YouTube as a Source of Knowledge for Childhood Glaucoma.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3928/01913913-20241105-04
Mohamed M Khodeiry, Qais A Dihan, Taher K Eleiwa, Amr K Hassan, Mohamed A Hassan, Tom Kornhauser, Mohamed S Sayed, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
{"title":"YouTube as a Source of Knowledge for Childhood Glaucoma.","authors":"Mohamed M Khodeiry, Qais A Dihan, Taher K Eleiwa, Amr K Hassan, Mohamed A Hassan, Tom Kornhauser, Mohamed S Sayed, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20241105-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality and reliability of patient-targeted videos about childhood glaucoma on the YouTube platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On March 1, 2024, a search was performed on YouTube (www.youtube.com) using the keywords \"Infantile glaucoma,\" \"childhood glaucoma,\" \"paediatric glaucoma,\" \"congenital glaucoma,\" \"juvenile glaucoma,\" \"buphthalmos,\" and \"pediatric glaucoma.\" For each video, the time since the upload date (days), duration of the videos (minutes), number of likes, dislikes, and comments, the view ratio (number of views/time since the upload date), like ratio (likes × 100) / (likes+dislikes), view power index ([like ratio × view ratio] / 100), and upload source (whether it was uploaded by medical organization versus uploaded by patients or commercial organization) were recorded. Two independent reviewers blindly evaluated the patient-targeted videos using DISCERN, the <i>Journal of American Medical Association</i> (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five videos were analyzed, and 19 (64%) of them were uploaded by physicians or medical organizations. The overall median (interquartile range) scores for DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS criteria were 2.5 (1.8 to 3.0), 2.5 (2.0 to 2.5), and 3.5 (2.5 to 4.0), respectively. No significant differences in scoring were noted between the two reviewers. The duration of the videos was significantly correlated with the GQS; however, no other video parameters were correlated to the quality scorings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos of patient education about childhood glaucoma were of moderate quality and reliability. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20241105-04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality and reliability of patient-targeted videos about childhood glaucoma on the YouTube platform.

Methods: On March 1, 2024, a search was performed on YouTube (www.youtube.com) using the keywords "Infantile glaucoma," "childhood glaucoma," "paediatric glaucoma," "congenital glaucoma," "juvenile glaucoma," "buphthalmos," and "pediatric glaucoma." For each video, the time since the upload date (days), duration of the videos (minutes), number of likes, dislikes, and comments, the view ratio (number of views/time since the upload date), like ratio (likes × 100) / (likes+dislikes), view power index ([like ratio × view ratio] / 100), and upload source (whether it was uploaded by medical organization versus uploaded by patients or commercial organization) were recorded. Two independent reviewers blindly evaluated the patient-targeted videos using DISCERN, the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS) criteria.

Results: Twenty-five videos were analyzed, and 19 (64%) of them were uploaded by physicians or medical organizations. The overall median (interquartile range) scores for DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS criteria were 2.5 (1.8 to 3.0), 2.5 (2.0 to 2.5), and 3.5 (2.5 to 4.0), respectively. No significant differences in scoring were noted between the two reviewers. The duration of the videos was significantly correlated with the GQS; however, no other video parameters were correlated to the quality scorings.

Conclusions: YouTube videos of patient education about childhood glaucoma were of moderate quality and reliability. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YouTube是儿童青光眼的知识来源。
目的:评价YouTube平台上针对儿童青光眼患者的视频的质量和可靠性。方法:在2024年3月1日,在YouTube (www.youtube.com)上搜索关键词“婴儿青光眼”、“儿童青光眼”、“儿科青光眼”、“先天性青光眼”、“青少年青光眼”、“buphthalmos”和“儿科青光眼”。对于每个视频,记录自上传日期至今的时间(天)、视频时长(分钟)、喜欢、不喜欢、评论数、观看比(自上传日期至今的观看数/时间)、点赞比(点赞× 100) /(点赞+不喜欢)、观看功率指数([点赞比×观看比]/ 100)、上传源(是由医疗机构上传还是由患者或商业机构上传)。两名独立审稿人使用DISCERN、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)和全球质量评分(GQS)标准对针对患者的视频进行盲目评估。结果:分析了25个视频,其中19个(64%)是由医生或医疗机构上传的。DISCERN、JAMA和GQS标准的总体中位数(四分位数范围)得分分别为2.5(1.8至3.0)、2.5(2.0至2.5)和3.5(2.5至4.0)。两名评论者在评分上没有显著差异。视频时长与GQS显著相关;然而,没有其他视频参数与质量评分相关。结论:YouTube儿童青光眼患者教育视频质量中等,可靠性较高。[J].儿童眼斜视,2009;X(X):XXX-XXX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
期刊最新文献
Changes in PAX7 Positive Satellite Cells in Extraocular Muscle After Strabismus Surgery. Long-term Motor and Sensory Outcomes After Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession-Medial Rectus Resection for Infantile Constant Exotropia. Ophthalmic Outcomes in Children With Spina Bifida Myelomeningocele in Ireland. Capturing Bilateral Retinoblastoma. Botulinum Toxin A Augmentation of Strabismus Surgery for Large-Angle Strabismus: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1