Cicero's universal law: a timeless guide to reproductive justice.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0403
Frank A Chervenak, Susan L Pollet, Renee McLeod-Sordjan, Amos Grünebaum
{"title":"Cicero's universal law: a timeless guide to reproductive justice.","authors":"Frank A Chervenak, Susan L Pollet, Renee McLeod-Sordjan, Amos Grünebaum","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Marcus Tullius Cicero's concept of \"ius gentium,\" or universal law, provides a timeless framework for understanding and defending fundamental human rights, particularly in the context of reproductive freedom. Cicero distinguished between \"ius gentium\" and \"ius civile,\" emphasizing that while civil law governs specific communities, universal law, rooted in natural reason, applies to all humanity. This philosophical foundation resonates with modern discussions on reproductive rights, where universal principles of justice and bodily autonomy are at stake. Enlightened by Immanuel Kant's notion of innate freedom, Cicero's philosophy challenges present day's US states' restrictive reproductive laws, which often contradict the universal principles of justice. Applying these concepts to contemporary issues, such as abortion rights, underscores the need to align civil laws with universal ethics, ensuring that individual freedoms are upheld against arbitrary state interventions. By advocating for policies that promote equitable access to reproductive healthcare, Cicero's vision of universal law remains a powerful tool for advancing human dignity and autonomy in modern society.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marcus Tullius Cicero's concept of "ius gentium," or universal law, provides a timeless framework for understanding and defending fundamental human rights, particularly in the context of reproductive freedom. Cicero distinguished between "ius gentium" and "ius civile," emphasizing that while civil law governs specific communities, universal law, rooted in natural reason, applies to all humanity. This philosophical foundation resonates with modern discussions on reproductive rights, where universal principles of justice and bodily autonomy are at stake. Enlightened by Immanuel Kant's notion of innate freedom, Cicero's philosophy challenges present day's US states' restrictive reproductive laws, which often contradict the universal principles of justice. Applying these concepts to contemporary issues, such as abortion rights, underscores the need to align civil laws with universal ethics, ensuring that individual freedoms are upheld against arbitrary state interventions. By advocating for policies that promote equitable access to reproductive healthcare, Cicero's vision of universal law remains a powerful tool for advancing human dignity and autonomy in modern society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西塞罗的普遍法则:生殖正义的永恒指南。
马库斯·图利乌斯·西塞罗(Marcus Tullius Cicero)的“ius gentium”(普遍法则)概念,为理解和捍卫基本人权,尤其是生殖自由提供了一个永恒的框架。西塞罗区分了“ius gentium”和“ius civilile”,强调民法管辖特定社区,而植根于自然理性的普遍法适用于全人类。这一哲学基础与现代关于生殖权利的讨论产生了共鸣,在生殖权利中,正义和身体自主的普遍原则受到威胁。受伊曼努尔•康德(Immanuel Kant)先天自由概念的启发,西塞罗的哲学挑战了当今美国各州限制性的生殖法律,这些法律往往与普遍的正义原则相矛盾。将这些概念应用于当代问题,如堕胎权,强调有必要使民法与普遍伦理保持一致,确保维护个人自由,反对武断的国家干预。通过倡导促进公平获得生殖保健的政策,西塞罗的普遍法愿景仍然是在现代社会中促进人类尊严和自主的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators. Trends in gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes in the United States. Prenatal care for twin pregnancies: analysis of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Severe maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies: the impact of body mass index and gestational weight gain. Hematological indicators and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with thalassemia traits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1