{"title":"Prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia on postoperative outcomes in patients with biliary tract cancer.","authors":"Tomonari Shimagaki, Keishi Sugimachi, Takahiro Tomino, Emi Onishi, Naomichi Koga, Yuta Kasagi, Masahiko Sugiyama, Yasue Kimura, Masaru Morita","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02972-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frailty, characterized by sarcopenia and osteopenia, is associated with poor survival after the resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Osteosarcopenia, the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteopenia, has recently been associated with poor outcomes in various cancers. This study assessed the prognostic value of osteosarcopenia after the resection of BTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 109 patients who underwent BTC resection between 2014 and 2021 for the following conditions: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 21), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 16), distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 32), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 17), and ampullary carcinoma (n = 23). Sarcopenia was evaluated using computed tomography of the psoas muscle at the third lumbar vertebra, while osteopenia was measured using bone mineral density at the 11th thoracic vertebra. Osteosarcopenia was defined as the presence of both the conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia was present in 54 patients (50%), osteopenia in 50 patients (46%), and osteosarcopenia in 30 patients (28%). Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with osteosarcopenia. A multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0278), poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.0027), and osteosarcopenia (p = 0.0436) were independent predictors of poor disease-free survival. Osteosarcopenia was also a significant predictor of poor overall survival (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteosarcopenia serves as a prognostic factor for poor outcomes after BTC resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02972-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Frailty, characterized by sarcopenia and osteopenia, is associated with poor survival after the resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Osteosarcopenia, the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteopenia, has recently been associated with poor outcomes in various cancers. This study assessed the prognostic value of osteosarcopenia after the resection of BTC.
Methods: We analyzed 109 patients who underwent BTC resection between 2014 and 2021 for the following conditions: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 21), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 16), distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 32), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 17), and ampullary carcinoma (n = 23). Sarcopenia was evaluated using computed tomography of the psoas muscle at the third lumbar vertebra, while osteopenia was measured using bone mineral density at the 11th thoracic vertebra. Osteosarcopenia was defined as the presence of both the conditions.
Results: Sarcopenia was present in 54 patients (50%), osteopenia in 50 patients (46%), and osteosarcopenia in 30 patients (28%). Lymph node metastasis is common in patients with osteosarcopenia. A multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0278), poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.0027), and osteosarcopenia (p = 0.0436) were independent predictors of poor disease-free survival. Osteosarcopenia was also a significant predictor of poor overall survival (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Osteosarcopenia serves as a prognostic factor for poor outcomes after BTC resection.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.