Child-physician rapport at a neurodevelopmental clinic: In the eyes of the beholder.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108586
Yael Karni-Visel, Shirie Gordon-Feliks, Menachem Lam, Michal Klein, Mitchell Schertz
{"title":"Child-physician rapport at a neurodevelopmental clinic: In the eyes of the beholder.","authors":"Yael Karni-Visel, Shirie Gordon-Feliks, Menachem Lam, Michal Klein, Mitchell Schertz","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Building rapport with young patients is crucial for fostering a sense of comfort that enhances their cooperation during clinical encounters and improves clinical outcomes. The available data on children with neurodevelopmental disabilities in community-based settings, including data on child-physician rapport, is limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine how children with neurodevelopmental disabilities perceive rapport with treating physicians compared to parents and treating physicians and to evaluate the relationship between the child-reported rapport and its impact on their cooperation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred two children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (M years = 9.63, SD = 2.42) completed the CHARM-C Questionnaire, which assessed their experience of rapport with their examining physicians following neurodevelopmental assessments. In parallel, their parents and physicians completed the CHARM-A Questionnaire, which assessed how they perceived the children's experience of rapport (a total of 306 questionnaires). The physicians also rated children's cooperation. The data were analyzed using correlation, regression, and mixed linear analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children's perceptions of rapport were significantly less positive than those of parents (d = -0.60) and physicians (d = -0.45). A moderate partial correlation (r = .37) was found between children's and parents' perceptions. Neither children's nor parents' perceptions were correlated with physicians' perceptions. Children's perceptions of rapport were positively associated with greater cooperation (β = .28).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Children with neurodevelopmental disabilities rated their rapport with physicians lower than parents and doctors. Their evaluations offer valuable insights, complementing caregivers' and professionals' perspectives. Training physicians to improve their assessments of children's needs during medical encounters is critically important.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"131 ","pages":"108586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Building rapport with young patients is crucial for fostering a sense of comfort that enhances their cooperation during clinical encounters and improves clinical outcomes. The available data on children with neurodevelopmental disabilities in community-based settings, including data on child-physician rapport, is limited.

Aims: To examine how children with neurodevelopmental disabilities perceive rapport with treating physicians compared to parents and treating physicians and to evaluate the relationship between the child-reported rapport and its impact on their cooperation.

Methods: One hundred two children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (M years = 9.63, SD = 2.42) completed the CHARM-C Questionnaire, which assessed their experience of rapport with their examining physicians following neurodevelopmental assessments. In parallel, their parents and physicians completed the CHARM-A Questionnaire, which assessed how they perceived the children's experience of rapport (a total of 306 questionnaires). The physicians also rated children's cooperation. The data were analyzed using correlation, regression, and mixed linear analyses.

Results: Children's perceptions of rapport were significantly less positive than those of parents (d = -0.60) and physicians (d = -0.45). A moderate partial correlation (r = .37) was found between children's and parents' perceptions. Neither children's nor parents' perceptions were correlated with physicians' perceptions. Children's perceptions of rapport were positively associated with greater cooperation (β = .28).

Discussion: Children with neurodevelopmental disabilities rated their rapport with physicians lower than parents and doctors. Their evaluations offer valuable insights, complementing caregivers' and professionals' perspectives. Training physicians to improve their assessments of children's needs during medical encounters is critically important.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经发育诊所的儿童-医生关系:在旁观者的眼中。
背景:与年轻患者建立融洽的关系对于培养一种舒适感至关重要,这种舒适感可以增强他们在临床接触中的合作,并改善临床结果。关于社区环境中神经发育障碍儿童的现有数据,包括关于儿童-医生关系的数据,是有限的。目的:研究神经发育障碍儿童与主治医生、父母和主治医生之间的融洽关系,并评估儿童报告的融洽关系及其对合作的影响。方法:120例神经发育障碍儿童(M岁= 9.63,SD = 2.42)填写CHARM-C问卷,评估其在接受神经发育评估后与检查医师的关系体验。与此同时,他们的父母和医生完成了问卷调查(共306份问卷),以评估他们如何看待孩子们的融洽体验。医生们还对孩子们的合作程度进行了评分。采用相关分析、回归分析和混合线性分析对数据进行分析。结果:儿童对融洽关系的感知明显低于父母(d = -0.60)和医生(d = -0.45)。在孩子和父母的认知之间发现中度偏相关(r = .37)。孩子和父母的看法与医生的看法都不相关。儿童对融洽关系的感知与更大的合作呈正相关(β = .28)。讨论:患有神经发育障碍的儿童认为他们与医生的关系比父母和医生的关系要低。他们的评估提供了有价值的见解,补充了护理人员和专业人士的观点。对医生进行培训,以提高他们在就医时对儿童需求的评估,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
A nurse-led approach to testing and adapting a telehealth guide for e-empathy in goals of care conversations for Black patients with chronic kidney disease. A scoping review of parents' disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic alteration test results to underage children. Child-physician rapport at a neurodevelopmental clinic: In the eyes of the beholder. Instruments evaluating the duration and pace of clinical encounters: A scoping review. The influencing factors in intention making-decision of Human papillomavirus vaccine in Chinese college students: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1