Temmy L T Lo, Ian C H Leung, Lydia L W Leung, Paul P Y Chan, Rainbow T H Ho
{"title":"Assessing sleep metrics in stroke survivors: a comparison between objective and subjective measures.","authors":"Temmy L T Lo, Ian C H Leung, Lydia L W Leung, Paul P Y Chan, Rainbow T H Ho","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03212-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke survivors are at risk of sleep disturbance, which can be reflected in discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep measures. Given there are limited studies on this phenomenon and using portable monitoring devices is more convenient for stroke survivors to monitor their sleep, this study aimed to compare objectively measured (Belun Ring) and subjectively reported (sleep diary) sleep metrics (total sleep time (TST) and wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO)) in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, thirty-five participants wore a ring-shaped pulse oximeter (Belun Ring) and kept a sleep diary for three consecutive nights in one week. The effects of various factors on TST and WASO were analyzed by linear mixed models. Systematic bias between two measures was examined by the Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TST and WASO were significantly affected by measures (p <.001), but not night. TST was significantly lower and WASO was significantly higher in the Belun Ring than in the sleep diary (p <.05). Age was the only covariate that had a significant effect on WASO (p <.05). The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated positive bias in TST (29.55%; 95% CI [16.57%, 42.53%]) and negative bias in WASO (-117.35%; 95% CI [-137.65%, -97.06%]). Proportional bias was exhibited in WASO only (r =.31, p <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings revealed discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep measures in stroke survivors. It is recommended that objective measures be included when assessing and monitoring their sleep conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03212-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke survivors are at risk of sleep disturbance, which can be reflected in discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep measures. Given there are limited studies on this phenomenon and using portable monitoring devices is more convenient for stroke survivors to monitor their sleep, this study aimed to compare objectively measured (Belun Ring) and subjectively reported (sleep diary) sleep metrics (total sleep time (TST) and wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO)) in stroke survivors.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, thirty-five participants wore a ring-shaped pulse oximeter (Belun Ring) and kept a sleep diary for three consecutive nights in one week. The effects of various factors on TST and WASO were analyzed by linear mixed models. Systematic bias between two measures was examined by the Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: TST and WASO were significantly affected by measures (p <.001), but not night. TST was significantly lower and WASO was significantly higher in the Belun Ring than in the sleep diary (p <.05). Age was the only covariate that had a significant effect on WASO (p <.05). The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated positive bias in TST (29.55%; 95% CI [16.57%, 42.53%]) and negative bias in WASO (-117.35%; 95% CI [-137.65%, -97.06%]). Proportional bias was exhibited in WASO only (r =.31, p <.05).
Conclusion: The findings revealed discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep measures in stroke survivors. It is recommended that objective measures be included when assessing and monitoring their sleep conditions.
期刊介绍：
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
