The Spanish translation, adaptation, and validation of a Community-Engaged Research survey and a pragmatic short version: Encuesta Comunitaria and FUERTES.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.613
Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa, Juan M Peña, Carlos Devia, Blake Boursaw, Magdalena Avila, Diana Rudametkin, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Margarita Alegria, Lourdes E Soto de Laurido, Edna Acosta Pérez, Nina Wallerstein
{"title":"The Spanish translation, adaptation, and validation of a Community-Engaged Research survey and a pragmatic short version: Encuesta Comunitaria and FUERTES.","authors":"Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa, Juan M Peña, Carlos Devia, Blake Boursaw, Magdalena Avila, Diana Rudametkin, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Margarita Alegria, Lourdes E Soto de Laurido, Edna Acosta Pérez, Nina Wallerstein","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) and Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) require validated measures and metrics for evaluating research partnerships and outcomes. There is a need to adapt and translate existing measures for practical use with diverse and non-English-speaking communities. This paper describes the Spanish translation and adaptation of Engage for Equity's Community Engagement Survey (E<sup>2</sup> CES), a nationally validated and empirically-supported CEnR evaluation tool, into the full-length \"<i>Encuesta Comunitaria</i>,\" and a pragmatic shorter version \"<i>Fortaleciendo y Uniendo EsfueRzos Transdisciplinarios para Equidad de Salud</i>\" (FUERTES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community and academic partners from the mainland US, Puerto Rico, and Nicaragua participated in translating and adapting E<sup>2</sup> CES, preserving content validity, psychometric properties, and importance to stakeholders of items, scales, and CBPR constructs (contexts, partnership processes, intervention and research actions, and outcomes). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and convergent validity was assessed via a correlation matrix among scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Encuesta Comunitaria</i> respondents (<i>N</i> = 57) self-identified as primarily Latinos/as/x (97%), female (74%), and academics (61%). Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.72 to 0.88 for items in the context domain to 0.90-0.92 for items in the intervention/research domain. Correlations were found as expected among subscales, with the strongest relationships found for subscales within the same CBPR domain. Results informed the creation of FUERTES.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Encuenta Comunitaria</i> and FUERTES offer CEnR/CBPR practitioners two validated instruments for assessing their research partnering practices, and outcomes. Moreover, FUERTES meets the need for shorter pragmatic tools. These measures can further strengthen CEnR/CBPR involving Latino/a/x communities within the US, Latin America, and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) and Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) require validated measures and metrics for evaluating research partnerships and outcomes. There is a need to adapt and translate existing measures for practical use with diverse and non-English-speaking communities. This paper describes the Spanish translation and adaptation of Engage for Equity's Community Engagement Survey (E2 CES), a nationally validated and empirically-supported CEnR evaluation tool, into the full-length "Encuesta Comunitaria," and a pragmatic shorter version "Fortaleciendo y Uniendo EsfueRzos Transdisciplinarios para Equidad de Salud" (FUERTES).

Methods: Community and academic partners from the mainland US, Puerto Rico, and Nicaragua participated in translating and adapting E2 CES, preserving content validity, psychometric properties, and importance to stakeholders of items, scales, and CBPR constructs (contexts, partnership processes, intervention and research actions, and outcomes). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and convergent validity was assessed via a correlation matrix among scales.

Results: Encuesta Comunitaria respondents (N = 57) self-identified as primarily Latinos/as/x (97%), female (74%), and academics (61%). Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.72 to 0.88 for items in the context domain to 0.90-0.92 for items in the intervention/research domain. Correlations were found as expected among subscales, with the strongest relationships found for subscales within the same CBPR domain. Results informed the creation of FUERTES.

Conclusions: Encuenta Comunitaria and FUERTES offer CEnR/CBPR practitioners two validated instruments for assessing their research partnering practices, and outcomes. Moreover, FUERTES meets the need for shorter pragmatic tools. These measures can further strengthen CEnR/CBPR involving Latino/a/x communities within the US, Latin America, and globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙语翻译、改编和验证社区参与研究调查和实用简短版本:Encuesta社区和FUERTES。
社区参与研究(CEnR)和社区参与研究(CBPR)需要有效的措施和指标来评估研究伙伴关系和成果。有必要调整和翻译现有的措施,以便在不同的非英语社区中实际使用。本文介绍了西班牙语翻译和改编的参与公平的社区参与调查(E2 CES),一个国家验证和经验支持的CEnR评估工具,到完整的“Encuesta社区”和一个实用的简短版本“Fortaleciendo y Uniendo EsfueRzos跨学科的para Equidad de Salud”(FUERTES)。方法:来自美国大陆、波多黎各和尼加拉瓜的社区和学术合作伙伴参与了E2 CES的翻译和改编,保留了项目、量表和CBPR结构(语境、伙伴关系过程、干预和研究行动和结果)的内容效度、心理测量特性和对利益相关者的重要性。内部一致性采用Cronbach's alpha评估,收敛效度通过量表间的相关矩阵评估。结果:Encuesta communitaria受访者(N = 57)自我认同主要为拉丁裔/as/x(97%),女性(74%)和学者(61%)。情境领域的项目Cronbach’s alpha值为0.72 - 0.88,干预/研究领域的项目Cronbach’s alpha值为0.90-0.92。在子量表之间发现了预期的相关性,在同一CBPR域内的子量表中发现了最强的关系。结果为FUERTES的创建提供了信息。结论:Encuenta communitaria和FUERTES为CEnR/CBPR从业者提供了两种经过验证的工具,用于评估他们的研究合作实践和结果。此外,FUERTES满足了对更短的实用工具的需求。这些措施可以进一步加强涉及美国、拉丁美洲和全球拉丁裔/a/x社区的CEnR/CBPR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. Erratum: 489 Nasal-derived Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) carry a cargo of antiviral and immunomodulatory molecules - CORRIGENDUM. Local context review by single institutional review boards: Results from a modified Delphi process. Considerations and recommendations for collaborative research networks in epidemiology: Lessons learned from the diabetes LEAD Network. Training T-shaped translational scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1