Clinical diagnostic reference levels and image quality metrics for CT in oncology patients.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2960
Ida-Keshia Sebelego, Sussan Acho, William I D Rae
{"title":"Clinical diagnostic reference levels and image quality metrics for CT in oncology patients.","authors":"Ida-Keshia Sebelego, Sussan Acho, William I D Rae","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In CT, the volumetric CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>), dose-length product (DLP) and patient's size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) are used as diagnostic reference level (DRL) metrics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop clinical local DRL values for CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) examinations using the CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, DLP and SSDE, and to determine the image quality achieved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, 201 cancer patients were included in the study. The scanning parameters, dose metrics from the CT unit and participants' body mass index (BMI) were documented. The local CT DRL values for CAP examinations were defined as the median and 75th percentiles of the dose distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local DRL values given in terms of median CTDI<sub>vol</sub> ranged between 8.4 mGy and 12.7 mGy for the different types of cancers. The median DLPs ranged from 848 to 1173.4 mGy.cm for the various cancers. Generally, the radiation dose was directly proportional to the BMI and number of scan phases. Significant differences were observed between the DRLs for the various size-related parameters, number of scan phases and BMI classifications. The image quality was clinically satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No baseline data for clinical DRL values were available for this medical oncology department. The achieved DRLs were similar to published size-specific DRLs. The image quality was maintained during CT imaging. Dose optimisation and image quality assessment should be implemented to ensure optimal scanning parameters for different cancers in CT CAP examinations.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The first size-specific local DRL values for CT CAP investigations carried out on oncology patients in South Africa have been established.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"2960"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In CT, the volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and patient's size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) are used as diagnostic reference level (DRL) metrics.

Objectives: To develop clinical local DRL values for CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) examinations using the CTDIvol, DLP and SSDE, and to determine the image quality achieved.

Method: In total, 201 cancer patients were included in the study. The scanning parameters, dose metrics from the CT unit and participants' body mass index (BMI) were documented. The local CT DRL values for CAP examinations were defined as the median and 75th percentiles of the dose distribution.

Results: The local DRL values given in terms of median CTDIvol ranged between 8.4 mGy and 12.7 mGy for the different types of cancers. The median DLPs ranged from 848 to 1173.4 mGy.cm for the various cancers. Generally, the radiation dose was directly proportional to the BMI and number of scan phases. Significant differences were observed between the DRLs for the various size-related parameters, number of scan phases and BMI classifications. The image quality was clinically satisfactory.

Conclusion: No baseline data for clinical DRL values were available for this medical oncology department. The achieved DRLs were similar to published size-specific DRLs. The image quality was maintained during CT imaging. Dose optimisation and image quality assessment should be implemented to ensure optimal scanning parameters for different cancers in CT CAP examinations.

Contribution: The first size-specific local DRL values for CT CAP investigations carried out on oncology patients in South Africa have been established.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
期刊最新文献
Thinking outside tuberculosis: A case of widespread active disseminated cysticercosis. Sustainable radiology in South Africa. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT with electron-density reconstruction for lumbar disc herniation. The radiological features of HPV-positive vs HPV-negative OPSCC at a South African hospital. Clinical diagnostic reference levels and image quality metrics for CT in oncology patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1