The Influence of Area Deprivation Index on Surgical Outcomes in Pancreas Cancer.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/jso.28002
Hala Muaddi, Amy Glasgow, Mohamad K Abou Chaar, Elizabeth Habermann, Patrick Starlinger, Susanne Warner, Rory Smoot, Michael Kendrick, Mark Truty, Cornelius A Thiels
{"title":"The Influence of Area Deprivation Index on Surgical Outcomes in Pancreas Cancer.","authors":"Hala Muaddi, Amy Glasgow, Mohamad K Abou Chaar, Elizabeth Habermann, Patrick Starlinger, Susanne Warner, Rory Smoot, Michael Kendrick, Mark Truty, Cornelius A Thiels","doi":"10.1002/jso.28002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection for pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the mainstay of treatment. Regardless of enhanced survival rates, disparities in patient outcomes and experiences driven by the social determinants of health (SDH) persist. The area deprivation index (ADI) comprises 17 indicators related to education, employment, housing-quality, and poverty. We sought to examine the impact of ADI on surgical outcomes of PDAC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy for PDAC between January 2011 and December 2022 were identified. ADI was calculated using patient zip codes and categorized into quartiles, with the highest indicating the most marginalized. The primary outcome was loss to follow-up after surgical resection. To account for confounders, a competing risk multivariable regression analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1001 patients had a mean age of 66.6 (±9.64), with 46.3% (n = 463) of patients being female. A majority, 94.6% (n = 947), identified as white, and 64.1% (n = 641) had at least a college degree. The median length of follow-up after surgery was 1.8 years (interquartile range: 0.9-3.5). Multivariable analysis adjusting for competing risk of death, showed that patients who are least marginalized are 1.57 times more likely to have their follow-up than those most marginalized (hazard ratio: 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.29, p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDH impact many aspects of patient's care including a higher risk of loss to follow-up for marginalized patients after surgery for PDAC. Future efforts should seek to identify and lower barriers faced by marginalized patients with system-level changes to ensure equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection for pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the mainstay of treatment. Regardless of enhanced survival rates, disparities in patient outcomes and experiences driven by the social determinants of health (SDH) persist. The area deprivation index (ADI) comprises 17 indicators related to education, employment, housing-quality, and poverty. We sought to examine the impact of ADI on surgical outcomes of PDAC patients.

Methods: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy for PDAC between January 2011 and December 2022 were identified. ADI was calculated using patient zip codes and categorized into quartiles, with the highest indicating the most marginalized. The primary outcome was loss to follow-up after surgical resection. To account for confounders, a competing risk multivariable regression analysis was used.

Results: A total of 1001 patients had a mean age of 66.6 (±9.64), with 46.3% (n = 463) of patients being female. A majority, 94.6% (n = 947), identified as white, and 64.1% (n = 641) had at least a college degree. The median length of follow-up after surgery was 1.8 years (interquartile range: 0.9-3.5). Multivariable analysis adjusting for competing risk of death, showed that patients who are least marginalized are 1.57 times more likely to have their follow-up than those most marginalized (hazard ratio: 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.29, p = 0.017).

Conclusion: SDH impact many aspects of patient's care including a higher risk of loss to follow-up for marginalized patients after surgery for PDAC. Future efforts should seek to identify and lower barriers faced by marginalized patients with system-level changes to ensure equitable access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面积剥夺指数对胰腺癌手术疗效的影响。
背景:手术切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)仍然是主要的治疗方法。尽管提高了生存率,但由健康的社会决定因素(SDH)驱动的患者结果和经历的差异仍然存在。地区剥夺指数(ADI)包括与教育、就业、住房质量和贫困有关的17个指标。我们试图研究ADI对PDAC患者手术结果的影响。方法:选取2011年1月至2022年12月期间因PDAC行胰十二指肠切除术或远端胰切除术的患者。ADI使用患者的邮政编码进行计算,并按四分位数进行分类,最高的四分位数表示最边缘化。主要结局是手术切除后失去随访。为了考虑混杂因素,使用了竞争风险多变量回归分析。结果:1001例患者平均年龄66.6(±9.64)岁,女性占46.3% (n = 463)。94.6% (n = 947)为白人,64.1% (n = 641)至少拥有大学学位。术后中位随访时间为1.8年(四分位数范围:0.9-3.5)。调整竞争死亡风险的多变量分析显示,最边缘化的患者随访的可能性是最边缘化患者的1.57倍(风险比:1.57,95%可信区间:1.08-2.29,p = 0.017)。结论:SDH影响患者护理的许多方面,包括PDAC术后边缘患者失去随访的风险更高。未来的努力应寻求通过系统层面的改变来确定和降低边缘化患者面临的障碍,以确保公平获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Cancer: Correspondence. ChatGPT 35 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, Than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions. Dedication of Five Pioneers of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial. CTCs Detection Methods In Vivo and In Vitro and Their Application in Tumor Immunotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1