Medical Resident Perceptions of Distress during Training.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001766
Simone A Bernstein, Janice L Hanson, Emily A Slat, Jennifer G Duncan
{"title":"Medical Resident Perceptions of Distress during Training.","authors":"Simone A Bernstein, Janice L Hanson, Emily A Slat, Jennifer G Duncan","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study used a qualitative research approach to grounded theory to identify factors that contributed to resident distress during 2021-2022 in multiple different specialties and at different postgraduate years of residency. By better understanding these contributors to distress, the aim was to inform the design of optimal interventions to reduce burnout and other emotional distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The residents enrolled in this study completed a demographic survey and semistructured interview. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data analysis included developing codes inductively, grouping codes into categories, and describing themes. Recruitment continued until data analysis indicated theoretical saturation/sufficiency had been reached. A qualitative research approach to grounded theory was used to identify themes and relationships among themes to better understand how the sources of distress affected the trainees of various specialties and postgraduate levels of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three participants (15 medical-based, 9 hospital-based, and 9 surgical-based residents) participated in interviews between 2021 and 2022. Seven themes described sources of distress and potential ameliorating factors: workload, support and community, culture, resident outlook, institutional resources, work-life balance, and coronavirus disease 2019. The grounded theory highlights that these factors can collectively influence work-life balance and distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of the grounded theory qualitative analysis were used to examine ways to better mitigate the sources of distress that the residents enrolled in this study described. As institutions strive to diminish distress among residents, they can consider opportunities to assess environmental factors and design targeted interventions for their institutions or programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 12","pages":"719-724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study used a qualitative research approach to grounded theory to identify factors that contributed to resident distress during 2021-2022 in multiple different specialties and at different postgraduate years of residency. By better understanding these contributors to distress, the aim was to inform the design of optimal interventions to reduce burnout and other emotional distress.

Methods: The residents enrolled in this study completed a demographic survey and semistructured interview. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data analysis included developing codes inductively, grouping codes into categories, and describing themes. Recruitment continued until data analysis indicated theoretical saturation/sufficiency had been reached. A qualitative research approach to grounded theory was used to identify themes and relationships among themes to better understand how the sources of distress affected the trainees of various specialties and postgraduate levels of training.

Results: Thirty-three participants (15 medical-based, 9 hospital-based, and 9 surgical-based residents) participated in interviews between 2021 and 2022. Seven themes described sources of distress and potential ameliorating factors: workload, support and community, culture, resident outlook, institutional resources, work-life balance, and coronavirus disease 2019. The grounded theory highlights that these factors can collectively influence work-life balance and distress.

Conclusions: The findings of the grounded theory qualitative analysis were used to examine ways to better mitigate the sources of distress that the residents enrolled in this study described. As institutions strive to diminish distress among residents, they can consider opportunities to assess environmental factors and design targeted interventions for their institutions or programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院医师在训练期间对痛苦的感知。
目的:本研究采用扎根理论的定性研究方法,确定2021-2022年期间多个不同专业和不同研究生居住年限的居民困扰因素。通过更好地了解这些造成痛苦的因素,目的是为设计最佳干预措施提供信息,以减少倦怠和其他情绪困扰。方法:采用人口统计调查和半结构式访谈对住院医师进行调查。采访被记录下来并记录下来。数据分析包括归纳开发代码、将代码分组、描述主题。继续征聘,直到数据分析表明已达到理论上的饱和/充足。采用扎根理论的定性研究方法来确定主题和主题之间的关系,以更好地了解痛苦的来源如何影响不同专业和研究生培训水平的学员。结果:33名参与者(15名医学基础,9名医院基础和9名外科基础住院医师)在2021年至2022年期间参加了访谈。七个主题描述了困扰的来源和潜在的改善因素:工作量、支持和社区、文化、居民前景、机构资源、工作与生活平衡和2019冠状病毒病。扎根理论强调,这些因素可以共同影响工作与生活的平衡和痛苦。结论:本研究采用扎根理论定性分析的结果,探讨如何更好地减轻参与本研究的居民所描述的痛苦来源。当机构努力减少居民的痛苦时,他们可以考虑评估环境因素的机会,并为他们的机构或项目设计有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Critical Illness Survivors and after Hospitalization. Combating Racism: Effects of a Longitudinal Community-Based Curriculum at the Graduate Medical Level. Impact of Rounding Setting on the Quality of Medical Trainee Experience. Assessing Food Insecurity in Primary Care: A Comparison Between an Internal Medicine- and a Student-Run Clinic. Diagnosis versus Hypothesis: Optimal Terminology to Enhance Clinical Reasoning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1