Toward harmonization of aging and technology research: German adaptation of the mobile device proficiency questionnaire (MDPQ) for older adults.

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY European Journal of Ageing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s10433-024-00834-w
Anna Schlomann, Hans-Werner Wahl, Laura I Schmidt, Nicole Memmer, Christian Rietz, Neil Charness, Walter R Boot
{"title":"Toward harmonization of aging and technology research: German adaptation of the mobile device proficiency questionnaire (MDPQ) for older adults.","authors":"Anna Schlomann, Hans-Werner Wahl, Laura I Schmidt, Nicole Memmer, Christian Rietz, Neil Charness, Walter R Boot","doi":"10.1007/s10433-024-00834-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ) is a well-established, reliable, and valid instrument to measure basic and advanced mobile device skills among older adults. We offer a German adaptation of the MDPQ and report reliability and validity findings. A controlled translation procedure was applied. The translated scale was tested in two analytical samples with an age range of 50-95 years in 2020 (n = 548) and 2022 (n = 276). To assess reliabilities, internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities are reported. To assess validity, we analyze the scale in the context of gender, age, and educational differences and its associations with measures of technology use and attitudes towards technology (convergent and divergent validity). The German adaptation of the MDPQ was found to be reliable and valid as the original version. The scale demonstrated an excellent internal consistency in both studies with α = 0.95 (study 2: α = 0.92) and ω = 0.95 (study 2: ω = 0.93). Subscale internal consistencies were all ≥ 0.65. Test-retest reliabilities with measurement waves 2 years apart showed excellent values (MDPQ full scale: r<sub>tt</sub> = 0.84, p < 0.001). We also found the expected factorial structure of the scale, positive associations with education, mobile device use and technology attitudes, and negative associations with age. Women scored lower than men. The German adaptation of the MDPQ can serve as a useful tool to estimate mobile device skills in older adults in German speaking countries in a reliable and valid way, for example in survey research, research projects, and practice contexts. Translating and implementing the MDPQ in other European countries will help to further strengthen internationally harmonized assessments in technology and aging research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":"21 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-024-00834-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ) is a well-established, reliable, and valid instrument to measure basic and advanced mobile device skills among older adults. We offer a German adaptation of the MDPQ and report reliability and validity findings. A controlled translation procedure was applied. The translated scale was tested in two analytical samples with an age range of 50-95 years in 2020 (n = 548) and 2022 (n = 276). To assess reliabilities, internal consistencies and test-retest reliabilities are reported. To assess validity, we analyze the scale in the context of gender, age, and educational differences and its associations with measures of technology use and attitudes towards technology (convergent and divergent validity). The German adaptation of the MDPQ was found to be reliable and valid as the original version. The scale demonstrated an excellent internal consistency in both studies with α = 0.95 (study 2: α = 0.92) and ω = 0.95 (study 2: ω = 0.93). Subscale internal consistencies were all ≥ 0.65. Test-retest reliabilities with measurement waves 2 years apart showed excellent values (MDPQ full scale: rtt = 0.84, p < 0.001). We also found the expected factorial structure of the scale, positive associations with education, mobile device use and technology attitudes, and negative associations with age. Women scored lower than men. The German adaptation of the MDPQ can serve as a useful tool to estimate mobile device skills in older adults in German speaking countries in a reliable and valid way, for example in survey research, research projects, and practice contexts. Translating and implementing the MDPQ in other European countries will help to further strengthen internationally harmonized assessments in technology and aging research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向老龄化和技术研究的协调:德国针对老年人的移动设备熟练程度调查问卷(MDPQ)。
移动设备熟练程度问卷(MDPQ)是一种完善、可靠和有效的工具,用于测量老年人的基本和高级移动设备技能。我们提供了德国MDPQ的改编版,并报告了信度和效度结果。采用了受控的翻译程序。在2020年(n = 548)和2022年(n = 276)两个年龄范围为50-95岁的分析样本中测试了翻译后的量表。为了评估信度,报告了内部一致性和重测信度。为了评估效度,我们在性别、年龄和教育差异的背景下分析了量表,并分析了量表与技术使用和技术态度的关系(趋同效度和发散效度)。德国对MDPQ的改编被发现与原始版本一样可靠和有效。该量表在两项研究中均表现出良好的内部一致性,α = 0.95(研究2:α = 0.92), ω = 0.95(研究2:ω = 0.93)。子量表内部一致性均≥0.65。测量波间隔2年的重测信度表现出优异的值(MDPQ满量表:rtt = 0.84, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
THE ARCHITECT AS ARTIST
IF 0.8 1区 艺术学BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICSPub Date : 1967-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/BJAESTHETICS/7.2.175
W. Gauldie
Arata Isozaki: the architect as artist
IF 0.1 4区 艺术学arq-Architectural Research QuarterlyPub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1359135520000329
Hyunjung Cho
The Painterly Poe: Architect, Artist, Author
IF 0 Edgar Allan Poe ReviewPub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.5325/edgallpoerev.24.2.0198
Nina Elisabeth Cook
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
期刊最新文献
Older adults know when they have been left out but they respond rationally. The potential of depressive symptoms to identify cognitive impairment in ageing. Trajectories of long-term care entitlements in severely disabled older adults using nationwide Dutch data. How are location and type of caring associated with the carer's mental health? Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from SHARE. Childhood adversities and home atmosphere as determinants of resilience in old age: findings from the Helsinki birth cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1