Identifying critical elements in using question prompt lists at the pharmacy counter to induce patient activation—using principles of conversation analysis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.008
Karin Svensberg , Susanne Kaae , Nanna Broch Mottelson , Christina Ljungberg Persson
{"title":"Identifying critical elements in using question prompt lists at the pharmacy counter to induce patient activation—using principles of conversation analysis","authors":"Karin Svensberg ,&nbsp;Susanne Kaae ,&nbsp;Nanna Broch Mottelson ,&nbsp;Christina Ljungberg Persson","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The incorporation of Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) into pharmacy interactions has been tested as an innovative strategy aimed at enhancing patient engagement and addressing personal information needs. However, there is a gap in understanding regarding how QPLs induce or reduce patient activation and contribute to improved medical treatment. The specific aim of the study was therefore to qualitatively describe how pharmacy encounters in which QPL are introduced unfold, in order to identify and discuss relevant interactional mechanisms that induce or reduce patient activation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The QPL, which includes questions about usage, interaction, side effects, and follow-up, was introduced to patients during pharmacy encounters. Employing a qualitative inductive approach based on principles from conversation analysis (CA), audio-recordings from 56 QPL encounters in community pharmacies were transcribed and thematically analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most meetings began with a long initiation phase focused on determining which medications to take home. This was followed by an introduction to the QPL and a natural break where the pharmacist left to get the medicines, giving the patient an opportunity to contemplate their needs, as prompted by the QPL. While the QPL itself was not explicitly explained or discussed, the majority of patients asked questions and shared personal information. Even those who were disinterested felt compelled to justify their stance, demonstrating the influence of the norm of reciprocity. However, instances of unsolicited information provision by the pharmacist, were still identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that QPLs can enhance patient activation in pharmacy encounters, even without detailed explanations, but their impact is not straightforward. The presence of the QPL encouraged patients to engage, share personal information, and ask questions. These findings suggest that QPLs can create opportunities for patient involvement, even in brief pharmacy interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124003632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The incorporation of Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) into pharmacy interactions has been tested as an innovative strategy aimed at enhancing patient engagement and addressing personal information needs. However, there is a gap in understanding regarding how QPLs induce or reduce patient activation and contribute to improved medical treatment. The specific aim of the study was therefore to qualitatively describe how pharmacy encounters in which QPL are introduced unfold, in order to identify and discuss relevant interactional mechanisms that induce or reduce patient activation.

Methods

The QPL, which includes questions about usage, interaction, side effects, and follow-up, was introduced to patients during pharmacy encounters. Employing a qualitative inductive approach based on principles from conversation analysis (CA), audio-recordings from 56 QPL encounters in community pharmacies were transcribed and thematically analysed.

Results

Most meetings began with a long initiation phase focused on determining which medications to take home. This was followed by an introduction to the QPL and a natural break where the pharmacist left to get the medicines, giving the patient an opportunity to contemplate their needs, as prompted by the QPL. While the QPL itself was not explicitly explained or discussed, the majority of patients asked questions and shared personal information. Even those who were disinterested felt compelled to justify their stance, demonstrating the influence of the norm of reciprocity. However, instances of unsolicited information provision by the pharmacist, were still identified.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that QPLs can enhance patient activation in pharmacy encounters, even without detailed explanations, but their impact is not straightforward. The presence of the QPL encouraged patients to engage, share personal information, and ask questions. These findings suggest that QPLs can create opportunities for patient involvement, even in brief pharmacy interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定在药房柜台使用问题提示列表来诱导患者激活的关键因素-使用对话分析原则。
背景:将问题提示列表(QPLs)整合到药房互动中,作为一种旨在提高患者参与度和解决个人信息需求的创新策略,已经进行了测试。然而,关于QPLs如何诱导或减少患者激活并有助于改善医疗的理解存在差距。因此,该研究的具体目的是定性地描述引入QPL的药房遭遇如何展开,以确定和讨论诱导或减少患者激活的相关相互作用机制。方法:在药房就诊时向患者介绍QPL,其中包括使用、相互作用、副作用和随访等问题。采用基于对话分析(CA)原则的定性归纳方法,对社区药房56次QPL遭遇的录音进行转录并进行主题分析。结果:大多数会议开始于长时间的初始阶段,重点是确定带哪些药物回家。随后是对QPL的介绍,药剂师离开去取药的自然休息,给病人一个机会考虑他们的需求,正如QPL所提示的那样。虽然QPL本身没有明确解释或讨论,但大多数患者提出了问题并分享了个人信息。即使是那些不感兴趣的人也不得不为自己的立场辩护,这表明了互惠原则的影响。然而,药剂师主动提供信息的情况仍然被发现。结论:本研究表明,即使没有详细的解释,QPLs也可以增强患者在药房相遇时的激活,但它们的影响并非直截了当。QPL的存在鼓励患者参与,分享个人信息,并提出问题。这些发现表明,QPLs可以为患者参与创造机会,即使是在短暂的药物相互作用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents A deep neural network model for classifying pharmacy practice publications into research domains Why are pharmacy technicians leaving? Factors contributing to turnover intention and strategies for retention The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications The association between falls and fall-risk-increasing drugs among older patients in out-patient clinics: A retrospective cohort, single center study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1