Programme-Led and Focused Interventions for Recent Onset Binge/Purge Eating Disorders: Use and Outcomes in the First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) Network.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS International Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1002/eat.24343
Karina L Allen, Laura Courtney, Philippa Croft, Lucy Hyam, Regan Mills, Katie Richards, Muhammad Ahmed, Ulrike Schmidt
{"title":"Programme-Led and Focused Interventions for Recent Onset Binge/Purge Eating Disorders: Use and Outcomes in the First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) Network.","authors":"Karina L Allen, Laura Courtney, Philippa Croft, Lucy Hyam, Regan Mills, Katie Richards, Muhammad Ahmed, Ulrike Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/eat.24343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare use of, and outcomes from, programme-led and focused interventions (guided self-help and 10 session cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders [CBT-T]) relative to other psychological therapies (including group and individual CBT for eating disorders [CBT-ED]) in a national sample of emerging adults receiving early intervention for a non-underweight binge/purge eating disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were drawn from 54 English eating disorder services using the First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) model. Participants (N = 1097) had a mean age of 18.95 years (SD 2.42) and diagnoses of bulimia nervosa (n = 506; 45%), binge eating disorder (n = 121; 11%), another specified feeding or eating disorder (n = 460; 42%), or an eating disorder, unspecified (n = 10, 1%). Linear mixed models were used to assess for effects of time and treatment on binge eating and purging, eating disorder psychopathology, depression/anxiety, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11% (n = 117) of patients received guided self-help and 24% (n = 268) received CBT-T. Baseline eating disorder psychopathology and depressive/anxiety symptoms did not differ significantly across the guided self-help, CBT-T, group CBT-ED, and individual CBT-ED conditions. All treatments were associated with significant reductions in symptoms over time. GSH and CBT-T performed comparably to longer CBT-ED.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We provide additional evidence for the effectiveness of GSH and CBT-T in the treatment of non-underweight binge/purge eating disorders. Programme-led and focused interventions may be under-utilized and future research should explore when they are offered, and when not, both within and outside of early intervention settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare use of, and outcomes from, programme-led and focused interventions (guided self-help and 10 session cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders [CBT-T]) relative to other psychological therapies (including group and individual CBT for eating disorders [CBT-ED]) in a national sample of emerging adults receiving early intervention for a non-underweight binge/purge eating disorder.

Method: Data were drawn from 54 English eating disorder services using the First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) model. Participants (N = 1097) had a mean age of 18.95 years (SD 2.42) and diagnoses of bulimia nervosa (n = 506; 45%), binge eating disorder (n = 121; 11%), another specified feeding or eating disorder (n = 460; 42%), or an eating disorder, unspecified (n = 10, 1%). Linear mixed models were used to assess for effects of time and treatment on binge eating and purging, eating disorder psychopathology, depression/anxiety, and body mass index.

Results: 11% (n = 117) of patients received guided self-help and 24% (n = 268) received CBT-T. Baseline eating disorder psychopathology and depressive/anxiety symptoms did not differ significantly across the guided self-help, CBT-T, group CBT-ED, and individual CBT-ED conditions. All treatments were associated with significant reductions in symptoms over time. GSH and CBT-T performed comparably to longer CBT-ED.

Discussion: We provide additional evidence for the effectiveness of GSH and CBT-T in the treatment of non-underweight binge/purge eating disorders. Programme-led and focused interventions may be under-utilized and future research should explore when they are offered, and when not, both within and outside of early intervention settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新近发作的暴食/泻性饮食失调的项目主导和重点干预:在饮食失调(FREED)网络的第一期快速早期干预中的使用和结果。
目的:我们的目的是比较项目主导和重点干预(指导自助和10期饮食失调认知行为治疗[CBT- t])与其他心理治疗(包括饮食失调群体和个人CBT [CBT- ed])在接受非体重过轻暴食/排泻性饮食失调早期干预的国家样本中的使用情况和结果。方法:数据来自54个英国饮食失调服务机构,使用第一集快速早期干预饮食失调(FREED)模型。参与者(N = 1097)平均年龄为18.95岁(SD 2.42),诊断为神经性贪食(N = 506;45%),暴食症(n = 121;11%),另一种特定的进食障碍(n = 460;42%),或饮食失调,未明确(n = 10.1%)。线性混合模型用于评估时间和治疗对暴食和排便、饮食失调精神病理、抑郁/焦虑和体重指数的影响。结果:11% (n = 117)的患者接受了引导自助,24% (n = 268)的患者接受了CBT-T。基线饮食失调精神病理和抑郁/焦虑症状在引导自助、CBT-T、组CBT-ED和个体CBT-ED条件下没有显著差异。随着时间的推移,所有的治疗方法都与症状的显著减轻有关。GSH和CBT-T的表现与较长的CBT-ED相当。讨论:我们为谷胱甘肽和CBT-T治疗非体重过轻的暴食/泻食障碍的有效性提供了额外的证据。以规划为主导和重点突出的干预措施可能未得到充分利用,今后的研究应探讨在早期干预环境内外何时提供和不提供这些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Symptoms in Adolescent Patients With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Empirically Determining Binge/Purge Frequency Thresholds for Differentiating Anorexia Nervosa-Restricting Subtype vs. Binge-Purge Subtype. A Qualitative Study of the Lived Treatment Experiences of Women With an Eating Disorder and Comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder. Correction to Economic Evaluation of Web-Based Guided Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Enhanced for Binge-Eating Disorder Compared to a Waiting-List: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Outcomes Among Adolescents Diagnosed With Anorexia Nervosa During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1