Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the NeuMoDx™ CT/NG Assay 2.0.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002075
B Van Der Pol, A Avery, S N Taylor, J Miller, C L Emery, A English, G B Lazenby, R Lillis, J Ruth, D Young, S Young, S Chavoustie, L Crane, V Reid, G Wall, S Johnson
{"title":"Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the NeuMoDx™ CT/NG Assay 2.0.","authors":"B Van Der Pol, A Avery, S N Taylor, J Miller, C L Emery, A English, G B Lazenby, R Lillis, J Ruth, D Young, S Young, S Chavoustie, L Crane, V Reid, G Wall, S Johnson","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the continued increases in rates of both Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection, additional diagnostic assays may be useful in increasing access to testing for these sexually transmitted infections. We evaluated the performance of the NeuMoDx™ CT/NG Assay 2.0 on the NeuMoDx-96 and NeuMoDx-288 Molecular Systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay was assessed when used with: 1) endocervical swabs; 2) self-, and clinician-collected vaginal swabs; and 3) first-catch urine specimens (female and male). Results were compared to a patient infection status based on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. All specimen types other than endocervical swabs had >95% sensitivity and > 99% specificity for both pathogens. For endocervical samples, sensitivity was 93.2% and 93.3% for CT and NG, respectively. There was no difference in performance based on platform. The frequency of invalid results was low (<1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated performance similar to currently FDA-cleared assays, with the added choice of a moderate- (96-sample) or a high-throughput (288-sample) platform. The system therefore offers solutions to laboratories running lower volumes of testing that may obviate the need for outsourcing to larger reference laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the continued increases in rates of both Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection, additional diagnostic assays may be useful in increasing access to testing for these sexually transmitted infections. We evaluated the performance of the NeuMoDx™ CT/NG Assay 2.0 on the NeuMoDx-96 and NeuMoDx-288 Molecular Systems.

Methods: The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay was assessed when used with: 1) endocervical swabs; 2) self-, and clinician-collected vaginal swabs; and 3) first-catch urine specimens (female and male). Results were compared to a patient infection status based on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assays.

Results: The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. All specimen types other than endocervical swabs had >95% sensitivity and > 99% specificity for both pathogens. For endocervical samples, sensitivity was 93.2% and 93.3% for CT and NG, respectively. There was no difference in performance based on platform. The frequency of invalid results was low (<1%).

Conclusions: The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated performance similar to currently FDA-cleared assays, with the added choice of a moderate- (96-sample) or a high-throughput (288-sample) platform. The system therefore offers solutions to laboratories running lower volumes of testing that may obviate the need for outsourcing to larger reference laboratories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Willingness of Joining Online Support Groups Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV in Shandong Province of China: A Mixed Methods Study. Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Opt-Out Screening of Justice-Involved Women During Intake at the Los Angeles County Jail: The Pivotal Role of Correctional Health Systems. Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019. Multilevel Drivers of Congenital Syphilis, Oregon, 2013 to 2021. Clinical Studies Are Needed to Determine the Efficacy of Ceftriaxone and Other Interventions in Addressing Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1