Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical properties of swollen rabbit corneas.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Experimental eye research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2024.110191
LingQiao Li, Han Bao, ErChi Zhang, ShuTing Wu, XiaoYang Jiang, YuJia Xiao, ShiJing Fan, YiXin Luo, YunYun Huang, Pei Zhang, Michael Swain, Ahmed Elsheikh, ShiHao Chen, XiaoBo Zheng
{"title":"Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical properties of swollen rabbit corneas.","authors":"LingQiao Li, Han Bao, ErChi Zhang, ShuTing Wu, XiaoYang Jiang, YuJia Xiao, ShiJing Fan, YiXin Luo, YunYun Huang, Pei Zhang, Michael Swain, Ahmed Elsheikh, ShiHao Chen, XiaoBo Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.exer.2024.110191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method to prevent the progression of keratoconus. CXL combined with hypotonic riboflavin solution is a modified treatment for thin corneas, which are deemed to be below the safe thickness threshold. In this study, rabbit corneas were subjected to different hydration levels using different osmolarity of riboflavin dextran solutions before CXL. Inflation testing was performed to evaluate the corneal biomechanical stiffening effect of hypotonic riboflavin solutions crosslinking. One-month post-CXL, the stromal demarcation line depth (DLD) and the biomechanical property parameter - tangent modulus (Et) - were measured. All CXL groups showed higher Et than the corresponding Ctrl groups (all P < 0.001), however, the Et values showed no statistical differences between the CXL-ed groups with different hydration levels (all P > 0.05). The relative depth ratio of DLD to total corneal thickness (TCT) did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), while the DLD was statistically different in three CXL groups (P < 0.001). The research suggested that riboflavin solutions with different osmolarities are suitable for preoperative swelling of corneas with different thickness ranges. Furthermore, crosslinking with hypotonic riboflavin solutions has no significant effect on corneal biomechanical improvement under a certain degree of hydration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12177,"journal":{"name":"Experimental eye research","volume":" ","pages":"110191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental eye research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2024.110191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method to prevent the progression of keratoconus. CXL combined with hypotonic riboflavin solution is a modified treatment for thin corneas, which are deemed to be below the safe thickness threshold. In this study, rabbit corneas were subjected to different hydration levels using different osmolarity of riboflavin dextran solutions before CXL. Inflation testing was performed to evaluate the corneal biomechanical stiffening effect of hypotonic riboflavin solutions crosslinking. One-month post-CXL, the stromal demarcation line depth (DLD) and the biomechanical property parameter - tangent modulus (Et) - were measured. All CXL groups showed higher Et than the corresponding Ctrl groups (all P < 0.001), however, the Et values showed no statistical differences between the CXL-ed groups with different hydration levels (all P > 0.05). The relative depth ratio of DLD to total corneal thickness (TCT) did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), while the DLD was statistically different in three CXL groups (P < 0.001). The research suggested that riboflavin solutions with different osmolarities are suitable for preoperative swelling of corneas with different thickness ranges. Furthermore, crosslinking with hypotonic riboflavin solutions has no significant effect on corneal biomechanical improvement under a certain degree of hydration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角膜交联对兔角膜肿胀生物力学性能的影响。
角膜交联(CXL)是预防圆锥角膜发展的有效方法。CXL联合低渗核黄素溶液是一种针对薄角膜的改良治疗方法,薄角膜被认为低于安全厚度阈值。在本研究中,使用不同渗透压的核黄素葡聚糖溶液对兔角膜进行了不同水化水平的治疗。采用充气试验评价低渗核黄素交联后角膜生物力学硬化效果。术后1个月,测量基质分界线深度(DLD)和生物力学性能参数切模量(Et)。所有CXL组的Et值均高于相应的对照组(P < 0.001),但不同水合水平CXL-ed组之间Et值无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。DLD与角膜总厚度(TCT)的相对深度比差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),而3个CXL组的DLD差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。研究提示,不同渗透压的核黄素溶液适用于不同厚度范围角膜的术前肿胀。在一定水化程度下,低渗核黄素交联对角膜生物力学改善无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental eye research
Experimental eye research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
323
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The primary goal of Experimental Eye Research is to publish original research papers on all aspects of experimental biology of the eye and ocular tissues that seek to define the mechanisms of normal function and/or disease. Studies of ocular tissues that encompass the disciplines of cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, molecular biology, physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, immunology or microbiology are most welcomed. Manuscripts that are purely clinical or in a surgical area of ophthalmology are not appropriate for submission to Experimental Eye Research and if received will be returned without review.
期刊最新文献
Establishment and evaluation of rabbit model for corneal ectasia by photorefractive keratectomy. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of rat iridocorneal angle at perinatal stages: revisiting the development of periocular mesenchyme. Priming and release of cytokine IL-1β in microglial cells from the retina. Screening of a retinal-targeting Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) via DNA shuffling. TAT-N24 enhances retinal ganglion cell survival by suppressing ZBP1-PANoptosome-mediated PANoptosis in an acute glaucoma mouse model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1