Intrinsic capacity and ageing well for Aboriginal people in remote Western Australia: a longitudinal cohort study

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52544
Zoë Hyde, Kate Smith, Roslyn Malay, Dina C LoGiudice, Dawn C Bessarab, David N Atkinson, Edward Strivens, Leon Flicker
{"title":"Intrinsic capacity and ageing well for Aboriginal people in remote Western Australia: a longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Zoë Hyde,&nbsp;Kate Smith,&nbsp;Roslyn Malay,&nbsp;Dina C LoGiudice,&nbsp;Dawn C Bessarab,&nbsp;David N Atkinson,&nbsp;Edward Strivens,&nbsp;Leon Flicker","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess intrinsic capacity, an important component of ageing well, in older Aboriginal people living in remote Western Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Longitudinal cohort study; secondary analysis of survey and clinical assessment data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Kimberley region of Western Australia (six remote communities, and the town of Derby).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal people aged 45 years or older, initially recruited 15 July 2004 – 17 November 2006.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Intrinsic capacity (assessed in each participant by questionnaire and review by a consultant specialist), overall and by domain, and presence of core activity limitations, at baseline and follow-up (8 February 2011 – 6 June 2013); risk of death by follow-up; preservation of intrinsic capacity at follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean age of the 345 participants at baseline was 60.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 11.6 years; range, 45–96 years); 152 were men (44.1%) and 193 were women (55.9%). Intrinsic capacity was unimpaired in all five domains for 55 participants (15.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4–20.2%). Capacity in the vitality domain was unimpaired in 325 respondents (94.2%), in the psychological/mood domain in 318 (92.2%), and in the cognition domain in 289 people (83.8%); the locomotion domain was unimpaired in 174 people (50.4%), and the sensory domain in 117 people (33.9%). The proportion of men with full capacity in all five domains (32 of 152, 21.1%) was larger than for women (23 of 193, 11.9%). Of the 274 people included in follow-up analyses, intrinsic capacity was lower than at baseline for 66 people (24.1%), it was unchanged or improved in 111 participants (40.5%; 95% CI, 34.8–46.5%), and 97 people had died (35.4%). Thirty-seven of the 177 surviving participants for whom complete data were available had full capacity in all domains (20.9%; 95% CI, 15.5–27.6%). After adjustment for age, the number of unimpaired intrinsic capacity domains at baseline was inversely associated with having a core activity limitation at baseline (per domain: adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34–0.55) and follow-up (adjusted risk ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44–0.88), and with risk of death by follow-up (adjusted risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.96).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Impaired intrinsic capacity in older Aboriginal people living in the Kimberley was most frequent in the sensory and locomotion domains. Reduced capacity in these domains could be highly amenable to treatment that would ensure that Elders can continue to take part in activities important for quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 1","pages":"38-46"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52544","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess intrinsic capacity, an important component of ageing well, in older Aboriginal people living in remote Western Australia.

Study design

Longitudinal cohort study; secondary analysis of survey and clinical assessment data.

Setting

Kimberley region of Western Australia (six remote communities, and the town of Derby).

Participants

Aboriginal people aged 45 years or older, initially recruited 15 July 2004 – 17 November 2006.

Main outcome measures

Intrinsic capacity (assessed in each participant by questionnaire and review by a consultant specialist), overall and by domain, and presence of core activity limitations, at baseline and follow-up (8 February 2011 – 6 June 2013); risk of death by follow-up; preservation of intrinsic capacity at follow-up.

Results

The mean age of the 345 participants at baseline was 60.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 11.6 years; range, 45–96 years); 152 were men (44.1%) and 193 were women (55.9%). Intrinsic capacity was unimpaired in all five domains for 55 participants (15.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4–20.2%). Capacity in the vitality domain was unimpaired in 325 respondents (94.2%), in the psychological/mood domain in 318 (92.2%), and in the cognition domain in 289 people (83.8%); the locomotion domain was unimpaired in 174 people (50.4%), and the sensory domain in 117 people (33.9%). The proportion of men with full capacity in all five domains (32 of 152, 21.1%) was larger than for women (23 of 193, 11.9%). Of the 274 people included in follow-up analyses, intrinsic capacity was lower than at baseline for 66 people (24.1%), it was unchanged or improved in 111 participants (40.5%; 95% CI, 34.8–46.5%), and 97 people had died (35.4%). Thirty-seven of the 177 surviving participants for whom complete data were available had full capacity in all domains (20.9%; 95% CI, 15.5–27.6%). After adjustment for age, the number of unimpaired intrinsic capacity domains at baseline was inversely associated with having a core activity limitation at baseline (per domain: adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34–0.55) and follow-up (adjusted risk ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44–0.88), and with risk of death by follow-up (adjusted risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.96).

Conclusions

Impaired intrinsic capacity in older Aboriginal people living in the Kimberley was most frequent in the sensory and locomotion domains. Reduced capacity in these domains could be highly amenable to treatment that would ensure that Elders can continue to take part in activities important for quality of life.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西澳大利亚偏远地区土著人的内在能力和老龄化:一项纵向队列研究。
目的:评估内在能力,老龄化的一个重要组成部分,在老年土著居民生活在偏远的西澳大利亚州。研究设计:纵向队列研究;对调查和临床评价资料进行二次分析。环境:西澳大利亚的金伯利地区(六个偏远社区和德比镇)。参与者:45岁以上的原住民,2004年7月15日至2006年11月17日首次招募。主要结果测量指标:基线和随访(2011年2月8日至2013年6月6日)时,总体和按领域划分的内在能力(每位参与者通过问卷调查和顾问专家的审查进行评估);随访造成的死亡风险;保留后续行动的内在能力。结果:345名参与者基线时的平均年龄为60.2岁(标准差[SD], 11.6岁;范围:45-96岁);男性152例(44.1%),女性193例(55.9%)。55名参与者的内在能力在所有五个领域均未受损(15.9%;95%可信区间[CI], 12.4-20.2%)。325人(94.2%)在活力领域的能力未受损,318人(92.2%)在心理/情绪领域,289人(83.8%)在认知领域;174人(50.4%)运动区未受损,117人(33.9%)感觉区未受损。在所有五个领域都具备全部能力的男性比例(152人中32人,21.1%)大于女性(193人中23人,11.9%)。在随访分析的274人中,有66人(24.1%)的内在能力低于基线,111人(40.5%)的内在能力保持不变或有所改善;95% CI, 34.8-46.5%),死亡97人(35.4%)。177名幸存的参与者中,有37人在所有领域都有完全的能力(20.9%;95% ci, 15.5-27.6%)。在年龄调整后,基线时未受损的内在能力域的数量与基线时核心活动受限呈负相关(每个域:调整患病率比,0.43;95% CI, 0.34-0.55)和随访(调整风险比,0.62;95% CI, 0.44-0.88),随访死亡风险(校正风险比,0.83;95% ci, 0.71-0.96)。结论:居住在金伯利的老年土著居民的内在能力受损在感觉和运动领域最为常见。在这些方面能力下降的人可以通过治疗来确保老年人能够继续参加对生活质量很重要的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Consensus recommendations on multiple sclerosis management in Australia and New Zealand: part 1. Consensus recommendations on multiple sclerosis management in Australia and New Zealand: part 2. Consideration of sex and gender: an analysis of Australian clinical guidelines. Potentially preventable medication-related hospitalisations with cardiovascular disease of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Queensland, 2013-2017: a retrospective cohort study. Use of ChatGPT to obtain health information in Australia, 2024: insights from a nationally representative survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1