Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio
{"title":"Validated questionnaires for the assessment of Italian patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions: a systematic review.","authors":"Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio","doi":"10.1159/000542409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs) have a complex, multifactorial pathophysiology that impacts women's health and must be identified to provide the most appropriate care and treatment. Therefore, symptom and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, briefly identified as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), have been developed. Despite the large number of questionnaires available for the assessment of PFDs and QoL-related issues in English, few of them have been validated for the Italian language.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature on Italian-language validated PROs for PFDs assessment, along with practical information on literature references and suggestions on how to obtain each individual questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed up to 1 March 2024. PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were used to identify validated questionnaires in Italian language for PFDs. Once identified, the possibility of obtaining a copy of the questionnaire was checked, and the steps to obtain one are given in the text.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on Lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more Italian PRO validation papers than the previous review. Specifically, the newly validated PROs include: Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire, Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and outlook: </strong>This systematic review is intended to be a tool to promote the adoption of appropriate PROs when studying PFDs in Italian patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs) have a complex, multifactorial pathophysiology that impacts women's health and must be identified to provide the most appropriate care and treatment. Therefore, symptom and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, briefly identified as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), have been developed. Despite the large number of questionnaires available for the assessment of PFDs and QoL-related issues in English, few of them have been validated for the Italian language.
Objectives: The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature on Italian-language validated PROs for PFDs assessment, along with practical information on literature references and suggestions on how to obtain each individual questionnaire.
Methods: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed up to 1 March 2024. PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were used to identify validated questionnaires in Italian language for PFDs. Once identified, the possibility of obtaining a copy of the questionnaire was checked, and the steps to obtain one are given in the text.
Outcome: Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on Lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more Italian PRO validation papers than the previous review. Specifically, the newly validated PROs include: Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire, Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT).
Conclusions and outlook: This systematic review is intended to be a tool to promote the adoption of appropriate PROs when studying PFDs in Italian patients.
期刊介绍:
This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.