[A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization for the treatment of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis].

Y Q Li, G G Wang, Y J Wang, T Tao, Z Y Zhang, D Zheng, Y Chen, Z Z Jia, J W Zhao
{"title":"[A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization for the treatment of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis].","authors":"Y Q Li, G G Wang, Y J Wang, T Tao, Z Y Zhang, D Zheng, Y Chen, Z Z Jia, J W Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To assess the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). <b>Methods:</b> Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect literatures related to KOA, GAE and therapeutic effects. The search period was from the inception of the databases to July 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. Data extracted included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, and the incidence of adverse events, followed by a meta-analysis using STATA 15.1 software. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 papers involving 332 patients (419 knees) from 11 studies were included according to the Na-row criteria. The technical success rate was 100%. The standardized mean differences of VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were -2.42(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.89--1.95), -2.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-2.94--1.93), -2.57(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.13--2.01), and -2.60(95%<i>CI</i>:-3.37--1.84), respectively, all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001); the weighted mean difference of WOMAC total score at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were -24.44(95%<i>CI</i>:-29.13--19.75), -28.30(95%<i>CI</i>:-31.47--25.12), -30.66(95%<i>CI</i>:-32.94--28.37), and -34.23(95%<i>CI</i>:-44.39--24.07), all showing decreases (all <i>P</i><0.001). The incidence of adverse events mainly included skin color changes of 16.4%(95%<i>CI</i>: 5.5%-31.0%, <i>P</i><0.001) and hematoma at the puncture site 3.8%(95%<i>CI</i>: 1.1%-7.6%, <i>P</i><0.001), with the majority being mild and self-resolving. <b>Conclusions:</b> GAE treatment for KOA secondary pain has good efficacy and safety, providing a new treatment option for KOA patients as a minimally invasive procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 45","pages":"4162-4170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240825-01960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of genicular artery embolization (GAE) in the management of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Wanfang databases to collect literatures related to KOA, GAE and therapeutic effects. The search period was from the inception of the databases to July 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. Data extracted included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) scores, and the incidence of adverse events, followed by a meta-analysis using STATA 15.1 software. Results: A total of 11 papers involving 332 patients (419 knees) from 11 studies were included according to the Na-row criteria. The technical success rate was 100%. The standardized mean differences of VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were -2.42(95%CI:-2.89--1.95), -2.44(95%CI:-2.94--1.93), -2.57(95%CI:-3.13--2.01), and -2.60(95%CI:-3.37--1.84), respectively, all showing decreases (all P<0.001); the weighted mean difference of WOMAC total score at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were -24.44(95%CI:-29.13--19.75), -28.30(95%CI:-31.47--25.12), -30.66(95%CI:-32.94--28.37), and -34.23(95%CI:-44.39--24.07), all showing decreases (all P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events mainly included skin color changes of 16.4%(95%CI: 5.5%-31.0%, P<0.001) and hematoma at the puncture site 3.8%(95%CI: 1.1%-7.6%, P<0.001), with the majority being mild and self-resolving. Conclusions: GAE treatment for KOA secondary pain has good efficacy and safety, providing a new treatment option for KOA patients as a minimally invasive procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[A prospective phase Ⅱ clinical trial of toripalimab combined with platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer]. [Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma]. [Application of robot-assisted laparoscopic isthmectomy for the treatment of symptomatic horseshoe kidney]. [Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with TP53 mutation]. [Comparison of microdrill versus diode laser in endoscopic stapedotomy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1