Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102885
Anne Pinton, Sonia Doucet, Alice Hoquette, Pierre Delorme
{"title":"Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room.","authors":"Anne Pinton, Sonia Doucet, Alice Hoquette, Pierre Delorme","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the experiences of partners accompanying pregnant women during a caesarean section and to identify factors which influence the experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a prospective, single-center, observational study which included all partners of women who underwent a planned or an unplanned caesarean section in a maternity hospital during a two months period (1st November 2020 - 1st January 2021). The outcome was evaluated by a standardized questionnaire: the first-time father questionnaire (FTFQ) (1). Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the factors associated with the results of the FTFQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 partners were included in the study. Partners were generally satisfied with their attendance at the caesarean section, with 91 % claiming a good experience of it and expressed a willingness to repeat the experience. The partners were satisfied with the support provided by the medical team and with their accompaniment (79 %). Most partners were reassured and guided by health professionals when necessary (61 %). Nevertheless, partner anxiety was common (50 %) throughout the procedure. Only one factor was significantly associated with a decreased partner satisfaction: transfer of the newborn to the intensive care or neonatology unit (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost all partners were satisfied to be in the operating room for a cesarean section regardless of the type of caesarean (planned and unplanned). Partner satisfaction should be considered by maternity staff as a relevant factor in their decision to accept or refuse the partner's presence in the operating room during the cesarean section.</p>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"102885"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the experiences of partners accompanying pregnant women during a caesarean section and to identify factors which influence the experiences.

Methods: It is a prospective, single-center, observational study which included all partners of women who underwent a planned or an unplanned caesarean section in a maternity hospital during a two months period (1st November 2020 - 1st January 2021). The outcome was evaluated by a standardized questionnaire: the first-time father questionnaire (FTFQ) (1). Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the factors associated with the results of the FTFQ.

Results: A total of 100 partners were included in the study. Partners were generally satisfied with their attendance at the caesarean section, with 91 % claiming a good experience of it and expressed a willingness to repeat the experience. The partners were satisfied with the support provided by the medical team and with their accompaniment (79 %). Most partners were reassured and guided by health professionals when necessary (61 %). Nevertheless, partner anxiety was common (50 %) throughout the procedure. Only one factor was significantly associated with a decreased partner satisfaction: transfer of the newborn to the intensive care or neonatology unit (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Almost all partners were satisfied to be in the operating room for a cesarean section regardless of the type of caesarean (planned and unplanned). Partner satisfaction should be considered by maternity staff as a relevant factor in their decision to accept or refuse the partner's presence in the operating room during the cesarean section.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作伙伴在手术室剖腹产的经验。
目的:描述伴产孕妇剖宫产术的经历,并探讨影响其经历的因素。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究,纳入了两个月期间(2020年11月1日至2021年1月1日)在妇产医院接受计划或非计划剖腹产的妇女的所有伴侣。结果通过标准化问卷进行评估:首次父亲问卷(FTFQ)(1)。进行单因素和多因素分析来评估与FTFQ结果相关的因素。结果:共纳入100名伴侣。伴侣们普遍对他们参加剖腹产手术感到满意,91%的人声称这是一次很好的经历,并表示愿意再次经历。伴侣对医疗团队提供的支持及其陪伴感到满意(79%)。大多数伴侣在必要时得到卫生专业人员的保证和指导(61%)。然而,在整个手术过程中,伴侣焦虑很常见(50%)。只有一个因素与伴侣满意度降低显著相关:新生儿转到重症监护室或新生儿病房(p=0.04)。结论:无论何种剖宫产方式(计划剖宫产和非计划剖宫产),几乎所有的手术伴都对剖宫产手术满意。在决定接受或拒绝伴侣在剖宫产手术期间出现时,产科工作人员应将伴侣满意度作为一个相关因素加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester. High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers. Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room. The characteristics and parenthood aspirations of single women and lesbian couples seeking motherhood through sperm donation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel in pregnant women with advanced stage cervical cancer: Maternal and perinatal outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1