Post-Stroke Osteoporosis Screening: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cerebrovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1159/000542924
Sydney Knight, Rachel Swance, Emma A Bateman, Kristin K Clemens, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jamie L Fleet
{"title":"Post-Stroke Osteoporosis Screening: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sydney Knight, Rachel Swance, Emma A Bateman, Kristin K Clemens, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jamie L Fleet","doi":"10.1159/000542924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are no specific screening recommendations for post-stroke osteoporosis despite evidence that people post-stroke are at heightened risk of fragility fractures. Our objective was to explore the extent of evidence and map the current literature available for osteoporosis screening in the post-stroke population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review searched for articles in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases published in English before May 2024, involving osteoporosis screening for adults after stroke. Title and abstract screening as well as full-text review and data extraction was performed by two reviewers. Analysis of the studies is descriptive and narrative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight articles met inclusion criteria: five published articles and three peer-reviewed conference abstracts. Three study designs were utilized: four cross-sectional studies, three cohort studies, and one survey. Four studies investigated post-stroke osteoporosis screening rates, two looked at screening pathways for post-stroke osteoporosis, and two assessed novel osteoporosis screening tools. No post-stroke osteoporosis screening guidelines were found. Across all included studies, reported screening rates for post-stroke osteoporosis were less than 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review emphasizes the need for osteoporosis screening guidelines and risk assessment tools specific to the post-stroke population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are no specific screening recommendations for post-stroke osteoporosis despite evidence that people post-stroke are at heightened risk of fragility fractures. Our objective was to explore the extent of evidence and map the current literature available for osteoporosis screening in the post-stroke population.

Methods: This scoping review searched for articles in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases published in English before May 2024, involving osteoporosis screening for adults after stroke. Title and abstract screening as well as full-text review and data extraction was performed by two reviewers. Analysis of the studies is descriptive and narrative.

Results: Eight articles met inclusion criteria: five published articles and three peer-reviewed conference abstracts. Three study designs were utilized: four cross-sectional studies, three cohort studies, and one survey. Four studies investigated post-stroke osteoporosis screening rates, two looked at screening pathways for post-stroke osteoporosis, and two assessed novel osteoporosis screening tools. No post-stroke osteoporosis screening guidelines were found. Across all included studies, reported screening rates for post-stroke osteoporosis were less than 10%.

Conclusions: This scoping review emphasizes the need for osteoporosis screening guidelines and risk assessment tools specific to the post-stroke population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卒中后骨质疏松筛查:范围综述。
尽管有证据表明卒中后骨质疏松症患者脆性骨折的风险增加,但目前还没有针对卒中后骨质疏松症的具体筛查建议。我们的目的是探索证据的范围,并绘制目前可用于卒中后人群骨质疏松筛查的文献。方法:本综述检索Medline, Embase和CINAHL数据库中2024年5月前发表的英文文章,涉及成人卒中后骨质疏松症筛查。标题和摘要筛选、全文审查和数据提取由两名审稿人完成。研究的分析是描述性和叙述性的。结果:8篇文章符合纳入标准:5篇已发表文章和3篇同行评议的会议摘要。采用了三种研究设计:四项横断面研究,三项队列研究和一项调查。四项研究调查了中风后骨质疏松症的筛查率,两项研究了中风后骨质疏松症的筛查途径,两项研究评估了新的骨质疏松症筛查工具。未发现卒中后骨质疏松筛查指南。在所有纳入的研究中,卒中后骨质疏松症的筛查率低于10%。结论:本综述强调需要针对卒中后人群制定骨质疏松筛查指南和风险评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
期刊最新文献
A nationwide prospective registry of endovascular thrombectomy for extra-large ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (XL STROKE): rationale and design. Effect of Acupuncture on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. The prediction of hematoma growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: from 2-dimensional shape to 3-dimensional morphology. Bridging Thrombolysis versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in acute Basilar artery occlusion due to different stroke etiologies. Detecting atrial fibrillation by artificial intelligence enabled neuroimaging examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1