Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage Combined with Blood Biomarkers Predicts Poor Wound Healing After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S487967
Zixiang Pang, Yangqin Ou, Jiawei Liang, Shengbin Huang, Jiayi Chen, Shengsheng Huang, Qian Wei, Yuzhen Liu, Hongyuan Qin, Yuanming Chen
{"title":"Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage Combined with Blood Biomarkers Predicts Poor Wound Healing After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning Analysis.","authors":"Zixiang Pang, Yangqin Ou, Jiawei Liang, Shengbin Huang, Jiayi Chen, Shengsheng Huang, Qian Wei, Yuzhen Liu, Hongyuan Qin, Yuanming Chen","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S487967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for poor wound healing (PWH) after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Currently, there is limited research on the application of machine learning in analyzing PWH after spinal surgery. Thus, our primary aim is to using machine learning identify these risk factors and construct a clinical risk prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 2516 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion at Guangxi Medical University's Second Affiliated Hospital between August 2021 and August 2023. The data was divided into test and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. In the test group, logistic regression analysis, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), XGboost, Naïve Bayes (NB), k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) were used to identify specific variables. The top six models from the eight machine learning models with the highest area under curve (AUC) values were selected and used to construct a dynamic nomograms model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. The model's internal performance was then verified in the validation group using ROC and calibration curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 2516 patients were collected, with 411 eligible cases selected. By combining logistic regression analysis with six machine learning algorithms, this study identified six predictors associated with PWH: subcutaneous lumbar spine index(SLSI), albumin, postoperative glucose, cerebrospinal fluid leakage(CSFL), neutrophil (NEU), and C-reactive protein(CRP). These predictors were used to develop a prediction model, visually represented through a nomogram. The AUC value in the test group was 0.981, and the C-index of the model was 0.986 (95% CI 0.966-0.995), indicating excellent predictive capability. Calibration curve analysis showed good consistency between nomogram-predicted values and actual measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLSI, albumin, postoperative glucose, CSFL, NEU and CRP were identified as significant risk factors for PWH after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The developed prediction model exhibited excellent predictive accuracy and usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"5479-5491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S487967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for poor wound healing (PWH) after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Currently, there is limited research on the application of machine learning in analyzing PWH after spinal surgery. Thus, our primary aim is to using machine learning identify these risk factors and construct a clinical risk prediction model.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 2516 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion at Guangxi Medical University's Second Affiliated Hospital between August 2021 and August 2023. The data was divided into test and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. In the test group, logistic regression analysis, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), XGboost, Naïve Bayes (NB), k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) were used to identify specific variables. The top six models from the eight machine learning models with the highest area under curve (AUC) values were selected and used to construct a dynamic nomograms model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. The model's internal performance was then verified in the validation group using ROC and calibration curves.

Results: Data from 2516 patients were collected, with 411 eligible cases selected. By combining logistic regression analysis with six machine learning algorithms, this study identified six predictors associated with PWH: subcutaneous lumbar spine index(SLSI), albumin, postoperative glucose, cerebrospinal fluid leakage(CSFL), neutrophil (NEU), and C-reactive protein(CRP). These predictors were used to develop a prediction model, visually represented through a nomogram. The AUC value in the test group was 0.981, and the C-index of the model was 0.986 (95% CI 0.966-0.995), indicating excellent predictive capability. Calibration curve analysis showed good consistency between nomogram-predicted values and actual measurements.

Conclusion: SLSI, albumin, postoperative glucose, CSFL, NEU and CRP were identified as significant risk factors for PWH after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The developed prediction model exhibited excellent predictive accuracy and usefulness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Combination of White Matter Hyperintensity and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Short-Term Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Prognostic Value of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Effect of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Ability to Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Integrative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Profiling of Symptomatic Accessory Navicular Bone Based on Tandem Mass Tag Technology. C-X-C Motif Chemokine 12 Was Identified as a Potential Gene Target in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1