mHealth Apps for Dementia Caregivers: Systematic Examination of Mobile Apps.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.2196/58517
Ning Zou, Bo Xie, Daqing He, Robin Hilsabeck, Alyssa Aguirre
{"title":"mHealth Apps for Dementia Caregivers: Systematic Examination of Mobile Apps.","authors":"Ning Zou, Bo Xie, Daqing He, Robin Hilsabeck, Alyssa Aguirre","doi":"10.2196/58517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal caregivers of persons living with dementia are increasingly using mobile health (mHealth) apps to obtain care information. mHealth apps are seen as promising tools to better support caregivers' complex and evolving information needs. Yet, little is known about the types and quality of dementia care information that these apps provide. Is this information for caregivers individually tailored; if so, how?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to address the aforementioned gaps in the literature by systematically examining the types and quality of care-related information provided in publicly available apps for caregivers of persons living with dementia as well as app features used to tailor information to caregivers' information wants and situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In September 2023, we used a multistage process to select mobile apps for caregivers of persons living with dementia. The final sample included 35 apps. We assessed (1) types of dementia care information provided in the apps, using our 3-item Alzheimer disease and related dementias daily care strategy framework, which encompasses educational information, tangible actions, and referral information; (2) quality of apps' care information, using the 11 indicators recommended by the National Library of Medicine; and (3) types of tailoring to provide personalization, feedback, and content matching, which are common tailoring strategies described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Educational information was the most prevalent type of information provided (29/35 apps, 83%), followed by information about tangible actions (18/35, 51%) and referrals (14/35, 40%). All apps presented their objectives clearly and avoided unrealistic or emotional claims. However, few provided information to explain whether the app's content was generated or reviewed by experts (7/35, 20%) or how its content was selected (4/35, 11%). Further, 6 of the 35 (17%) apps implemented 1 type of tailoring; of them, 4 (11%) used content matching and the other 2 (6%) used personalization. No app used 2 types of tailoring; only 2 (6%) used all 3 types (the third is feedback).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing dementia care apps do not provide sufficient high-quality, tailored information for informal caregivers. Caregivers should exercise caution when they use dementia care apps for informational support. Future research should focus on designing dementia care apps that incorporate quality-assured, transparency-enhanced, evidence-based artificial intelligence-enabled mHealth solutions for caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e58517"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informal caregivers of persons living with dementia are increasingly using mobile health (mHealth) apps to obtain care information. mHealth apps are seen as promising tools to better support caregivers' complex and evolving information needs. Yet, little is known about the types and quality of dementia care information that these apps provide. Is this information for caregivers individually tailored; if so, how?

Objective: We aim to address the aforementioned gaps in the literature by systematically examining the types and quality of care-related information provided in publicly available apps for caregivers of persons living with dementia as well as app features used to tailor information to caregivers' information wants and situations.

Methods: In September 2023, we used a multistage process to select mobile apps for caregivers of persons living with dementia. The final sample included 35 apps. We assessed (1) types of dementia care information provided in the apps, using our 3-item Alzheimer disease and related dementias daily care strategy framework, which encompasses educational information, tangible actions, and referral information; (2) quality of apps' care information, using the 11 indicators recommended by the National Library of Medicine; and (3) types of tailoring to provide personalization, feedback, and content matching, which are common tailoring strategies described in the literature.

Results: Educational information was the most prevalent type of information provided (29/35 apps, 83%), followed by information about tangible actions (18/35, 51%) and referrals (14/35, 40%). All apps presented their objectives clearly and avoided unrealistic or emotional claims. However, few provided information to explain whether the app's content was generated or reviewed by experts (7/35, 20%) or how its content was selected (4/35, 11%). Further, 6 of the 35 (17%) apps implemented 1 type of tailoring; of them, 4 (11%) used content matching and the other 2 (6%) used personalization. No app used 2 types of tailoring; only 2 (6%) used all 3 types (the third is feedback).

Conclusions: Existing dementia care apps do not provide sufficient high-quality, tailored information for informal caregivers. Caregivers should exercise caution when they use dementia care apps for informational support. Future research should focus on designing dementia care apps that incorporate quality-assured, transparency-enhanced, evidence-based artificial intelligence-enabled mHealth solutions for caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症护理人员的移动健康应用程序:对移动应用程序的系统检查。
背景:痴呆症患者的非正式护理人员越来越多地使用移动健康(mHealth)应用程序来获取护理信息。移动医疗应用程序被视为有前途的工具,可以更好地支持护理人员复杂和不断变化的信息需求。然而,人们对这些应用程序提供的痴呆症护理信息的类型和质量知之甚少。这些信息是为护理人员量身定制的吗?如果有,怎么做?目的:我们旨在通过系统地检查为痴呆症患者护理者提供的公开应用程序中提供的护理相关信息的类型和质量,以及用于根据护理者的信息需求和情况定制信息的应用程序功能,来解决上述文献中的空白。方法:我们于2023年9月采用多阶段流程为痴呆症患者护理人员选择移动应用程序。最后的样本包括35个应用程序。我们评估了(1)应用程序中提供的痴呆症护理信息类型,使用我们的3项阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症日常护理策略框架,包括教育信息、实际行动和转诊信息;(2)应用程序护理信息质量,采用美国国家医学图书馆推荐的11个指标;(3)提供个性化、反馈和内容匹配的定制类型,这是文献中描述的常见定制策略。结果:教育信息是最普遍的信息类型(29/35,83%),其次是实际行动信息(18/35,51%)和推荐信息(14/35,40%)。所有应用都清晰地呈现了它们的目标,并避免了不切实际或情绪化的要求。然而,很少有人提供信息来解释应用程序的内容是否由专家生成或审查(7/ 35,20%),或者其内容是如何被选择的(4/ 35,11%)。此外,35个应用程序中有6个(17%)实现了一种剪裁;其中4家(11%)使用内容匹配,另外2家(6%)使用个性化。没有应用程序使用2种类型的剪裁;只有2(6%)使用了所有3种类型(第三种是反馈)。结论:现有的痴呆症护理应用程序无法为非正式护理人员提供足够高质量的定制信息。护理人员在使用痴呆症护理应用程序寻求信息支持时应谨慎行事。未来的研究应该集中在设计痴呆症护理应用程序上,这些应用程序将质量保证、透明度增强、基于证据的人工智能支持的移动健康解决方案纳入护理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Best Practices for Implementing Electronic Care Records in Adult Social Care: Rapid Scoping Review. Exploring Older Adults' Perspectives and Acceptance of AI-Driven Health Technologies: Qualitative Study. Feasibility of a Cinematic-Virtual Reality Program Educating Health Professional Students About the Complexity of Geriatric Care: Pilot Pre-Post Study. Uncovering Specific Navigation Patterns by Assessing User Engagement of People With Dementia and Family Caregivers With an Advance Care Planning Website: Quantitative Analysis of Web Log Data. Assessment of Technology Readiness in Norwegian Older Adults With Long-Term Health Conditions Receiving Home Care Services: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1