Assessing Professional Behaviors of Physician Assistant Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Scoping Review.

Erika R Francis, Kimberly Sapre
{"title":"Assessing Professional Behaviors of Physician Assistant Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Erika R Francis, Kimberly Sapre","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Professionalism in physician assistant (PA) students is an essential behavior to assess during formative medical education. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) provide an opportunity to evaluate PA students performing professional behaviors within simulated clinical settings. This scoping review aims to explore insights the existing literature offers regarding evaluating the professional behaviors of PA students using an OSCE. A secondary objective is to identify gaps in the literature to clarify future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted in March 2024. From January 2018 until March 2024, CINAHL, MEDLINE Ultimate, Health Source-Nursing/Education, and PubMed online databases were searched for publications in English. Records included research studying PA or medical students evaluated on professional behaviors using an OSCE or performance-based assessment instrument. Allied health profession students were excluded from the primary search because of their heterogeneous curriculum models outside the population of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review includes 5 papers. All papers reported communication as a professional behavior measured in an OSCE or performance-based assessment. A consensus or formal definition of professional behavior is a notable absence in this scoping review.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>More definitive homogenous evidence is needed to assess the professional behaviors of PA students using an OSCE. This limits the guidance and educational standards for future health profession educators. Comprehensive research into professional behaviors among PA students is essential. Scholars must publish their findings on professionalism curriculum design and outcomes to facilitate a broader understanding and improvement in educating future PA professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism in physician assistant (PA) students is an essential behavior to assess during formative medical education. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) provide an opportunity to evaluate PA students performing professional behaviors within simulated clinical settings. This scoping review aims to explore insights the existing literature offers regarding evaluating the professional behaviors of PA students using an OSCE. A secondary objective is to identify gaps in the literature to clarify future research.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted in March 2024. From January 2018 until March 2024, CINAHL, MEDLINE Ultimate, Health Source-Nursing/Education, and PubMed online databases were searched for publications in English. Records included research studying PA or medical students evaluated on professional behaviors using an OSCE or performance-based assessment instrument. Allied health profession students were excluded from the primary search because of their heterogeneous curriculum models outside the population of interest.

Results: This review includes 5 papers. All papers reported communication as a professional behavior measured in an OSCE or performance-based assessment. A consensus or formal definition of professional behavior is a notable absence in this scoping review.

Discussion: More definitive homogenous evidence is needed to assess the professional behaviors of PA students using an OSCE. This limits the guidance and educational standards for future health profession educators. Comprehensive research into professional behaviors among PA students is essential. Scholars must publish their findings on professionalism curriculum design and outcomes to facilitate a broader understanding and improvement in educating future PA professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医师助理学生在客观结构化临床检查中的专业行为:一项范围综述。
医师助理(PA)学生的专业素养是形成性医学教育中一项重要的行为评估。客观结构化临床考试(osce)提供了一个机会来评估PA学生在模拟临床环境中的专业行为。本综述旨在探讨现有文献提供的关于使用欧安组织评估PA学生职业行为的见解。第二个目标是找出文献中的空白,以澄清未来的研究。方法:本综述于2024年3月进行。从2018年1月到2024年3月,检索了CINAHL、MEDLINE Ultimate、Health Source-Nursing/Education和PubMed在线数据库的英文出版物。记录包括使用欧安组织或基于绩效的评估工具评估PA或医学生的专业行为的研究。联合医疗专业的学生被排除在初级搜索之外,因为他们的课程模式在感兴趣的人群之外。结果:本综述共收录5篇论文。所有论文都将沟通作为一种职业行为,在欧安组织或基于绩效的评估中加以衡量。值得注意的是,在这个范围审查中,专业行为的共识或正式定义是缺失的。讨论:需要更明确的同质证据来使用OSCE评估PA学生的专业行为。这限制了未来卫生职业教育者的指导和教育标准。对PA学生的职业行为进行全面的研究是必要的。学者们必须发表他们关于专业课程设计和成果的研究结果,以促进对未来专业人士教育的更广泛理解和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
International Physician Assistant Exchange: Facilitating Kinship in Education and Patient Care. Bridging the Gap: Implementing an Adjunct Faculty as a Remediation Specialist in a Physician Assistant/Associate Program. Fragments of Community: Physician Assistant Student Perspectives on Experience of Community With Faculty. Introducing Medical Educators to Interpersonal Theory: Its Application to Emotional Intelligence. Reimagining Physician Assistant Education: Championing Cognitive Diversity to Promote Inclusivity, Neurodiversity Awareness, and a Sense of Belonging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1