Examination of evaluation indicators for spasticity in stroke patients using ultrasound imaging equipment.

Takahiro Okazaki, Shota Nagai
{"title":"Examination of evaluation indicators for spasticity in stroke patients using ultrasound imaging equipment.","authors":"Takahiro Okazaki, Shota Nagai","doi":"10.1589/jpts.36.776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] To compare the muscle evaluation indices obtained by scanning the spastic muscles of stroke patients between the paretic and non-paretic sides using ultrasound imaging equipment, determine whether any features can be detected, and verify whether the evaluation indices that detect differences are valid for measuring the degree of spasticity. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 23 first-ever stroke patients with motor paralysis in one upper or lower limb, admitted to our hospital between 1 and 6 months after onset. The biceps brachii muscle and medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle were evaluated on both sides using ultrasound imaging equipment. The muscle evaluation indices were muscle thickness, muscle echo intensity, muscle stiffness, and muscle-tendon junction displacement. Pennation angles were also measured at the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. [Results] Significant differences were found between the paretic and nonparetic sides in the muscle-tendon junction displacement of the biceps brachii muscle and edial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. No significant differences were found in the other muscle evaluation indices. [Conclusion] Muscle-tendon junction displacement was the only index that showed significant differences between the non-paretic and paretic sides. It showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with the Modified Ashworth Scale, suggesting its potential as an alternative evaluation index for muscle strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"36 12","pages":"776-781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Purpose] To compare the muscle evaluation indices obtained by scanning the spastic muscles of stroke patients between the paretic and non-paretic sides using ultrasound imaging equipment, determine whether any features can be detected, and verify whether the evaluation indices that detect differences are valid for measuring the degree of spasticity. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 23 first-ever stroke patients with motor paralysis in one upper or lower limb, admitted to our hospital between 1 and 6 months after onset. The biceps brachii muscle and medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle were evaluated on both sides using ultrasound imaging equipment. The muscle evaluation indices were muscle thickness, muscle echo intensity, muscle stiffness, and muscle-tendon junction displacement. Pennation angles were also measured at the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. [Results] Significant differences were found between the paretic and nonparetic sides in the muscle-tendon junction displacement of the biceps brachii muscle and edial head of the gastrocnemius muscle. No significant differences were found in the other muscle evaluation indices. [Conclusion] Muscle-tendon junction displacement was the only index that showed significant differences between the non-paretic and paretic sides. It showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with the Modified Ashworth Scale, suggesting its potential as an alternative evaluation index for muscle strain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声成像设备对脑卒中患者痉挛评价指标的研究。
【目的】比较超声成像设备扫描卒中患者麻痹侧与非麻痹侧痉挛肌所获得的肌肉评价指标,确定是否能检测到任何特征,验证检测差异的评价指标对测量痉挛程度是否有效。【对象与方法】研究对象为23例首发脑卒中患者,均为发病后1 ~ 6个月入院的单侧或下肢运动麻痹患者。采用超声显像仪对两侧肱二头肌和腓肠肌内侧头进行检查。肌肉评价指标为肌肉厚度、肌肉回声强度、肌肉僵硬度、肌肉-肌腱连接处位移。在腓肠肌内侧头处也测量了夹角。[结果]轻瘫侧与非轻瘫侧肱二头肌肌-肌腱连接处位移和腓肠肌内侧头位移有显著性差异。其他肌肉评价指标无显著性差异。[结论]肌腱连接处位移是唯一在非麻痹侧和麻痹侧有显著差异的指标。与修正Ashworth量表有中强相关性,提示其有潜力作为肌肉劳损的替代评价指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between performance of basic movements at admission and socioenvironmental factors and returning home following inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Comparison of changes in skeletal muscle mass after stroke categorized by the severity of motor dysfunction: a retrospective study. Comparison of skin-to-bone distance in the interscapular region when measured in the prone position and in the seated position in a therapy massage chair. Impact of wheelchair reclining and leg rest angles on pressure distribution in back, buttocks, and feet: an experimental study in healthy adults. Influence of treadmill speed selection on gait parameters compared to overground walking in subacute rehabilitation patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1