Correlation of Circulating Complement Levels with Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S483571
Guangjiang Wang, Yuan Guo
{"title":"Correlation of Circulating Complement Levels with Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.","authors":"Guangjiang Wang, Yuan Guo","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S483571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). The complement system maintains the normal physiologic microenvironment of the retina. The relationship between serum complement levels and clinical features of DR remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical characteristics of 252 patients with T2DM including 101 with non-DR (NDR), 79 with nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 72 with proliferative DR (PDR) were prospectively analyzed. Serum complement levels were compared between NDR and DR patients. The correlation between clinical characteristics and complement levels in DR patients was analyzed. A multifactorial logistic analysis was constructed to predict the risk of developing DR in T2DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum C4, CFB, CFI, C3 and C5 levels were higher in DR patients than in NDR patients (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). In T2DM patients, C3 and C4 levels were higher in PDR patients than in DR patients (all <i>P</i> < 0.05), and MBL levels were not statistically different between the two cohorts (<i>P</i> > 0.05). These complement components or fragments were positively correlated with the duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and triglycerides (TG) (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). C3, C5, the duration of diabetes, HbA1c, and TG were the independent risk factors for DR in T2DM patients. The ROC model showed good value for predicting the risk of developing DR in T2DM with an area under the curve of 0.887.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum complements C3 and C5 are predictive factors for DR in patients with T2DM. The prediction model constructed by the clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM and complement can better distinguish between NDR and DR, and can be used as a potential biomarker for assessing the risk of developing DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"5581-5591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S483571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). The complement system maintains the normal physiologic microenvironment of the retina. The relationship between serum complement levels and clinical features of DR remains unclear.

Methods: Clinical characteristics of 252 patients with T2DM including 101 with non-DR (NDR), 79 with nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 72 with proliferative DR (PDR) were prospectively analyzed. Serum complement levels were compared between NDR and DR patients. The correlation between clinical characteristics and complement levels in DR patients was analyzed. A multifactorial logistic analysis was constructed to predict the risk of developing DR in T2DM.

Results: Serum C4, CFB, CFI, C3 and C5 levels were higher in DR patients than in NDR patients (all P < 0.05). In T2DM patients, C3 and C4 levels were higher in PDR patients than in DR patients (all P < 0.05), and MBL levels were not statistically different between the two cohorts (P > 0.05). These complement components or fragments were positively correlated with the duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and triglycerides (TG) (all P < 0.05). C3, C5, the duration of diabetes, HbA1c, and TG were the independent risk factors for DR in T2DM patients. The ROC model showed good value for predicting the risk of developing DR in T2DM with an area under the curve of 0.887.

Conclusion: Serum complements C3 and C5 are predictive factors for DR in patients with T2DM. The prediction model constructed by the clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM and complement can better distinguish between NDR and DR, and can be used as a potential biomarker for assessing the risk of developing DR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环补体水平与糖尿病视网膜病变患者临床特征的相关性
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)相关。补体系统维持视网膜正常的生理微环境。血清补体水平与DR临床特征之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:前瞻性分析252例T2DM患者的临床特征,其中非DR (NDR) 101例,非增殖性DR (NPDR) 79例,增殖性DR (PDR) 72例。比较NDR和DR患者的血清补体水平。分析DR患者临床特征与补体水平的相关性。采用多因素logistic分析预测T2DM患者发生DR的风险。结果:DR患者血清C4、CFB、CFI、C3、C5水平高于NDR患者(均P < 0.05)。T2DM患者中,PDR患者C3、C4水平高于DR患者(均P < 0.05),两组间MBL水平无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。这些补体成分或片段与糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)呈正相关(均P < 0.05)。C3、C5、糖尿病病程、HbA1c、TG是T2DM患者发生DR的独立危险因素。ROC模型对T2DM患者发生DR风险的预测价值较好,曲线下面积为0.887。结论:血清补体C3和C5是T2DM患者发生DR的预测因素。由T2DM患者的临床特征和补体构建的预测模型可以更好地区分NDR和DR,可以作为评估DR发生风险的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Practice and Barriers to Exercise Rehabilitation Among Chinese Patients with Acute Musculoskeletal Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study [Letter]. A Five-Gene PANoptosis Signature Correlates with Immune Infiltration and Secondary Brain Injury in Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Seasonal Variation in the Onset of Acute Cerebral Infarction and Its Association with Clinical Severity and Risk Factors: A Five-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study. Eosinophilic Heart Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management - A Narrative Review. Integration of 2D Speckle Tracking Strain and Clinical Indicators for Early Prediction of Post-PCI Heart Failure in Patients with STEMI and Type 2 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1