[Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)].

Y Li, J R Liu, J Li, W M Chen
{"title":"[Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)].","authors":"Y Li, J R Liu, J Li, W M Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240814-00303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t (14;16) abnormality. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data from 564 patients diagnosed with initial MM from January 2018 to November 2020 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The prognoses of patients with t (14;16) were analyzed and compared with the prognoses of patients with normal FISH, and those with t (4;14) and del (17p) . <b>Results:</b> Among 564 newly diagnosed MM patients, 19 (3.4%) exhibited t (14;16) abnormalities, with 14 cases diagnosed with 1q21+ and three cases with del (17p). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with t (14;16) were significantly shorter compared with patients with normal FISH (the median PFS: 14 months <i>vs</i> not reached, <i>P</i><0.001; the median OS: 42 months <i>vs</i> not reached, <i>P</i>=0.002). No statistically significant difference was detected in PFS and OS between the 15 patients with t (14;16) and the 15 with t (4;14) after propensity score matching (the median PFS: 13.0 months <i>vs</i> not reached, <i>P</i>=0.247; the median OS: 42 months <i>vs</i> not reached, <i>P</i>=0.609). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between 15 patients with t (14;16) and 15 with del (17p) (the median PFS: 13 months <i>vs</i> 31 months, <i>P</i>=0.939; the median OS: 42 months <i>vs</i> 37.3 months, <i>P</i>=0.557). Propensity score matching indicated that when combined with 1q21+, no statistically significant differences were present in PFS and OS between patients with t (14;16) and patients with t (4;14) or patients with del (17p) (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Whether or not the patients with t (14;16) had undergone auto-HSCT did not significantly impact the PFS and OS (all <i>P</i>>0.05) . <b>Conclusion:</b> t (14;16) is often associated with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in newly diagnosed MM patients, and its adverse prognostic value is similar to that of t (4;14) and del (17p) .</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"45 10","pages":"944-950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240814-00303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t (14;16) abnormality. Methods: Clinical data from 564 patients diagnosed with initial MM from January 2018 to November 2020 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The prognoses of patients with t (14;16) were analyzed and compared with the prognoses of patients with normal FISH, and those with t (4;14) and del (17p) . Results: Among 564 newly diagnosed MM patients, 19 (3.4%) exhibited t (14;16) abnormalities, with 14 cases diagnosed with 1q21+ and three cases with del (17p). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with t (14;16) were significantly shorter compared with patients with normal FISH (the median PFS: 14 months vs not reached, P<0.001; the median OS: 42 months vs not reached, P=0.002). No statistically significant difference was detected in PFS and OS between the 15 patients with t (14;16) and the 15 with t (4;14) after propensity score matching (the median PFS: 13.0 months vs not reached, P=0.247; the median OS: 42 months vs not reached, P=0.609). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between 15 patients with t (14;16) and 15 with del (17p) (the median PFS: 13 months vs 31 months, P=0.939; the median OS: 42 months vs 37.3 months, P=0.557). Propensity score matching indicated that when combined with 1q21+, no statistically significant differences were present in PFS and OS between patients with t (14;16) and patients with t (4;14) or patients with del (17p) (all P>0.05). Whether or not the patients with t (14;16) had undergone auto-HSCT did not significantly impact the PFS and OS (all P>0.05) . Conclusion: t (14;16) is often associated with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in newly diagnosed MM patients, and its adverse prognostic value is similar to that of t (4;14) and del (17p) .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
[Research on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of children with chronic myeloid leukemia in the blast phase]. [Single-center study of COVID-19 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia]. [The advancement of cuproptosis in hematological tumors]. [Phylogenetic analysis and pathogenesis study of a new deletion mutation causing inherited FⅩ deficiency]. [Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1