A core outcome set for best care for the dying person: Results of an international Delphi study and consensus meeting.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1177/02692163241300867
Sofia C Zambrano, Martina Egloff, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Simon Allan, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, John Ellershaw, Claudia Fischer, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Urška Lunder, Marisa Martin-Rosello, Stephen Mason, Birgit Rasmussen, Valgerdur Sigurðardóttir, Judt Simon, Vilma A Tripodoro, Agnes van der Heide, Lia van Zuylen, Raymond Voltz, Carl Johan Fürst, Paula R Williamson, Steffen Eychmüller
{"title":"A core outcome set for best care for the dying person: Results of an international Delphi study and consensus meeting.","authors":"Sofia C Zambrano, Martina Egloff, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Simon Allan, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, John Ellershaw, Claudia Fischer, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Urška Lunder, Marisa Martin-Rosello, Stephen Mason, Birgit Rasmussen, Valgerdur Sigurðardóttir, Judt Simon, Vilma A Tripodoro, Agnes van der Heide, Lia van Zuylen, Raymond Voltz, Carl Johan Fürst, Paula R Williamson, Steffen Eychmüller","doi":"10.1177/02692163241300867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome measurement is essential to progress clinical practice and improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a Core Outcome Set for best care for the dying person.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We followed the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative guidelines, which involved identifying potential outcomes via a systematic literature review (n = 619 papers) and from participants in the \"iLIVE\" project (10 countries: 101 patients, 37 family members, 63 clinicians), followed by a two-round Delphi study, and a consensus meeting.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Clinicians, researchers, family members, and patient representatives from 20 countries participated in the Delphi Rounds 1 (n = 462) and 2 (n = 355). Thirty-two participants attended the consensus meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the systematic review and the cohort study we identified 256 and 238 outcomes respectively, from which we extracted a 52-outcome list covering areas related to the patients' physical, psychosocial, and spiritual dimensions, family support, place of care and care delivery, relational aspects of care, and general concepts. A preliminary 13-outcome list reached consensus during the Delphi. At the consensus meeting, a 14-item Core Outcome Set was ratified by the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study involved a large and diverse sample of key stakeholders in defining the core outcome set for best care for the dying person, focusing on the last days of life. By actively integrating the perspectives of family carers and patient representatives from various cultural backgrounds this Core Outcome Set enriches our understanding of essential elements of care for the dying and provides a solid foundation for advancing quality of end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"163-175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241300867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outcome measurement is essential to progress clinical practice and improve patient care.

Aim: To develop a Core Outcome Set for best care for the dying person.

Design: We followed the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative guidelines, which involved identifying potential outcomes via a systematic literature review (n = 619 papers) and from participants in the "iLIVE" project (10 countries: 101 patients, 37 family members, 63 clinicians), followed by a two-round Delphi study, and a consensus meeting.

Setting/participants: Clinicians, researchers, family members, and patient representatives from 20 countries participated in the Delphi Rounds 1 (n = 462) and 2 (n = 355). Thirty-two participants attended the consensus meeting.

Results: From the systematic review and the cohort study we identified 256 and 238 outcomes respectively, from which we extracted a 52-outcome list covering areas related to the patients' physical, psychosocial, and spiritual dimensions, family support, place of care and care delivery, relational aspects of care, and general concepts. A preliminary 13-outcome list reached consensus during the Delphi. At the consensus meeting, a 14-item Core Outcome Set was ratified by the participants.

Conclusions: This study involved a large and diverse sample of key stakeholders in defining the core outcome set for best care for the dying person, focusing on the last days of life. By actively integrating the perspectives of family carers and patient representatives from various cultural backgrounds this Core Outcome Set enriches our understanding of essential elements of care for the dying and provides a solid foundation for advancing quality of end-of-life care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为临终者设定最佳护理的核心结果:国际德尔菲研究和共识会议的结果。
研究背景:结果测量对推进临床实践和改善患者护理至关重要。目的:为临终者制定最佳护理的核心结果集。设计:我们遵循有效性试验核心结果测量(COMET)倡议指南,其中包括通过系统文献综述(n = 619篇论文)和“iLIVE”项目参与者(10个国家:101名患者,37名家庭成员,63名临床医生)确定潜在结果,然后进行两轮德尔菲研究和共识会议。环境/参与者:来自20个国家的临床医生、研究人员、家属和患者代表参加了德尔菲第1轮(n = 462)和第2轮(n = 355)。32位与会者出席了协商一致会议。结果:从系统评价和队列研究中,我们分别确定了256个和238个结果,从中我们提取了52个结果列表,涵盖了与患者身体、社会心理和精神维度、家庭支持、护理地点和护理交付、护理关系方面和一般概念相关的领域。初步的13项成果清单在德尔菲会议期间达成了共识。在协商一致会议上,与会者批准了一套14项核心成果。结论:这项研究涉及了大量不同的关键利益相关者样本,以确定临终者最佳护理的核心结果集,重点是生命的最后几天。通过积极整合来自不同文化背景的家庭照顾者和患者代表的观点,这套核心结果集丰富了我们对临终关怀基本要素的理解,并为提高临终关怀的质量提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Working with people living with motor neurone disease and the impact on professionals' emotional and psychological well-being: A scoping review. A scoping review of global patterns in reporting race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion in palliative care randomized controlled trials: Recommendations for transparency. Changes in perception of prognosis in the last year of life of patients with advanced cancer and its associated factors: Longitudinal results of the eQuiPe study. Challenges of regional hospice and palliative care networks: A group discussion study with coordinators and network experts. Community out-of-hours palliative care - 'It's a patchwork of services': A qualitative study exploring care provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1