A Small Device May Deliver King-Sized Solutions for Patients With an Exacerbation of Cystic Fibrosis.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS International Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijpe/9184954
P Laird, G MacKenzie, F Gill, C Burr, E McKinnon, M Cooper, E Geelhoed, A Schultz
{"title":"A Small Device May Deliver King-Sized Solutions for Patients With an Exacerbation of Cystic Fibrosis.","authors":"P Laird, G MacKenzie, F Gill, C Burr, E McKinnon, M Cooper, E Geelhoed, A Schultz","doi":"10.1155/ijpe/9184954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The aim is to examine whether using a portable spring-infusor device to deliver antibiotics compared with a standard infusion pump (SIP) translated to (i) improve health outcomes, (ii) reduce the length of stay (LoS), and (iii) reduce cost for treatment of exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). <b>Methods:</b> An observational cohort study was conducted between December 2020 and June 2022 with participants aged 8-19 years admitted for exacerbation of CF. An activity monitor was fitted to participants to measure physical activities for the final 5 days of hospital admission. LoS was measured (days). Group allocation was according to participant preference. Costs were compared between the two groups for LoS, pump cost, and preparation and administration of antibiotics. <b>Results:</b>Twenty-seven of 30 eligible participants were approached, and 22 consented. Data were captured for 16 participants (spring-infusor <i>n</i> = 9): 10 female; mean (SD) age 14.5 (2.1) years. Average step count was negatively associated with age (rho = 0.50), and greater overall in participants using spring-infusors (mean 5324 (SD 2873) steps) versus SIPs (4806 (3116) steps) - mean (95% CI) increase in the spring-infusor group of 3246 (54-6438) for participants of the same age. LoS was longer on average in the SIP group, (mean (SD) LoS: 16.1 (4.3) versus 12.4 (1.7)). The estimated cost saving for a child using a spring-infusor was AUS$12,000. <b>Conclusion:</b>Results from the study suggest that children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF are more active if they receive antibiotics via a spring-infusor device compared with a SIP, and have reduced hospital stay that results in cost saving to the hospital. <i>What is already known?</i> Spring-infusors are small, portable, and mechanical devices to deliver intravenous antibiotics to patients. Spring-infusors are preferred by patients with CF at Perth Children's Hospital Physical activity in children with CF is recommended, including during hospital admissions to promote wellbeing, quality of life, and health outcomes. <i>What this paper adds?</i> Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF may be more active if they receive antibiotics via a portable spring-infusor device compared with a SIP. Children using spring-infusors had reduced hospital stays that results in cost saving to the hospital. Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF step on average, fewer than 5000 steps per day, which is well below recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"2024 ","pages":"9184954"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijpe/9184954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim is to examine whether using a portable spring-infusor device to deliver antibiotics compared with a standard infusion pump (SIP) translated to (i) improve health outcomes, (ii) reduce the length of stay (LoS), and (iii) reduce cost for treatment of exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted between December 2020 and June 2022 with participants aged 8-19 years admitted for exacerbation of CF. An activity monitor was fitted to participants to measure physical activities for the final 5 days of hospital admission. LoS was measured (days). Group allocation was according to participant preference. Costs were compared between the two groups for LoS, pump cost, and preparation and administration of antibiotics. Results:Twenty-seven of 30 eligible participants were approached, and 22 consented. Data were captured for 16 participants (spring-infusor n = 9): 10 female; mean (SD) age 14.5 (2.1) years. Average step count was negatively associated with age (rho = 0.50), and greater overall in participants using spring-infusors (mean 5324 (SD 2873) steps) versus SIPs (4806 (3116) steps) - mean (95% CI) increase in the spring-infusor group of 3246 (54-6438) for participants of the same age. LoS was longer on average in the SIP group, (mean (SD) LoS: 16.1 (4.3) versus 12.4 (1.7)). The estimated cost saving for a child using a spring-infusor was AUS$12,000. Conclusion:Results from the study suggest that children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF are more active if they receive antibiotics via a spring-infusor device compared with a SIP, and have reduced hospital stay that results in cost saving to the hospital. What is already known? Spring-infusors are small, portable, and mechanical devices to deliver intravenous antibiotics to patients. Spring-infusors are preferred by patients with CF at Perth Children's Hospital Physical activity in children with CF is recommended, including during hospital admissions to promote wellbeing, quality of life, and health outcomes. What this paper adds? Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF may be more active if they receive antibiotics via a portable spring-infusor device compared with a SIP. Children using spring-infusors had reduced hospital stays that results in cost saving to the hospital. Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF step on average, fewer than 5000 steps per day, which is well below recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种小型装置可能为囊性纤维化加重患者提供超大解决方案。
目的:目的是检查与标准输液泵(SIP)相比,使用便携式弹簧输液装置输送抗生素是否可以(i)改善健康结果,(ii)缩短住院时间(LoS), (iii)降低治疗囊性纤维化(CF)恶化的成本。方法:在2020年12月至2022年6月期间进行了一项观察性队列研究,参与者年龄为8-19岁,因CF加重而入院。为参与者安装了活动监测仪,以测量入院最后5天的身体活动。测量LoS(天)。根据受试者偏好进行分组。比较两组间LoS、泵费用以及抗生素的制备和给药费用。结果:我们接触了30名符合条件的参与者中的27名,其中22名同意。收集了16名参与者的数据(春季输液器n = 9): 10名女性;平均(SD)年龄为14.5(2.1)岁。平均步数与年龄呈负相关(rho = 0.50),使用弹簧输液器的参与者(平均5324 (SD 2873)步)比sip(4806(3116)步)总体上更大——相同年龄的参与者,弹簧输液器组的平均(95% CI)增加了3246(54-6438)步。SIP组的平均LoS较长(平均(SD) LoS: 16.1(4.3)对12.4(1.7))。使用弹簧输液器的儿童节省的费用估计为1.2万澳元。结论:研究结果表明,与SIP相比,通过弹簧输液装置接受抗生素治疗的CF加重住院儿童更活跃,并且减少了住院时间,从而节省了医院的成本。什么是已知的?弹簧输液器是一种小型、便携的机械装置,用于向患者静脉注射抗生素。建议CF患儿进行体育锻炼,包括住院期间,以促进健康、生活质量和健康结果。这篇文章补充了什么?与SIP相比,通过便携式弹簧输液装置接受抗生素治疗的CF加重住院儿童可能更活跃。使用弹簧输液器的儿童减少了住院时间,从而节省了医院的费用。因CF恶化而住院的儿童平均每天少于5000步,远低于推荐值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Pediatrics is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original researcharticles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pediatric research. The journal accepts submissions presented as an original article, short communication, case report, review article, systematic review, or letter to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Inappropriate Birth Weight for Gestational Age Among Newborns Born at Dessie Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study. A Small Device May Deliver King-Sized Solutions for Patients With an Exacerbation of Cystic Fibrosis. Cell-Free Fetal DNA for Prenatal Screening of Aneuploidies and Autosomal Trisomies: A Systematic Review. Early-Life Risk Factors and Clinical Features of Food Allergy Among Thai Children. Maternal Satisfaction With Children's Vaccination and Its Contributing Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1