Return of individual research results to participants with and at risk for Parkinson's disease.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.616
Samantha E Lettenberger, Emily A Hartman, Kali Tam, Peggy Auinger, Meghan E Pawlik, Renee Wilson, Elizabeth T Banda, Blanca Valdovinos, Daniel Kinel, Roy N Alcalay, E Ray Dorsey, Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann, Saloni Sharma, Robert G Holloway, Ruth B Schneider
{"title":"Return of individual research results to participants with and at risk for Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Samantha E Lettenberger, Emily A Hartman, Kali Tam, Peggy Auinger, Meghan E Pawlik, Renee Wilson, Elizabeth T Banda, Blanca Valdovinos, Daniel Kinel, Roy N Alcalay, E Ray Dorsey, Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann, Saloni Sharma, Robert G Holloway, Ruth B Schneider","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a prospective, remote natural history study of 277 individuals with (60) and genetically at risk for (217) Parkinson's disease (PD), we examined interest in the return of individual research results (IRRs) and compared characteristics of those who opted for versus against the return of IRRs. Most (<i>n</i> = 180, 65%) requested sharing of IRRs with either a primary care provider, neurologist, or themselves. Among individuals without PD, those who requested sharing of IRRs with a clinician reported more motor symptoms than those who did not request any sharing (mean (SD) 2.2 (4.0) versus 0.7 (1.5)). Participant interest in the return of IRRs is strong.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a prospective, remote natural history study of 277 individuals with (60) and genetically at risk for (217) Parkinson's disease (PD), we examined interest in the return of individual research results (IRRs) and compared characteristics of those who opted for versus against the return of IRRs. Most (n = 180, 65%) requested sharing of IRRs with either a primary care provider, neurologist, or themselves. Among individuals without PD, those who requested sharing of IRRs with a clinician reported more motor symptoms than those who did not request any sharing (mean (SD) 2.2 (4.0) versus 0.7 (1.5)). Participant interest in the return of IRRs is strong.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将个人研究结果反馈给患有或有患帕金森病风险的参与者。
在一项前瞻性、远程自然历史研究中,我们对277例(60例)和(217例)帕金森病(PD)遗传风险个体进行了研究,考察了对个人研究结果(IRRs)回报的兴趣,并比较了那些选择和不选择IRRs回报的个体的特征。大多数(n = 180,65%)要求与初级保健提供者、神经科医生或他们自己分享IRRs。在没有PD的个体中,那些要求与临床医生分享IRRs的人比那些没有要求分享IRRs的人报告了更多的运动症状(平均(SD) 2.2(4.0)对0.7(1.5))。参与者对内部回报率的兴趣很强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using technology to increase reach and optimize consent experience for a large-scale research program. Evaluating translational science knowledge gains following an online short course for a general scientific audience. Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. The changing demographics and severity in hospitalized patients across COVID-19 variants: A national cohort study. A pilot randomized controlled trial of the iPeer2Peer program in adolescents with sickle cell disease: A mixed method study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1