Comparison of early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery before and after ERAS® implementation-a single center three-armed cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04770-0
Katharina Knab, Leon Aurnhammer, Sylvia Büttner, Steffen Seyfried, Florian Herrle, Christoph Reissfelder, Georgi Vassilev, Julia Hardt
{"title":"Comparison of early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery before and after ERAS® implementation-a single center three-armed cohort study.","authors":"Katharina Knab, Leon Aurnhammer, Sylvia Büttner, Steffen Seyfried, Florian Herrle, Christoph Reissfelder, Georgi Vassilev, Julia Hardt","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04770-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) on patient recovery after elective colorectal surgery. The innovative PostopQRS™ tool was used for the analysis of patient recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study compares three cohorts: two retrospective cohorts before (A) and after (B) ERAS® implementation and a prospective cohort post-ERAS® implementation (C) using PostopQRS™. The present study was prospectively registered in the German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00026903).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 patients were included from June 2020 to February 2022. Significant differences were observed in bowel function, oral food intake, opioid use, and PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) occurrence. By the day of discharge, 98% in cohorts B and C had bowel movements or stoma output, compared to 66% in cohort A (p < 0.001). Solid food intake on POD1 was higher in cohorts B and C (p = 0.025), while opioid use was lower (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Cohort C showed 90% recovery on discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates improved early mobility, reduced need for opioids, a higher rate of patients with solid food intake on POD1, and earlier bowel movement as well as excellent recovery following the colorectal ERAS® implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04770-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) on patient recovery after elective colorectal surgery. The innovative PostopQRS™ tool was used for the analysis of patient recovery.

Methods: This single-center study compares three cohorts: two retrospective cohorts before (A) and after (B) ERAS® implementation and a prospective cohort post-ERAS® implementation (C) using PostopQRS™. The present study was prospectively registered in the German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00026903).

Results: A total of 153 patients were included from June 2020 to February 2022. Significant differences were observed in bowel function, oral food intake, opioid use, and PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) occurrence. By the day of discharge, 98% in cohorts B and C had bowel movements or stoma output, compared to 66% in cohort A (p < 0.001). Solid food intake on POD1 was higher in cohorts B and C (p = 0.025), while opioid use was lower (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Cohort C showed 90% recovery on discharge.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates improved early mobility, reduced need for opioids, a higher rate of patients with solid food intake on POD1, and earlier bowel movement as well as excellent recovery following the colorectal ERAS® implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ERAS®实施前后择期结肠手术患者早期术后恢复的比较——一项单中心三臂队列研究
目的:本研究探讨ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery)对择期结肠直肠癌术后患者康复的影响。创新的PostopQRS™工具用于分析患者的恢复情况。方法:这项单中心研究比较了三个队列:两个ERAS®实施之前(A)和之后(B)的回顾性队列,以及一个使用PostopQRS™实施ERAS®后的前瞻性队列。本研究已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00026903)前瞻性注册。结果:2020年6月至2022年2月共纳入153例患者。在肠功能、口服食物摄入、阿片类药物使用和PONV(术后恶心和呕吐)发生率方面观察到显著差异。到出院当天,B组和C组中98%的患者有排便或造口输出,而A组为66% (p)。结论:本研究表明,患者早期活动能力改善,阿片类药物需求减少,POD1时摄入固体食物的患者比例更高,排便时间更早,结肠直肠ERAS®实施后恢复良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of a clinical activity index in comparison to frequently measured laboratory values in inflammatory bowel disease. Efficacy and safety of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Global burden of colorectal cancer attributable to metabolic risks from 1990 to 2021, with projections of mortality to 2035. Dissecting the rising tide of inflammatory bowel disease among youth in a changing world: insights from GBD 2021. Timing and morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after rectal cancer resection: a prospective observational multicentre snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1