Zur Diskussion / Up for Discussion. Schützt Cannabis-Strafverfolgung die Gesundheit junger Menschen? Zur Umsetzung des Cannabisgesetzes / Does Cannabis Prosecution Protect Young People's Health? On the Implementation of the Cannabis Act.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.13109/prkk.2024.73.7.665
Nadja Gaßmann
{"title":"Zur Diskussion / Up for Discussion. Schützt Cannabis-Strafverfolgung die Gesundheit junger Menschen? Zur Umsetzung des Cannabisgesetzes / Does Cannabis Prosecution Protect Young People's Health? On the Implementation of the Cannabis Act.","authors":"Nadja Gaßmann","doi":"10.13109/prkk.2024.73.7.665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Does Cannabis Prosecution Protect Young People's Health? On the Implementation of the Cannabis Act Different drug policy alternatives involve their respective opportunities and risks. When weighing up the options, a large number of stakeholders concluded that criminal prosecution of cannabis protects the bio-psycho-social health of young people less than decriminalisation. They demanded and welcome the new regulation of cannabis, also in terms of the protection of minors. The extent to which the legal status of cannabis influences the consumption patterns of the young population isn't assessed uniformly by studies in different countries. Against this background, a 'numbers competition' is less helpful than looking at other, validly proven parameters for mental illnesses including substance disorders, e.g. poverty and education. The article argues in favour of making the Cannabis Act helpful for young people through cooperation between the various stakeholders. Two examples of this are highlighted: early intervention in accordance with Section 7 KCanG and the topic of 'motivation-, counselling- and treatment-chains'. The latter takes the demands of the Transition Psychiatry Task Force (2021) further as a proposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":45178,"journal":{"name":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","volume":"73 7","pages":"665-673"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2024.73.7.665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does Cannabis Prosecution Protect Young People's Health? On the Implementation of the Cannabis Act Different drug policy alternatives involve their respective opportunities and risks. When weighing up the options, a large number of stakeholders concluded that criminal prosecution of cannabis protects the bio-psycho-social health of young people less than decriminalisation. They demanded and welcome the new regulation of cannabis, also in terms of the protection of minors. The extent to which the legal status of cannabis influences the consumption patterns of the young population isn't assessed uniformly by studies in different countries. Against this background, a 'numbers competition' is less helpful than looking at other, validly proven parameters for mental illnesses including substance disorders, e.g. poverty and education. The article argues in favour of making the Cannabis Act helpful for young people through cooperation between the various stakeholders. Two examples of this are highlighted: early intervention in accordance with Section 7 KCanG and the topic of 'motivation-, counselling- and treatment-chains'. The latter takes the demands of the Transition Psychiatry Task Force (2021) further as a proposal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讨论/讨论。大麻执法能保护年轻人的健康吗?大麻起诉能保护年轻人的健康吗?关于大麻法案的实施。
大麻检控能保护青少年健康吗?不同的药物政策选择涉及各自的机会和风险。在权衡各种选择时,许多利益攸关方得出的结论是,对大麻进行刑事起诉比将大麻合法化更能保护年轻人的生物、心理和社会健康。他们要求并欢迎对大麻实行新的管制,包括在保护未成年人方面。不同国家的研究没有统一评估大麻的合法地位对年轻人口消费模式的影响程度。在这种背景下,“数字竞赛”不如着眼于其他有效证明的精神疾病参数,包括物质障碍,例如贫困和教育。这篇文章主张通过各利益相关者之间的合作,使大麻法案对年轻人有帮助。这方面有两个突出的例子:根据kang第7节的早期干预和“动机、咨询和治疗链”的主题。后者将过渡精神病学特别工作组(2021)的要求进一步作为提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Beiträge aus Praxis und Forschung, die sich mit Störungen der Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen sowie deren psychotherapeutischer Behandlung beschäftigen.
期刊最新文献
Editorial. Gutachterinnen und Gutachter / Reviewers. Inhalt. Autorinnen und Autoren / Authors. Editorial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1