functional connectivity between the middle anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex showed significant between-group differences and a significant negative correlation with the pain relief rate. Moreover, this functional connectivity could accurately predict SCS responsiveness greater than chance (sensitivity: 71%; specificity: 87%; area under the curve: 0.814; P<0.001).

Conclusions

For patients with intractable chronic pain, functional connectivity between the middle anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex is a promising candidate biomarker to estimate responsiveness to spinal cord stimulation before treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对脊髓刺激治疗有反应的慢性难治性疼痛患者的静息状态脑功能连通性。
背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)被广泛认为是治疗顽固性慢性疼痛的有效方法。然而,它的有效性因人而异。因此,迫切需要一种工具来提前评估其有效性。我们研究了静息状态功能磁共振成像作为诊断和预后工具是否可以预测对SCS的反应性。方法:对29例顽固性慢性疼痛患者进行研究。根据SCS试验后疼痛缓解率将参与者分为有反应组和无反应组。所有参与者在SCS试验前都进行了静息状态功能磁共振成像扫描。我们寻找两组之间在强度上有显著差异的功能连通性,并与疼痛缓解率相关。我们进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和单样本比例检验,以确定截止值并评估基于功能连接的预测模型的预测能力。结果:共有14名和15名参与者分别被分配到应答组和非应答组。前扣带皮层中部和楔前叶/后扣带皮层功能连通性组间差异显著,且与疼痛缓解率呈显著负相关。此外,这种功能连通性可以比随机更准确地预测SCS的反应性(灵敏度:71%;特异性:87%;曲线下面积:0.814;结论:对于顽固性慢性疼痛患者,在治疗前评估脊髓刺激反应性时,中前扣带皮层和楔前叶/后扣带皮层之间的功能连通性是一个有希望的候选生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
The treat while you wait initiative: a pilot project on turning surgical waiting lists into preparation lists. Evaluation of AI-based nerve segmentation on ultrasound: relevance of standard metrics in the clinical setting. Effect of midazolam co-administered with oxycodone on ventilation: a randomised clinical trial in healthy volunteers. Does titration of anaesthesia using population-derived EEG indices overdose older patients? A single-centre analysis of the sustainability and acceptance of actions to reduce the carbon footprint of anaesthesia practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1