Drug-Eluting Stent versus Interwoven Bare-Metal Stent in Clinically Significant Vein-Graft Anastomotic Stenosis of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Graft.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1177/15266028241292468
Keerati Hongsakul, Supawut Khantayanuwong, Jitpreedee Sungsiri, Phurich Janjindamai, Surasit Akkakrisee, Kittipitch Bannangkoon, Sorracha Rookkapan, Ussanee Boonsrirat
{"title":"Drug-Eluting Stent versus Interwoven Bare-Metal Stent in Clinically Significant Vein-Graft Anastomotic Stenosis of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Graft.","authors":"Keerati Hongsakul, Supawut Khantayanuwong, Jitpreedee Sungsiri, Phurich Janjindamai, Surasit Akkakrisee, Kittipitch Bannangkoon, Sorracha Rookkapan, Ussanee Boonsrirat","doi":"10.1177/15266028241292468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To date, no direct comparison has been made between the patency rates of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and interwoven stents (IWSs) in addressing hemodialysis access dysfunction. This study aims to directly compare the primary patency rates of DES and IWS in clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between January 2015 and October 2022, we enrolled all hemodialysis patients with clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of AVGs who presented at our institution. Patient demographics, AVG details, lesion characteristics, and primary patency data for each stent group were systemically recorded. Following this, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the primary stent patency was performed, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 patients (19 men and 32 women; mean age=64 years; range=49-79 years) were enrolled. Among them, 16 were treated with DES and 35 were treated with IWS. Notably, the most common stent placement location in each group was the vein-graft anastomosis of the brachioaxillary grafts, and the primary patency rate was monitored over a follow-up period of 24 months. At 6, 12, and 24 months, the primary patency rates for DES vs IWS were 100% vs 62.7%, 91.7% vs 38.8%, and 62.9% vs 21.4%, respectively (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that DES may be a more effective treatment choice for clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in AVGs for hemodialysis access than nondrug-coated IWS.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been widely recognized for their efficacy in reducing reintervention rates in coronary and femoropopliteal pathologies. However, their application in managing failing hemodialysis access remains inadequately explored. This study highlights the promising potential of DES in addressing clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVG). DES may represent a viable alternative for mitigating substantial immediate recoil stenosis following balloon angioplasty and for preventing early restenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis of AVG, offering a novel therapeutic avenue for future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241292468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241292468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To date, no direct comparison has been made between the patency rates of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and interwoven stents (IWSs) in addressing hemodialysis access dysfunction. This study aims to directly compare the primary patency rates of DES and IWS in clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).

Material and methods: Between January 2015 and October 2022, we enrolled all hemodialysis patients with clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of AVGs who presented at our institution. Patient demographics, AVG details, lesion characteristics, and primary patency data for each stent group were systemically recorded. Following this, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the primary stent patency was performed, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Results: A total of 51 patients (19 men and 32 women; mean age=64 years; range=49-79 years) were enrolled. Among them, 16 were treated with DES and 35 were treated with IWS. Notably, the most common stent placement location in each group was the vein-graft anastomosis of the brachioaxillary grafts, and the primary patency rate was monitored over a follow-up period of 24 months. At 6, 12, and 24 months, the primary patency rates for DES vs IWS were 100% vs 62.7%, 91.7% vs 38.8%, and 62.9% vs 21.4%, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DES may be a more effective treatment choice for clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in AVGs for hemodialysis access than nondrug-coated IWS.

Clinical impact: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been widely recognized for their efficacy in reducing reintervention rates in coronary and femoropopliteal pathologies. However, their application in managing failing hemodialysis access remains inadequately explored. This study highlights the promising potential of DES in addressing clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVG). DES may represent a viable alternative for mitigating substantial immediate recoil stenosis following balloon angioplasty and for preventing early restenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis of AVG, offering a novel therapeutic avenue for future clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物洗脱支架与交织裸金属支架在血液透析动静脉移植物临床明显静脉吻合口狭窄中的比较。
目的:到目前为止,没有直接比较药物洗脱支架(DESs)和交织支架(IWSs)在解决血液透析通路障碍方面的通畅率。本研究旨在直接比较DES和IWS在临床上明显的动静脉移植物吻合口狭窄(AVGs)中的原发性通畅率。材料和方法:2015年1月至2022年10月期间,我们纳入了所有在我院就诊的具有临床意义的avg静脉移植吻合口狭窄的血液透析患者。系统记录每个支架组的患者人口统计学、AVG细节、病变特征和主要通畅数据。在此之后,对支架初次通畅进行Kaplan-Meier分析,结果具有统计学意义:共有51例患者(男性19例,女性32例;平均年龄64岁;范围=49-79岁)。其中DES治疗16例,IWS治疗35例。值得注意的是,各组最常见的支架放置位置是臂腋窝移植物的静脉-移植物吻合,并在24个月的随访期间监测了原发性通畅率。在6、12和24个月时,DES和IWS的原发性通畅率分别为100%对62.7%、91.7%对38.8%和62.9%对21.4%。(结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于avg血液透析通路中临床上明显的静脉-移植吻合口狭窄,DES可能比非药物包被IWS更有效。临床影响:药物洗脱支架(DES)因其降低冠状动脉和股腘动脉病变再干预率的功效而被广泛认可。然而,它们在管理失败的血液透析通路中的应用仍未充分探索。这项研究强调了DES在解决血液透析动静脉移植(AVG)中临床上明显的静脉-移植物吻合口狭窄方面的巨大潜力。DES可能是缓解球囊血管成形术后大量立即后坐性狭窄和预防AVG静脉-移植物吻合早期再狭窄的可行选择,为未来的临床实践提供了一种新的治疗途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks. Long-Term Follow-up of Subjects With Iliac Occlusive Disease Treated With the Viabahn VBX Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1