[Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy after Systematic and MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy].

Toshifumi Takahashi, Masakazu Nakashima, Kouhei Maruno, Tatsuya Hazama, Yuya Yamada, Kazuro Kikkawa, Masahiro Tamaki, Noriyuki Ito
{"title":"[Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy after Systematic and MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy].","authors":"Toshifumi Takahashi, Masakazu Nakashima, Kouhei Maruno, Tatsuya Hazama, Yuya Yamada, Kazuro Kikkawa, Masahiro Tamaki, Noriyuki Ito","doi":"10.14989/ActaUrolJap_70_8_233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a riskof positive resection margins (RMs) in patients who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) following systematic prostate biopsies. This study examined the riskof positive RM post-RARP when magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasonography (MRI-US) fusion biopsy was performed along with systematic prostate biopsy. Sixty-one patients who had undergone MRI fusion biopsy and systematic transrectal and transperineal biopsies, followed by RARP, at our hospital between September 2020 and October 2023 were included. The median age was 61 years, and the median PSA level was 8.4 ng/ml. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups, the RM-positive group exhibited a significantly higher clinical stage. Of the 122 lobes of the prostate (including the right and left lobes), the RM-positive group (26 lobes) had a significantly higher proportion of positive transrectal biopsies of the internal and external glands of the 61 cases. Additionally, in the RM-positive group, the proportion of positive transperineal biopsies of the internal glands and the ratio of positive systematic biopsies were significantly higher. Logistic regression analysis of riskfactors linked to increased RM-positivity revealed that neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation and positive target biopsy were not significant variables. However, systematic biopsies positivity rate was a significant riskfactor. Thus, the riskof RMpositivity was shown to be associated with the systematic biopsy positivity rate, which suggested that systematic biopsies may be necessary for evaluating the indications for NVB preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39291,"journal":{"name":"Acta Urologica Japonica","volume":"70 8","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Urologica Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14989/ActaUrolJap_70_8_233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a riskof positive resection margins (RMs) in patients who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) following systematic prostate biopsies. This study examined the riskof positive RM post-RARP when magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasonography (MRI-US) fusion biopsy was performed along with systematic prostate biopsy. Sixty-one patients who had undergone MRI fusion biopsy and systematic transrectal and transperineal biopsies, followed by RARP, at our hospital between September 2020 and October 2023 were included. The median age was 61 years, and the median PSA level was 8.4 ng/ml. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups, the RM-positive group exhibited a significantly higher clinical stage. Of the 122 lobes of the prostate (including the right and left lobes), the RM-positive group (26 lobes) had a significantly higher proportion of positive transrectal biopsies of the internal and external glands of the 61 cases. Additionally, in the RM-positive group, the proportion of positive transperineal biopsies of the internal glands and the ratio of positive systematic biopsies were significantly higher. Logistic regression analysis of riskfactors linked to increased RM-positivity revealed that neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation and positive target biopsy were not significant variables. However, systematic biopsies positivity rate was a significant riskfactor. Thus, the riskof RMpositivity was shown to be associated with the systematic biopsy positivity rate, which suggested that systematic biopsies may be necessary for evaluating the indications for NVB preservation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术系统和mri超声融合引导前列腺活检后切缘阳性的危险因素]。
在系统前列腺活检后接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的患者存在切除边缘阳性的风险。本研究探讨了磁共振成像-超声(MRI-US)融合活检与系统前列腺活检同时进行rarp后RM阳性的风险。纳入了2020年9月至2023年10月在我院接受MRI融合活检和系统经直肠和经会阴活检,随后进行RARP检查的61例患者。中位年龄为61岁,中位PSA水平为8.4 ng/ml。两组间差异无统计学意义,但rm阳性组临床分期明显增高。在122个前列腺叶(包括左右叶)中,61例rm阳性组(26个叶)经直肠内外腺活检阳性比例明显高于阴性组。此外,在rm阳性组中,内部腺体经会阴活检阳性比例和系统活检阳性比例明显更高。Logistic回归分析与rm阳性增加相关的危险因素显示,神经血管束(NVB)保存和阳性靶活检不是显著变量。然而,系统活检阳性率是重要的危险因素。因此,rmb阳性的风险被证明与系统活检阳性率相关,这表明系统活检可能是评估NVB保存适应症的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Urologica Japonica
Acta Urologica Japonica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊最新文献
[The Case of Solitary Adrenal Metastasis of Urothelial Carcinoma]. [The Introduction of Pubic Hair into the Bladder : A Possibility of an Alternate Mechanism]. [A Case of Metastatic Testicular Cancer after Kidney Transplantation in which Complete Remission was Achieved]. [A Case of Pelvic Arteriovenous Malformation in a Male with Massive Bladder Bleeding which Caused Severe Hemorrhagic Hypovolemic Shock]. [Risk Factor of Cutaneous Symptoms Associated with Enfortumab Vedotin for Urothelial Carcinoma].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1