Tabletop Simulations in Medical Emergencies: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000838
Amélie Frégeau, Billy Vinette, Alexandra Lapierre, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Guillaume Fontaine, Véronique Castonguay, Rodrigo Flores-Soto, Zoé Garceau-Tremblay, Samuel Blais, Laura-Philippe Vigneault, Delphine Hansen-Jaumard, François Laramée, Massimiliano Iseppon, Raoul Daoust, Sylvie Cossette, Michael Buyck, Richard Fleet, Alexis Cournoyer
{"title":"Tabletop Simulations in Medical Emergencies: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Amélie Frégeau, Billy Vinette, Alexandra Lapierre, Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Guillaume Fontaine, Véronique Castonguay, Rodrigo Flores-Soto, Zoé Garceau-Tremblay, Samuel Blais, Laura-Philippe Vigneault, Delphine Hansen-Jaumard, François Laramée, Massimiliano Iseppon, Raoul Daoust, Sylvie Cossette, Michael Buyck, Richard Fleet, Alexis Cournoyer","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary statement: </strong>Tabletop simulations (TTS) are a novel educational modality used in health care education. The objective of this scoping review was to describe the use of TTS in medical emergencies, specifically settings, specialties, participants, formats, and outcomes.We included 70 studies (33 descriptive studies [47%], 33 cohort studies [47%], and 2 randomized controlled trials [3%]), of which 65 reported positive results regarding reaction and learning educational outcomes (reaction: n = 37, 53%; learning: n = 25, 36%; behavior: n = 7, 10%; result: n = 1, 1%). The scenario for most TTS was a disaster (n = 56; 80%). Most TTS involved participants from several professions (n = 45; 64%). A board game was used in 26 studies (37%).Most studies on TTS in medical emergencies involved participants from multiple professions addressing disaster scenarios and showed positive results pertaining to reaction or learning educational outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"i"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary statement: Tabletop simulations (TTS) are a novel educational modality used in health care education. The objective of this scoping review was to describe the use of TTS in medical emergencies, specifically settings, specialties, participants, formats, and outcomes.We included 70 studies (33 descriptive studies [47%], 33 cohort studies [47%], and 2 randomized controlled trials [3%]), of which 65 reported positive results regarding reaction and learning educational outcomes (reaction: n = 37, 53%; learning: n = 25, 36%; behavior: n = 7, 10%; result: n = 1, 1%). The scenario for most TTS was a disaster (n = 56; 80%). Most TTS involved participants from several professions (n = 45; 64%). A board game was used in 26 studies (37%).Most studies on TTS in medical emergencies involved participants from multiple professions addressing disaster scenarios and showed positive results pertaining to reaction or learning educational outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桌面模拟在医疗紧急情况:范围审查。
摘要:桌面模拟(TTS)是一种用于卫生保健教育的新型教育模式。本综述的目的是描述TTS在医疗紧急情况中的使用,特别是环境、专业、参与者、形式和结果。我们纳入了70项研究(33项描述性研究[47%],33项队列研究[47%],2项随机对照试验[3%]),其中65项研究报告了反应和学习教育结果的阳性结果(反应:n = 37, 53%;学习:n = 25, 36%;行为:n = 7, 10%;结果:n = 1,1%)。大多数TTS的情况是灾难(n = 56;80%)。大多数TTS参与者来自不同行业(n = 45;64%)。26项研究(37%)使用了棋盘游戏。大多数关于医疗紧急情况中的TTS的研究涉及来自处理灾难情景的多个专业的参与者,并显示出与反应或学习教育成果有关的积极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Building Global Partnerships: A Qualitative Exploration of In-Person Training for HealthCare Simulation Educators Working in Low-Resource Settings. Using Mobile and Remote Simulation as a Research Methodology for Health Care Delivery Research. A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Intrinsic Factors and Psychological Safety Among Nursing Students During Simulation-Based Learning-A Correlational Design. Discriminative Ability of Dye Injected Into a Meat Model to Determine Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1