Patient Preferences in Cochlear Implant Manufacturer Selection.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004375
Michael H Freeman, Ankita Patro, Nathan R Lindquist, Katelyn A Berg, Jourdan T Holder, Matthew R O'Malley, Kareem O Tawfik, Taha A Jan, Elizabeth L Perkins, Aaron C Moberly, David S Haynes, Marc L Bennett
{"title":"Patient Preferences in Cochlear Implant Manufacturer Selection.","authors":"Michael H Freeman, Ankita Patro, Nathan R Lindquist, Katelyn A Berg, Jourdan T Holder, Matthew R O'Malley, Kareem O Tawfik, Taha A Jan, Elizabeth L Perkins, Aaron C Moberly, David S Haynes, Marc L Bennett","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the factors that drive a patient's selection of cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred twenty-eight adult patients undergoing primary CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Survey administered in the preoperative area.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Sources of information regarding CI manufacturer offerings, factors that were most important in deciding on a manufacturer, and manufacturer ultimately selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-eight patients were included (average age, 63.7 years; 97% White). The most cited source of information that patients used to choose a device was his/her audiologist (80.5% of patients). When asked his/her number 1 reason for choosing their CI manufacturer, the most commonly cited reason was technology (e.g., battery life, device pairing), regardless of manufacturer. When asked about specific technology offerings, hearing aid pairing was rated as the most important. The numbers 2 and 3 reasons for choosing a manufacturer were cosmetics/structure of the wearable portion of the device and audiologist recommendation of that manufacturer, respectively. The relative weight given to each of the top 3 reasons differed significantly across the three manufacturers ( p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Audiologists are by far the leading source of information used by patients choosing a CI manufacturer. Patients prioritize technology most when choosing an implant manufacturer, but audiologist recommendation and the cosmetics and structure of the wearable device are also important. CI manufacturers should be mindful of patient priorities when designing and marketing their devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the factors that drive a patient's selection of cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer.

Study design: Prospective survey study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: One hundred twenty-eight adult patients undergoing primary CI.

Interventions: Survey administered in the preoperative area.

Main outcome measures: Sources of information regarding CI manufacturer offerings, factors that were most important in deciding on a manufacturer, and manufacturer ultimately selected.

Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included (average age, 63.7 years; 97% White). The most cited source of information that patients used to choose a device was his/her audiologist (80.5% of patients). When asked his/her number 1 reason for choosing their CI manufacturer, the most commonly cited reason was technology (e.g., battery life, device pairing), regardless of manufacturer. When asked about specific technology offerings, hearing aid pairing was rated as the most important. The numbers 2 and 3 reasons for choosing a manufacturer were cosmetics/structure of the wearable portion of the device and audiologist recommendation of that manufacturer, respectively. The relative weight given to each of the top 3 reasons differed significantly across the three manufacturers ( p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Audiologists are by far the leading source of information used by patients choosing a CI manufacturer. Patients prioritize technology most when choosing an implant manufacturer, but audiologist recommendation and the cosmetics and structure of the wearable device are also important. CI manufacturers should be mindful of patient priorities when designing and marketing their devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对人工耳蜗制造商选择的偏好。
目的:探讨影响患者选择人工耳蜗(CI)生产厂家的因素。研究设计:前瞻性调查研究。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:128例接受原发性CI的成年患者。干预措施:在术前进行调查。主要结果测量:有关CI制造商产品的信息来源,决定制造商的最重要因素,以及最终选择的制造商。结果:纳入128例患者,平均年龄63.7岁;97%的白人)。患者在选择设备时引用最多的信息来源是他/她的听力学家(80.5%的患者)。当被问及他/她选择CI制造商的首要原因时,最常见的原因是技术(例如电池寿命,设备配对),而不是制造商。当被问及具体的技术产品时,助听器配对被评为最重要的。选择制造商的第2和第3个原因分别是设备可穿戴部分的化妆品/结构和该制造商的听力学家推荐。给前3个原因的相对权重在三家制造商之间存在显著差异(p = 0.017)。结论:听力学家是迄今为止患者选择CI制造商所使用的主要信息来源。在选择植入物制造商时,患者最优先考虑的是技术,但听力学家的建议、可穿戴设备的化妆品和结构也很重要。CI制造商在设计和营销其设备时应注意患者的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes. Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Hearing Loss. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes Using Electrical Field Imaging (EFI). Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: 3-Year Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1