Can bile excretion on Gd-EOB-MRI be used as a visual criterion for the hepatobiliary phase?

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s12194-024-00868-w
Masafumi Nakamura, Yasuo Takatsu, Mutsumi Yoshizawa, Satoshi Kobayashi, Tosiaki Miyati
{"title":"Can bile excretion on Gd-EOB-MRI be used as a visual criterion for the hepatobiliary phase?","authors":"Masafumi Nakamura, Yasuo Takatsu, Mutsumi Yoshizawa, Satoshi Kobayashi, Tosiaki Miyati","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00868-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine whether visually observed biliary excretion of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) can be used to assess contrast adequacy of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Images of 121 patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used. Adequate HBP images were defined as a quantitative liver-spleen contrast ratio (Q-LSC) ≥ 1.5. Visual evaluation was performed to determine if an adequate HBP image could be obtained based on the presence or absence of bile excretion. Common bile duct-paravertebral contrast (CPC) was used to assess the degree of bile excretion, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was used to assess liver reserve, and the Q-LSC was used to assess HBP image contrast. The results were used to quantitatively evaluate the relationships of the degree of bile excretion with HBP image contrast and liver reserve. The cases correctly determined by visual evaluation via bile excretion were 80 (66.1%) at HBP 10 min after injection and 89 (73.6%) at HBP 20 min after injection. Among cases with Q-LSC ≥ 1.5 indicating bile excretion, there were 33 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 86 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Furthermore, among cases with Q-LSC < 1.5, indicating no bile excretion, there were 47 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 3 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Visually observed biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DTPA is not a criterion for adequate HBP image contrast.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00868-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine whether visually observed biliary excretion of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) can be used to assess contrast adequacy of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Images of 121 patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used. Adequate HBP images were defined as a quantitative liver-spleen contrast ratio (Q-LSC) ≥ 1.5. Visual evaluation was performed to determine if an adequate HBP image could be obtained based on the presence or absence of bile excretion. Common bile duct-paravertebral contrast (CPC) was used to assess the degree of bile excretion, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was used to assess liver reserve, and the Q-LSC was used to assess HBP image contrast. The results were used to quantitatively evaluate the relationships of the degree of bile excretion with HBP image contrast and liver reserve. The cases correctly determined by visual evaluation via bile excretion were 80 (66.1%) at HBP 10 min after injection and 89 (73.6%) at HBP 20 min after injection. Among cases with Q-LSC ≥ 1.5 indicating bile excretion, there were 33 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 86 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Furthermore, among cases with Q-LSC < 1.5, indicating no bile excretion, there were 47 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 3 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Visually observed biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DTPA is not a criterion for adequate HBP image contrast.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gd-EOB-MRI上的胆汁排泄是否可以作为肝胆期的视觉标准?
目的:确定目视观察胆汁中钆-乙氧基苄基-二乙烯三胺五乙酸(Gd-EOB-DTPA)的排泄是否可以用于评估肝胆期(HBP)图像的对比充分性。121例患者行gd - eob - dtpa增强磁共振成像。足够的HBP图像定义为定量肝脾对比比(Q-LSC)≥1.5。进行目视评估,以确定是否可以根据胆汁排泄的存在或不存在获得足够的HBP图像。采用总胆管-椎旁对比(CPC)评价胆汁排泄程度,白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)分级评价肝脏储备,Q-LSC评价HBP图像对比度。结果用于定量评价胆汁排泄程度与HBP图像对比度和肝脏储备的关系。经胆汁排泄目视评价正确的病例有80例(66.1%),分别为注射后10分钟HBP和20分钟HBP。在Q-LSC≥1.5提示有胆汁排泄的病例中,注射后10分钟HBP有33例,注射后20分钟HBP有86例。此外,在Q-LSC病例中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
Peripheral dose assessment in radiation therapy using photon beams: experimental results with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter. Influence of obtaining medical records and laboratory data on the sensitivity of diagnostic imaging assessment by radiological technologists. Dosimetric impact of arc simulation angular resolution in single-isocentre multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiomics and dosiomics approaches to estimate lung function after stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with lung tumors. Development of an image quality evaluation system for bedside chest X-ray images using scatter correction processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1