Combining moderate dosage of Bevacizumab with TAS-102 provides longer progression-free time in refractory metastatic colorectal Cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04767-9
Kuan-Yu Tseng, Mu-Ying Yang, Wei-Shone Chen, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Huann-Sheng Wang, Shih-Ching Chang, Yuan-Tzu Lan, Chun-Chi Lin, Hung-Hsin Lin, Sheng-Chieh Huang, Hou-Hsuan Cheng, Yi-Wen Yang, Yu-Zu Lin, Che-Yuan Chang, Hao-Wei Teng
{"title":"Combining moderate dosage of Bevacizumab with TAS-102 provides longer progression-free time in refractory metastatic colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Kuan-Yu Tseng, Mu-Ying Yang, Wei-Shone Chen, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Huann-Sheng Wang, Shih-Ching Chang, Yuan-Tzu Lan, Chun-Chi Lin, Hung-Hsin Lin, Sheng-Chieh Huang, Hou-Hsuan Cheng, Yi-Wen Yang, Yu-Zu Lin, Che-Yuan Chang, Hao-Wei Teng","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04767-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of moderate doses of bevacizumab in combination with TAS-102 for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 261 patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled and categorized into two groups: TAS-102 combined with bevacizumab and TAS-102 alone. Patients in the bevacizumab combination group were divided into two subgroups based on a median dose of 3.3 mg/kg. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were assessed using the t-test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust covariates. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Specific survival was evaluated using restricted mean survival time (RMST) and landmark analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months in the TAS-102 combined with the bevacizumab group and 2.2 months in the non-bevacizumab group, showing significance in favor of the bevacizumab combination. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab combination group and 10.3 months in the group that did not receive combination therapy. A survival benefit was observed within 9.5 months in both the RMST and landmark analyses. The PFS benefit was consistent across different doses of bevacizumab, while no significant difference in OS was observed compared to TAS-102 monotherapy. Both PFS and OS did not significantly differ between the different doses of bevacizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate doses of bevacizumab and TAS-102 provided satisfactory efficacy over the standard dose within a limited timeframe of 9.5 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04767-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of moderate doses of bevacizumab in combination with TAS-102 for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 261 patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled and categorized into two groups: TAS-102 combined with bevacizumab and TAS-102 alone. Patients in the bevacizumab combination group were divided into two subgroups based on a median dose of 3.3 mg/kg. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were assessed using the t-test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust covariates. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Specific survival was evaluated using restricted mean survival time (RMST) and landmark analysis.

Result: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months in the TAS-102 combined with the bevacizumab group and 2.2 months in the non-bevacizumab group, showing significance in favor of the bevacizumab combination. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab combination group and 10.3 months in the group that did not receive combination therapy. A survival benefit was observed within 9.5 months in both the RMST and landmark analyses. The PFS benefit was consistent across different doses of bevacizumab, while no significant difference in OS was observed compared to TAS-102 monotherapy. Both PFS and OS did not significantly differ between the different doses of bevacizumab.

Conclusion: Moderate doses of bevacizumab and TAS-102 provided satisfactory efficacy over the standard dose within a limited timeframe of 9.5 months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中等剂量贝伐单抗联合TAS-102治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌可延长无进展时间。
目的:我们旨在评估中等剂量贝伐单抗联合TAS-102治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌的疗效。方法:共纳入261例难治性mCRC患者,分为两组:TAS-102联合贝伐单抗组和TAS-102单独组。贝伐单抗联合组的患者根据中位剂量3.3 mg/kg分为两个亚组。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较,连续变量采用t检验进行评估。采用Cox比例风险模型调整协变量。采用log-rank检验和Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析。使用限制平均生存时间(RMST)和里程碑分析评估特定生存期。结果:TAS-102联合贝伐单抗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.7个月,非贝伐单抗组的中位PFS为2.2个月,具有贝伐单抗联合的显著优势。贝伐单抗联合组的中位总生存期(OS)为9.4个月,未接受联合治疗组的中位总生存期为10.3个月。在RMST和里程碑分析中,在9.5个月内观察到生存获益。不同剂量贝伐单抗的PFS获益是一致的,而与TAS-102单药治疗相比,OS没有显著差异。不同剂量贝伐单抗的PFS和OS均无显著差异。结论:与标准剂量相比,中等剂量贝伐单抗和TAS-102在9.5个月的有限时间内提供了令人满意的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of a clinical activity index in comparison to frequently measured laboratory values in inflammatory bowel disease. Efficacy and safety of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Global burden of colorectal cancer attributable to metabolic risks from 1990 to 2021, with projections of mortality to 2035. Dissecting the rising tide of inflammatory bowel disease among youth in a changing world: insights from GBD 2021. Timing and morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after rectal cancer resection: a prospective observational multicentre snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1