Digit-in-Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1111/jir.13205
Noa Shmerler, Leah Fostick, Ronit Saban-Bezalel
{"title":"Digit-in-Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability.","authors":"Noa Shmerler, Leah Fostick, Ronit Saban-Bezalel","doi":"10.1111/jir.13205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) may overshadow, or co-occur with, hearing impairment, but screening is frequently inaccessible due to various factors that prevent successful test execution. There is a pressing need for easily, locally administered hearing tests. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the digit-in-noise (DIN) test, as well as three variations of it, as a hearing screening for individuals with mild to moderate ID. Additionally, we explored correlations between participant characteristics and cognitive-linguistic abilities, with DIN test performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty participants with ID aged 21-40 were recruited from two supported employment centres, 31 of whom met full inclusion criteria. Controls were 20 typically developed (TD) participants, aged 21-40. The original DIN test (DIN(3)) was administered, and those unable to recall the three digits were administered a version with two digits (DIN(2)). Participants unable to successfully complete DIN(3) or DIN(2) were administered versions with added visual and verbal performance feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference in speech receptive threshold in noise (SRTn) between DIN(2) and DIN(3) was only present for the ID group. A moderate negative relationship between DIN(2) SRTn and vocabulary and a positive relationship with age was found for the ID group; no correlation was found with digit span or matrices. The DIN(2) SRTn was correlated with the average hearing level of pure tones measured by audiometry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the DIN(2) as the most effective version, as its signal-to-noise ratio (SRTn) threshold was closest to the typically developed (TD) control group. This study is the first step towards developing a hearing screening test for individuals with ID who are at elevated risk of impairment and who have insufficient evaluation access. Our findings suggest that adults with mild to moderate ID can sufficiently perform the adapted DIN(2) as a hearing screening test.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) may overshadow, or co-occur with, hearing impairment, but screening is frequently inaccessible due to various factors that prevent successful test execution. There is a pressing need for easily, locally administered hearing tests. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the digit-in-noise (DIN) test, as well as three variations of it, as a hearing screening for individuals with mild to moderate ID. Additionally, we explored correlations between participant characteristics and cognitive-linguistic abilities, with DIN test performance.

Method: Forty participants with ID aged 21-40 were recruited from two supported employment centres, 31 of whom met full inclusion criteria. Controls were 20 typically developed (TD) participants, aged 21-40. The original DIN test (DIN(3)) was administered, and those unable to recall the three digits were administered a version with two digits (DIN(2)). Participants unable to successfully complete DIN(3) or DIN(2) were administered versions with added visual and verbal performance feedback.

Results: A significant difference in speech receptive threshold in noise (SRTn) between DIN(2) and DIN(3) was only present for the ID group. A moderate negative relationship between DIN(2) SRTn and vocabulary and a positive relationship with age was found for the ID group; no correlation was found with digit span or matrices. The DIN(2) SRTn was correlated with the average hearing level of pure tones measured by audiometry.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the DIN(2) as the most effective version, as its signal-to-noise ratio (SRTn) threshold was closest to the typically developed (TD) control group. This study is the first step towards developing a hearing screening test for individuals with ID who are at elevated risk of impairment and who have insufficient evaluation access. Our findings suggest that adults with mild to moderate ID can sufficiently perform the adapted DIN(2) as a hearing screening test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噪音数字测试作为智力残疾人士的听力筛选测试。
背景:智力障碍(ID)的诊断可能会掩盖听力障碍,或与听力障碍同时发生,但由于各种因素阻碍了测试的成功执行,筛查通常无法进行。迫切需要方便、在当地进行的听力测试。本研究旨在评估噪声中位数(DIN)测试的有效性,以及它的三种变体,作为轻度至中度ID患者的听力筛查。此外,我们探讨了参与者特征与认知语言能力之间的相关性,以及DIN测试的表现。方法:从两间支援就业中心招募40名年龄介于21至40岁的参加者,其中31名符合完全纳入标准。对照组为20名典型发育(TD)参与者,年龄21-40岁。进行原始DIN测试(DIN(3)),无法回忆起三位数字的人进行两位数版本(DIN(2))。无法成功完成DIN(3)或DIN(2)的参与者被给予添加视觉和口头表现反馈的版本。结果:DIN(2)和DIN(3)之间的语音接受噪声阈值(SRTn)仅在ID组中存在显著差异。ID组DIN(2) SRTn与词汇量呈中等负相关,与年龄呈正相关;与数字跨度或矩阵没有相关性。DIN(2) SRTn与听力学测得的纯音平均听力水平相关。结论:我们的研究结果突出了DIN(2)是最有效的版本,因为它的信噪比(SRTn)阈值最接近典型发展(TD)对照组。这项研究是开发听力筛查测试的第一步,该测试适用于听力受损风险较高且评估途径不足的ID患者。我们的研究结果表明,轻度至中度ID的成年人可以充分地进行适应DIN(2)作为听力筛查测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive overview of neuropsychiatric symptoms in adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Development and evaluation of the Trauma Screener-Intellectual Disability: a post-traumatic stress disorder screening tool for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning. Eating and feeding disorders in adults with intellectual developmental disorder with and without autism spectrum disorder. High frequency of mitochondrial DNA rearrangements in the peripheral blood of adults with intellectual disability. Adults With Intellectual Disabilities and Incontinence: Assessment and Toileting Issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1