Increased consumption of cardiovascular drugs under volume-based procurement (VBP) policy: demand release or assessment inducing?

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3
Ying Yang, Jieming Zhang, Yuanhui Duan, Lei Zhou, Sisheng Gan, Zongfu Mao, Shaotang Wu, Furong Wang
{"title":"Increased consumption of cardiovascular drugs under volume-based procurement (VBP) policy: demand release or assessment inducing?","authors":"Ying Yang, Jieming Zhang, Yuanhui Duan, Lei Zhou, Sisheng Gan, Zongfu Mao, Shaotang Wu, Furong Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The phenomenon of growth in drug consumption within the framework of national volume-based procurement (VBP) policy raises speculations about demand release and policy inducing. This study aims to explore the reasons and mechanisms of drug consumption increases following VBP policy from two perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform, National Bureau of Statistics and the Joint Procurement Office. Twenty cardiovascular international non-proprietary names (INNs) in the first three VBP batches and 28 observation regions were included, constructing 418 valid INN-region combinations as the unit for analysis. The average monthly consumption volume of VBP cardiovascular drug was assigned as the explained variable. The generalized difference-in-difference method was conducted using the price reduction level and the size of policy assessment task as the policy intensity indicator. Moderating effect model was employed to examine the role of resident's income level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased cardiovascular drug consumption was observed in 285 (68.18%) INN-region combinations after policy implementation. Under VBP policy, the price reduction level was significantly correlated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.144, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (all p-values < 0.05). Resident's income level negatively moderated the impact of price reduction level on drug consumption in total (β = -0.089, p < 0.001) and in secondary hospitals (β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and PHCs (β = -0.2.9, p < 0.001), rather than in tertiary hospitals (β = -0.079, p > 0.05). The size of policy assessment task was positively associated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.052, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and PHCs (all p-values < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two mechanisms codrive drug consumption increases under VBP policy: first is the improvement of cardiovascular medication access and consumption toward lower-income groups following price reduction, pointing to the fulfillment of unmet needs, and second is policy pressure from supporting assessment measures on hospital drug use, indicating potential overprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01250-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The phenomenon of growth in drug consumption within the framework of national volume-based procurement (VBP) policy raises speculations about demand release and policy inducing. This study aims to explore the reasons and mechanisms of drug consumption increases following VBP policy from two perspectives.

Methods: We collected data from the China Drug Supply Information Platform, National Bureau of Statistics and the Joint Procurement Office. Twenty cardiovascular international non-proprietary names (INNs) in the first three VBP batches and 28 observation regions were included, constructing 418 valid INN-region combinations as the unit for analysis. The average monthly consumption volume of VBP cardiovascular drug was assigned as the explained variable. The generalized difference-in-difference method was conducted using the price reduction level and the size of policy assessment task as the policy intensity indicator. Moderating effect model was employed to examine the role of resident's income level.

Results: Increased cardiovascular drug consumption was observed in 285 (68.18%) INN-region combinations after policy implementation. Under VBP policy, the price reduction level was significantly correlated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.144, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (all p-values < 0.05). Resident's income level negatively moderated the impact of price reduction level on drug consumption in total (β = -0.089, p < 0.001) and in secondary hospitals (β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and PHCs (β = -0.2.9, p < 0.001), rather than in tertiary hospitals (β = -0.079, p > 0.05). The size of policy assessment task was positively associated with drug consumption in total (β = 0.052, p < 0.001), as well as in tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals and PHCs (all p-values < 0.05).

Conclusions: Two mechanisms codrive drug consumption increases under VBP policy: first is the improvement of cardiovascular medication access and consumption toward lower-income groups following price reduction, pointing to the fulfillment of unmet needs, and second is policy pressure from supporting assessment measures on hospital drug use, indicating potential overprescribing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按量采购(VBP)政策下心血管药物消费增加:需求释放还是评估诱导?
背景:在国家按量采购(VBP)政策框架内药物消费增长的现象引发了对需求释放和政策诱导的猜测。本研究旨在从两个角度探讨VBP政策后药物消费增加的原因和机制。方法:从中国药品供应信息平台、国家统计局和联合采购办公室收集数据。纳入前三个VBP批次的20个心血管国际非专利名称(inn)和28个观测区域,构建418个有效的inn区域组合作为分析单元。将VBP心血管药物的月平均用量作为解释变量。采用价格降低水平和政策评估任务规模作为政策强度指标,采用广义差中差法。采用调节效应模型考察了居民收入水平的调节作用。结果:政策实施后,285例(68.18%)inn地区联合用药增加。在VBP政策下,降价幅度与总药品消费量显著相关(β = 0.144, p 0.05)。结论:VBP政策下药品消费增加的共同驱动机制有两种:一是降价后心血管用药可及性和低收入人群用药可及性的改善,表明未满足的需求得到了满足;二是来自医院用药配套评估措施的政策压力,表明可能存在过量处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
Early career research capacity-building for the health and social care workforce: process evaluation of internships and fellowships provided through a research-practice partnership. Rapid expansion of the Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program across 124 districts in India, 2021-2023. Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases in India: national challenges and implications for global health policies. The use of research evidence in blood collection policy and practice: a qualitative study with frontline staff, middle managers and senior managers. How do clinical networks operationalize safety and quality stewardship? A qualitative study of Australian clinical networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1