Factors associated with emergency medical clinicians leaving EMS.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2436047
Christopher B Gage, Christine B Cooke, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Jordan D Kurth, Shea van den Bergh, Ashish R Panchal
{"title":"Factors associated with emergency medical clinicians leaving EMS.","authors":"Christopher B Gage, Christine B Cooke, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Jordan D Kurth, Shea van den Bergh, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2436047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many United States (U.S.) communities face challenges with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workforce turnover. The demands created by the pandemic have worsened the stressors EMS clinicians face, possibly changing the drivers of workforce turnover. Our study aims to understand the factors associated with Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics' likelihood of leaving EMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally registered civilian EMTs and paramedics ages 18-85 from October 2021 to April 2022. After recertifying their National EMS certification, respondents were invited to complete a survey regarding their primary role, additional jobs, and the likelihood of leaving EMS in the next 12 months. If likely to leave, reasons for leaving were collected and evaluated for the top reasons. Multivariable logistic regression modeling (OR, 95% CI) was used to describe the odds of being likely to leave in 12 months, adjusted for age, agency type, education level, primary role, and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,671 (response rate-25.9%) EMTs and paramedics were included in the analysis, with 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, reporting they were likely to leave EMS in 12 months. The EMTs likely to leave were younger (median age 32 vs. 37) and had fewer years with main EMS job (median 3 vs. 4) than paramedics. A lower proportion of EMTs were male (68.8% vs. 78.6%) and non-Hispanic White (79.8% vs. 87.6%). The EMTs were less likely full-time (65.6% vs. 87.5%) and held fewer EMS jobs (23.4% vs. 32.3%). The EMTs and paramedics reported stress as the most significant reason for leaving (27.9% and 38.8%, respectively), followed by COVID-19 (12.9% and 19.3%) and education (18.3% and 6.4%). Those dissatisfied had significantly higher odds of leaving (11.91 and 13.46, respectively). The EMTs and paramedics in hospitals (OR = 2.32, OR = 2.37), private (OR = 2.72, OR = 2.38), and government non-fire (OR = 2.22, OR = 1.98) agencies were likelier to leave than fire agencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although increased stress and pandemic-related factors are most common reasons reported for being likely to leave EMS, job dissatisfaction was the most impactful factor. A better understanding of factors that drive job satisfaction needs evaluation to develop strategies to enhance retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2436047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Many United States (U.S.) communities face challenges with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workforce turnover. The demands created by the pandemic have worsened the stressors EMS clinicians face, possibly changing the drivers of workforce turnover. Our study aims to understand the factors associated with Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics' likelihood of leaving EMS.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally registered civilian EMTs and paramedics ages 18-85 from October 2021 to April 2022. After recertifying their National EMS certification, respondents were invited to complete a survey regarding their primary role, additional jobs, and the likelihood of leaving EMS in the next 12 months. If likely to leave, reasons for leaving were collected and evaluated for the top reasons. Multivariable logistic regression modeling (OR, 95% CI) was used to describe the odds of being likely to leave in 12 months, adjusted for age, agency type, education level, primary role, and job satisfaction.

Results: A total of 29,671 (response rate-25.9%) EMTs and paramedics were included in the analysis, with 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, reporting they were likely to leave EMS in 12 months. The EMTs likely to leave were younger (median age 32 vs. 37) and had fewer years with main EMS job (median 3 vs. 4) than paramedics. A lower proportion of EMTs were male (68.8% vs. 78.6%) and non-Hispanic White (79.8% vs. 87.6%). The EMTs were less likely full-time (65.6% vs. 87.5%) and held fewer EMS jobs (23.4% vs. 32.3%). The EMTs and paramedics reported stress as the most significant reason for leaving (27.9% and 38.8%, respectively), followed by COVID-19 (12.9% and 19.3%) and education (18.3% and 6.4%). Those dissatisfied had significantly higher odds of leaving (11.91 and 13.46, respectively). The EMTs and paramedics in hospitals (OR = 2.32, OR = 2.37), private (OR = 2.72, OR = 2.38), and government non-fire (OR = 2.22, OR = 1.98) agencies were likelier to leave than fire agencies.

Conclusion: Although increased stress and pandemic-related factors are most common reasons reported for being likely to leave EMS, job dissatisfaction was the most impactful factor. A better understanding of factors that drive job satisfaction needs evaluation to develop strategies to enhance retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
An analysis of 24-hour survival based on arrival by atypical ground transport versus ground emergency medical services. Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care: Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP. Community Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prehospital Antiarrhythmic Practices. Factors associated with emergency medical clinicians leaving EMS. Smartphone-Enabled Point-of-Care Testing for Prehospital Stroke Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1