[Spatial Relationship between Eco-environment Quality and Land Use Change in Guangdong Province-Hong Kong-Macao, China Based on Remote Sensing-based Ecological Index].

Q2 Environmental Science 环境科学 Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202310211
Zhi-Yong Chen, Yao-Wei Wu, Gang-Te Lin, Jian-Zhou Gong
{"title":"[Spatial Relationship between Eco-environment Quality and Land Use Change in Guangdong Province-Hong Kong-Macao, China Based on Remote Sensing-based Ecological Index].","authors":"Zhi-Yong Chen, Yao-Wei Wu, Gang-Te Lin, Jian-Zhou Gong","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202310211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change is an important guarantee for regional sustainable development. Guangdong Province-Hong Kong-Macao have always been closely linked and are now entering a period of accelerated development, but there is a lack of research on the spatial relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change integrated among the three places. Based on historical land use data and Google earth engine (GEE), MODIS images from the summer of 2000 to 2020 (from June 1 to September 1) were selected (with a time span of five years). The remote sensing-based ecological index (RSEI) was calculated to characterize the status of eco-environment quality and explore the spatial relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change. The results showed that: ① The land use type in the study area was mainly forest land, which was the base of the northern ecological development area (ecological area) and the northwestern landscape of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (the Greater Bay Area). The land use degree presented a spatial pattern of \"high in the middle, low in the periphery,\" \"high in the south and low in the north,\" and \"high in the southwest and northeast.\" The intensity of land use change was the least in the ecological area. ② According to RSEI, the regions with an eco-environment quality from low to high were the Greater Bay Area, the eastern wing of the coastal economic belt (east wing), the western wing of the coastal economic belt (west wing), and the ecological area. ③ There was a strong negative correlation between eco-environment quality and land use degree. The distribution range of high to low (H-L) cluster was relatively stable, mainly concentrated in the center of the Greater Bay Area, while the distribution of low to high (L-H) cluster was relatively unstable, mainly distributed in the ecological region, and there was no significant correlation between the eastern and western counties, Hong Kong and Macao. ④ The low-value patches of ecological environment quality in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao centers were consistent with artificial surface expansion. The center of Foshan in Guangzhou, the eastern part of Shantou, and the southwestern part of Zhanjiang were mainly coupled, while the ecological area, the central part of the east wing, the eastern part of the west wing, and the northwestern part of the Greater Bay Area were mainly uncoupled. Land use change and eco-environment quality were closely related in space. The eco-environment quality of the study area mainly presented a spatial pattern of \"high in the middle and low in the north\" and \"a certain low value in the east.\" The Greater Bay Area had the lowest eco-environment quality, followed by that of the eastern wing. In the past 20 years, the expansion of low-value eco-environment quality in the center of the Greater Bay Area had formed a continuous landscape base of low-value eco-environment quality. The ecological area had most of the high value areas of eco-environment quality, which provided a large area of ecological environment of good patches for the study area. From 2000 to 2020, there was a significant negative correlation between land use degree and eco-environment quality in the study area, with regional heterogeneity. Land use change is an important factor in the change in eco-environment quality, so it is necessary to focus on the whole planning and layout of land use structure to improve the eco-environment quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"45 11","pages":"6433-6447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change is an important guarantee for regional sustainable development. Guangdong Province-Hong Kong-Macao have always been closely linked and are now entering a period of accelerated development, but there is a lack of research on the spatial relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change integrated among the three places. Based on historical land use data and Google earth engine (GEE), MODIS images from the summer of 2000 to 2020 (from June 1 to September 1) were selected (with a time span of five years). The remote sensing-based ecological index (RSEI) was calculated to characterize the status of eco-environment quality and explore the spatial relationship between eco-environment quality and land use change. The results showed that: ① The land use type in the study area was mainly forest land, which was the base of the northern ecological development area (ecological area) and the northwestern landscape of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (the Greater Bay Area). The land use degree presented a spatial pattern of "high in the middle, low in the periphery," "high in the south and low in the north," and "high in the southwest and northeast." The intensity of land use change was the least in the ecological area. ② According to RSEI, the regions with an eco-environment quality from low to high were the Greater Bay Area, the eastern wing of the coastal economic belt (east wing), the western wing of the coastal economic belt (west wing), and the ecological area. ③ There was a strong negative correlation between eco-environment quality and land use degree. The distribution range of high to low (H-L) cluster was relatively stable, mainly concentrated in the center of the Greater Bay Area, while the distribution of low to high (L-H) cluster was relatively unstable, mainly distributed in the ecological region, and there was no significant correlation between the eastern and western counties, Hong Kong and Macao. ④ The low-value patches of ecological environment quality in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao centers were consistent with artificial surface expansion. The center of Foshan in Guangzhou, the eastern part of Shantou, and the southwestern part of Zhanjiang were mainly coupled, while the ecological area, the central part of the east wing, the eastern part of the west wing, and the northwestern part of the Greater Bay Area were mainly uncoupled. Land use change and eco-environment quality were closely related in space. The eco-environment quality of the study area mainly presented a spatial pattern of "high in the middle and low in the north" and "a certain low value in the east." The Greater Bay Area had the lowest eco-environment quality, followed by that of the eastern wing. In the past 20 years, the expansion of low-value eco-environment quality in the center of the Greater Bay Area had formed a continuous landscape base of low-value eco-environment quality. The ecological area had most of the high value areas of eco-environment quality, which provided a large area of ecological environment of good patches for the study area. From 2000 to 2020, there was a significant negative correlation between land use degree and eco-environment quality in the study area, with regional heterogeneity. Land use change is an important factor in the change in eco-environment quality, so it is necessary to focus on the whole planning and layout of land use structure to improve the eco-environment quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于遥感生态指数的粤港澳生态环境质量与土地利用变化的空间关系[j]。
生态环境质量与土地利用变化的关系是区域可持续发展的重要保障。粤港澳一直是紧密联系的区域,目前正处于加速发展时期,但对粤港澳生态环境质量与土地利用变化的空间关系的综合研究还比较缺乏。基于历史土地利用数据和谷歌earth engine (GEE),选取2000年夏季~ 2020年(6月1日~ 9月1日)MODIS影像(时间跨度为5年)。计算基于遥感的生态指数(RSEI),表征生态环境质量状况,探索生态环境质量与土地利用变化的空间关系。结果表明:①研究区土地利用类型以林地为主,是粤港澳大湾区北部生态发展区(生态区)和西北景观的基础。土地利用程度呈现“中部高、外围低”、“南高北低”、“西南东北高”的空间格局。生态区内土地利用变化强度最小。②生态环境质量由低到高依次为大湾区、沿海经济带东翼(东翼)、沿海经济带西翼(西翼)和生态区。③生态环境质量与土地利用程度呈显著负相关。高到低(H-L)集群的分布范围相对稳定,主要集中在大湾区中心,而低到高(L-H)集群的分布范围相对不稳定,主要分布在生态区,东西部县域和港澳之间不存在显著相关性。④粤港澳中心地区生态环境质量低值斑块与人工地表扩张相一致。广州佛山中心、汕头东部、湛江西南部以耦合为主,大湾区生态区、东翼中部、西翼东部、西北部以不耦合为主。土地利用变化与生态环境质量在空间上密切相关。研究区生态环境质量主要呈现“中部高、北部低”、“东部有一定的低值”的空间格局。大湾区生态环境质量最低,东翼次之。近20年来,大湾区中心低价值生态环境质量的扩张,形成了连续不断的低价值生态环境质量景观基地。研究区生态环境质量高值区居多,为研究区提供了大面积的良好斑块生态环境。2000 - 2020年,研究区土地利用程度与生态环境质量呈显著负相关,且存在区域异质性。土地利用变化是生态环境质量变化的重要因素,因此,必须注重土地利用结构的整体规划和布局,以改善生态环境质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Key Problems and Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Reduction in China's Wastewater Treatment Industry]. [Legacy Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Straw Degradation and Microbial Communities of the Aftercrop]. [Mechanisms of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Regulating Plant Root System Architecture in Acidic Soils]. [Meta-analysis of the Occurrence Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Microplastics in Agricultural Soil in China]. [Meta-analysis on the Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Soils].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1