Move or Not to Move: Factors of Mind-Body Practice Engagement in a Population-Based Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1089/jicm.2024.0288
My Ngoc To, Nicole Nicotera, Kaipeng Wang
{"title":"Move or Not to Move: Factors of Mind-Body Practice Engagement in a Population-Based Study.","authors":"My Ngoc To, Nicole Nicotera, Kaipeng Wang","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Mind-body practices (MBPs), which include seated- (meditation) and movement-based practices (yoga, Tai Chi, <i>qigong</i>), have grown increasingly popular in the United States for improving mental and physical wellness. While literature has identified socioeconomic and health-related factors related to seated- and movement-MBP engagement separately, no studies have explored the factors associated with combined-MBP use. This study accordingly used Anderson's behavioral model of health service utilization to explore sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with seated-, movement-, and combined-MBP engagement among a representative adult sample in the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression using survey weights examined associations between predisposing (<i>race-ethnicity</i>, <i>age</i>, <i>geographic region</i>, <i>sex</i>, <i>sexual minority status</i>, and <i>marital status</i>), enabling (<i>educational attainment</i>, <i>income</i>, <i>having continuous health insurance coverage</i>, and <i>having flexible spending accounts</i>), and needs factors (<i>psychological distress</i>, <i>self-reported health</i>, <i>and chronic pain</i>) with type of MBP engagement. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nearly 6% (5.8%) of the U.S. adult population practiced combined-MBPs. Results also showed that educational attainment was associated with increasingly higher odds of utilizing all forms of MBPs and revealed racial-ethnic disparities in movement- and combined-MBP engagement. Combined-MBP engagement was roughly two times higher among those with moderate psychological distress (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-2.32; <i>p</i> < 0.001), severe psychological distress (RRR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35-2.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and chronic pain. <b><i>Conclusions and Implications:</i></b> Findings suggest that combined-MBPs are utilized by a significant portion of the U.S. population and that engagement has varied distribution across sociodemographic and health factors. Considering the association of combined-MBP usage with mental and physical health needs, the authors recommend that health care providers suggest combined-MBPs as an additional resource for patients with psychological distress or mild chronic pain. Future practice and research can focus on increasing accessibility to MBPs in education settings to reduce racial-ethnic disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mind-body practices (MBPs), which include seated- (meditation) and movement-based practices (yoga, Tai Chi, qigong), have grown increasingly popular in the United States for improving mental and physical wellness. While literature has identified socioeconomic and health-related factors related to seated- and movement-MBP engagement separately, no studies have explored the factors associated with combined-MBP use. This study accordingly used Anderson's behavioral model of health service utilization to explore sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with seated-, movement-, and combined-MBP engagement among a representative adult sample in the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. Methods: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression using survey weights examined associations between predisposing (race-ethnicity, age, geographic region, sex, sexual minority status, and marital status), enabling (educational attainment, income, having continuous health insurance coverage, and having flexible spending accounts), and needs factors (psychological distress, self-reported health, and chronic pain) with type of MBP engagement. Results: Nearly 6% (5.8%) of the U.S. adult population practiced combined-MBPs. Results also showed that educational attainment was associated with increasingly higher odds of utilizing all forms of MBPs and revealed racial-ethnic disparities in movement- and combined-MBP engagement. Combined-MBP engagement was roughly two times higher among those with moderate psychological distress (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-2.32; p < 0.001), severe psychological distress (RRR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35-2.85; p < 0.001), and chronic pain. Conclusions and Implications: Findings suggest that combined-MBPs are utilized by a significant portion of the U.S. population and that engagement has varied distribution across sociodemographic and health factors. Considering the association of combined-MBP usage with mental and physical health needs, the authors recommend that health care providers suggest combined-MBPs as an additional resource for patients with psychological distress or mild chronic pain. Future practice and research can focus on increasing accessibility to MBPs in education settings to reduce racial-ethnic disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动或不运动:一项基于人群的研究中身心练习参与的因素。
背景:身心练习(MBPs),包括静坐(冥想)和基于动作的练习(瑜伽、太极、气功),在美国越来越流行,以改善身心健康。虽然文献已经分别确定了与坐姿和运动- mbp参与相关的社会经济和健康因素,但没有研究探索与联合mbp使用相关的因素。因此,本研究使用安德森的卫生服务利用行为模型,在2017年全国健康访谈调查的代表性成人样本中,探索与坐姿、运动和组合mbp参与相关的社会人口统计学和健康相关因素。方法:采用描述性统计方法对样本特征进行总结。使用调查权重的多项式逻辑回归检验了易感因素(种族、民族、年龄、地理区域、性别、性少数地位和婚姻状况)、使能因素(受教育程度、收入、连续健康保险覆盖和灵活支出账户)和需求因素(心理困扰、自我报告的健康状况和慢性疼痛)与MBP参与类型之间的关联。结果:近6%(5.8%)的美国成年人实行联合mbps。研究结果还显示,受教育程度与使用各种形式的MBPs的可能性越来越高有关,并揭示了在移动和组合mbp参与方面的种族差异。在中度心理困扰的患者中,联合mbp参与程度大约高出两倍(相对风险比[RRR] = 1.92;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.58-2.32;p < 0.001),严重的心理困扰(RRR = 1.96;95% ci: 1.35-2.85;P < 0.001),慢性疼痛。结论和意义:研究结果表明,美国人口中有很大一部分使用了联合mbps,并且参与程度在社会人口和健康因素中具有不同的分布。考虑到联合mbps使用与精神和身体健康需求的关联,作者建议卫生保健提供者建议联合mbps作为心理困扰或轻度慢性疼痛患者的额外资源。未来的实践和研究可以侧重于在教育环境中增加MBPs的可及性,以减少种族间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: Particularities, Challenges, Obstacles, and Misunderstandings. Part 2: Things Can also Work Differently when the Context is Different. Integration of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in the Institutionalization of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making: The World Health Organization Meeting Report. Instruments for Evaluating Undergraduate Medical Education in Complementary and Integrative Medicine: A Systematic Review. Australian Naturopaths Approach to the Clinical Management of Patients Presenting with Sleep Disorders. Populational Uses of Complementary Therapies via a Digital Platform in France: Motivations and Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1