The role of cognitive load on interlimb differences in motor coordination in older adults.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1152/jn.00167.2024
S A L Jayasinghe
{"title":"The role of cognitive load on interlimb differences in motor coordination in older adults.","authors":"S A L Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1152/jn.00167.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the dominant hand has been shown to have performance advantages over the nondominant hand, these interlimb differences have found to be dependent on task and biomechanical demands. The dynamic dominance hypothesis suggests that the left hemisphere is specialized for the control of intersegmental dynamics while the nondominant right hemisphere is specialized for postural control, in right-handers. In a real-world scenario, however, cognitive challenges might be expected to modulate these specialized behaviors. Therefore, we hypothesized that with increased cognitive load, lateralized motor control processes would become even more asymmetrical. We recruited 16 right-handed older adults (11 females, 5 males; 65.88 yr ± 1.99 SE) to perform 170 trials of a unilateral reaching task with each of their hands on the Kinereach system. In each trial, participants rapidly memorized pictorial instructions before identifying and reaching for the correct object on a screen. The complexity of the task increased over the course of the experiment. Our results demonstrated higher reaction times in the right than in the left hand (<i>P</i> = 0.0004). Movements became increasingly curved and erroneous with cognitive load, but interlimb differences in movement quality were absent. We found higher joint cocontraction in the right than in the left arm (<i>P</i> < 0.05), but these differences were unaffected by cognitive load. Hence, with the addition of a cognitive load, we observed asymmetries in reaction time but not in joint coordination or movement quality. This highlights the role of cognitive load in modulating limb/hemisphere specializations for control processes.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although we know that motor control processes are lateralized to each hemisphere, the role of cognitive load on these specialized processes is undefined. We designed a unique task that incorporates a cognitive challenge to a typical reaching movement to examine how cognitive load affects limb asymmetries in motor control. In a group of typical older adults, we demonstrated interlimb asymmetries in reaction time but not in joint coordination or movement quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00167.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the dominant hand has been shown to have performance advantages over the nondominant hand, these interlimb differences have found to be dependent on task and biomechanical demands. The dynamic dominance hypothesis suggests that the left hemisphere is specialized for the control of intersegmental dynamics while the nondominant right hemisphere is specialized for postural control, in right-handers. In a real-world scenario, however, cognitive challenges might be expected to modulate these specialized behaviors. Therefore, we hypothesized that with increased cognitive load, lateralized motor control processes would become even more asymmetrical. We recruited 16 right-handed older adults (11 females, 5 males; 65.88 yr ± 1.99 SE) to perform 170 trials of a unilateral reaching task with each of their hands on the Kinereach system. In each trial, participants rapidly memorized pictorial instructions before identifying and reaching for the correct object on a screen. The complexity of the task increased over the course of the experiment. Our results demonstrated higher reaction times in the right than in the left hand (P = 0.0004). Movements became increasingly curved and erroneous with cognitive load, but interlimb differences in movement quality were absent. We found higher joint cocontraction in the right than in the left arm (P < 0.05), but these differences were unaffected by cognitive load. Hence, with the addition of a cognitive load, we observed asymmetries in reaction time but not in joint coordination or movement quality. This highlights the role of cognitive load in modulating limb/hemisphere specializations for control processes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although we know that motor control processes are lateralized to each hemisphere, the role of cognitive load on these specialized processes is undefined. We designed a unique task that incorporates a cognitive challenge to a typical reaching movement to examine how cognitive load affects limb asymmetries in motor control. In a group of typical older adults, we demonstrated interlimb asymmetries in reaction time but not in joint coordination or movement quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知负荷对老年人肢体间运动协调差异的影响。
虽然优势手已被证明比非优势手具有性能优势,但这些肢间差异已被发现依赖于任务和生物力学需求。动态优势假说认为,在右撇子中,左脑半球专门控制节段间动力学,而非优势的右脑半球专门控制姿势。然而,在现实世界中,认知挑战可能会调节这些专门的行为。因此,我们假设随着认知负荷的增加,侧化运动控制过程会变得更加不对称。我们招募了16名右撇子老年人(11名女性,5名男性;(65.88±1.99 SEM)进行170次单侧伸手任务试验,每只手都在Kinereach系统上。在每次试验中,参与者在识别和触摸屏幕上的正确物体之前,都要迅速记住一组图片说明。随着实验的进行,任务的复杂程度越来越高。我们的结果表明,与左手相比,右手的反应时间更长(p = 0.0004)。随着认知负荷的增加,运动变得越来越弯曲和错误,但肢体间运动质量的差异不存在。我们发现右臂的关节收缩比左臂高(p < 0.05),但这些差异不受认知负荷的影响。因此,随着认知负荷的增加,我们观察到反应时间的不对称,而不是关节协调或运动质量的不对称。这突出了认知负荷在调节肢体/半球控制过程特殊化中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
Changes in thoracic erector spinae regional activation during postural adjustments and functional reaching tasks after spinal cord injury. Cortical acetylcholine response to deep brain stimulation of the basal forebrain in mice. Differentiating the contributions of Na+/K+ pump current and persistent Na+ current in simulated voltage-clamp experiments. Feature selectivity of corticocortical feedback along the primate dorsal visual pathway. Without visual feedback voluntary torque is overestimated during muscle potentiation despite similar motor unit firing rate and perception of exertion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1