From pandemic to participation: A two-year follow-up of blood donors in the Netherlands who registered during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1111/trf.18079
Femmeke J Prinsze, Eva-Maria Merz, Marloes L C Spekman
{"title":"From pandemic to participation: A two-year follow-up of blood donors in the Netherlands who registered during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Femmeke J Prinsze, Eva-Maria Merz, Marloes L C Spekman","doi":"10.1111/trf.18079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021), people were urged to minimize movements. Nevertheless, the Netherlands observed a huge increase in new donor registrations in early 2020. It is unclear whether such \"pandemic\" donors are willing to become repeat donors. The aim of this study was to analyze the donation behavior of these \"pandemic\" donors during 2 years after registration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All donors registered in weeks 11-20 of 2020 were followed for 2 years and their turnout for the new donor screening (NDS), their first-time donation (FTD), their donation(s) in the follow-up period, and their availability at the end of the follow-up period was compared with donors registered in weeks 11-20 of the previous years, 2017-2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 26,463 donors registered during week 11-20 in 2020; more than double as in the same period in previous years. Their turnout for the NDS (80%) and FTD (60%) was like donors registered in 2017-2019. On the longer term, we saw lower donor availability with a shift in number of whole blood and plasma donations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>During the first phase of the pandemic, more people registered than usual. Their show rates for the NDS and the FTD were comparable with previous years, suggesting that \"pandemic\" donors show identical behavior as regular donors. On the long term, however, donation behavior differed (lower return rates and shift in donation types). Further research is needed to disentangle impacts of the pandemic especially on the long-term changes as they happened simultaneously with policy and recruitment changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021), people were urged to minimize movements. Nevertheless, the Netherlands observed a huge increase in new donor registrations in early 2020. It is unclear whether such "pandemic" donors are willing to become repeat donors. The aim of this study was to analyze the donation behavior of these "pandemic" donors during 2 years after registration.

Methods: All donors registered in weeks 11-20 of 2020 were followed for 2 years and their turnout for the new donor screening (NDS), their first-time donation (FTD), their donation(s) in the follow-up period, and their availability at the end of the follow-up period was compared with donors registered in weeks 11-20 of the previous years, 2017-2019.

Results: Totally 26,463 donors registered during week 11-20 in 2020; more than double as in the same period in previous years. Their turnout for the NDS (80%) and FTD (60%) was like donors registered in 2017-2019. On the longer term, we saw lower donor availability with a shift in number of whole blood and plasma donations.

Discussion: During the first phase of the pandemic, more people registered than usual. Their show rates for the NDS and the FTD were comparable with previous years, suggesting that "pandemic" donors show identical behavior as regular donors. On the long term, however, donation behavior differed (lower return rates and shift in donation types). Further research is needed to disentangle impacts of the pandemic especially on the long-term changes as they happened simultaneously with policy and recruitment changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从大流行到参与:对在第一波COVID-19大流行期间登记的荷兰献血者进行为期两年的随访。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行高峰期(2020-2021年),人们被敦促尽量减少流动。尽管如此,荷兰在2020年初的新捐助者登记数量大幅增加。目前尚不清楚这些“流行病”捐助者是否愿意成为重复捐助者。本研究的目的是分析这些“流行病”捐赠者在登记后2年内的捐赠行为。方法:对所有在2020年11-20周登记的献血者进行为期2年的随访,并将其参与新献血者筛查(NDS)、首次捐赠(FTD)、随访期间捐赠(s)以及随访结束时的可用性与前几年(2017-2019年)11-20周登记的献血者进行比较。结果:2020年第11-20周共登记26463名献血者;是前几年同期的两倍多。他们对民主民主党(80%)和自由民主党(60%)的投票率与2017-2019年登记的捐助者相当。从长期来看,我们看到随着全血和血浆捐献数量的变化,献血者的可用性降低。讨论:在大流行的第一阶段,登记的人数比平时多。他们对国家发展计划和对外发展计划的捐助率与前几年相当,这表明“流行病”捐助者与常规捐助者表现出相同的行为。然而,从长期来看,捐赠行为有所不同(回报率较低,捐赠类型发生变化)。需要进一步研究,以理清大流行的影响,特别是对长期变化的影响,因为它们与政策和招聘变化同时发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Deglycerolization of manually glycerolized, frozen red cell concentrates using a closed system cell processor. Genetic background of anti-CD99 producers in Japan and analysis of hemolytic transfusion reactions due to anti-CD99. Misoprostol administration mimicking a febrile transfusion reaction. Low-titer group O whole blood implementation in a tertiary care hospital in Estonia. Quality of whole blood stored in room temperature for up to 5 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1