In the Eye of the Beholder: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Value of the "Promotion in Place" Competency-Based Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education Pilot.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005928
Dorene F Balmer, Martin V Pusic, Debra F Weinstein, John Patrick T Co, Mary Ellen J Goldhamer
{"title":"In the Eye of the Beholder: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Value of the \"Promotion in Place\" Competency-Based Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education Pilot.","authors":"Dorene F Balmer, Martin V Pusic, Debra F Weinstein, John Patrick T Co, Mary Ellen J Goldhamer","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Competency-based time-variable (CBTV) graduate medical education (GME) has been implemented in Canada, Europe, and the United States, yet its perceived value has not been explored. Promotion in Place (PIP) is a CBTV GME program in which residents graduating early advance to attending status with \"sheltered independence\" until the standard graduation date. This study describes perceived value of CBTV GME and PIP at Mass General Brigham by capturing diverse stakeholder perspectives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this stakeholder analysis using semistructured interviews (June 2022-August 2023), 49 participants were invited (44 representative members and 5 external stakeholders) from 11 GME programs: PIP eligible residents, program directors (PDs), chairs, service chiefs, and external national medical education organization leaders. Authors' understanding of value was informed by Harvey and Green's conceptualization of quality in higher education as \"fit for purpose,\" \"standards monitoring,\" \"transformation,\" and \"value for the money.\" Deductive codes and inductive subcodes captured diverse perspectives of value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 49 invited stakeholders, 34 (69%) were interviewed across 5 stakeholder groups. Nearly all groups cited aspects of PIP that are \"fit for purpose\" as evidence of value; PIP supported \"workforce readiness\" and provided \"sheltered independence\" as intended. External stakeholders, PDs, service chiefs, hospital leadership, and faculty cited value aligning with \"standards monitoring\" (e.g., PIP must maintain or improve patient and resident outcomes). Nearly all groups cited aspects of PIP aligning with \"transformation\" as evidence of value. PIP promoted \"independent decision-making\" and enhanced trainee confidence. Chairs cited aspects of PIP aligning with \"value for the money\" (e.g., \"cost neutral\" as optimal for sustainability and avoidance of \"hidden costs\" such as assessment burden).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding perceptions of PIP and CBTV GME value is critical to engaging diverse stakeholders and extending CBTV GME to more programs and specialties. PIP's transformative nature underscores the added value of CBTV GME.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"331-339"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Competency-based time-variable (CBTV) graduate medical education (GME) has been implemented in Canada, Europe, and the United States, yet its perceived value has not been explored. Promotion in Place (PIP) is a CBTV GME program in which residents graduating early advance to attending status with "sheltered independence" until the standard graduation date. This study describes perceived value of CBTV GME and PIP at Mass General Brigham by capturing diverse stakeholder perspectives.

Method: In this stakeholder analysis using semistructured interviews (June 2022-August 2023), 49 participants were invited (44 representative members and 5 external stakeholders) from 11 GME programs: PIP eligible residents, program directors (PDs), chairs, service chiefs, and external national medical education organization leaders. Authors' understanding of value was informed by Harvey and Green's conceptualization of quality in higher education as "fit for purpose," "standards monitoring," "transformation," and "value for the money." Deductive codes and inductive subcodes captured diverse perspectives of value.

Results: Of the 49 invited stakeholders, 34 (69%) were interviewed across 5 stakeholder groups. Nearly all groups cited aspects of PIP that are "fit for purpose" as evidence of value; PIP supported "workforce readiness" and provided "sheltered independence" as intended. External stakeholders, PDs, service chiefs, hospital leadership, and faculty cited value aligning with "standards monitoring" (e.g., PIP must maintain or improve patient and resident outcomes). Nearly all groups cited aspects of PIP aligning with "transformation" as evidence of value. PIP promoted "independent decision-making" and enhanced trainee confidence. Chairs cited aspects of PIP aligning with "value for the money" (e.g., "cost neutral" as optimal for sustainability and avoidance of "hidden costs" such as assessment burden).

Conclusions: Understanding perceptions of PIP and CBTV GME value is critical to engaging diverse stakeholders and extending CBTV GME to more programs and specialties. PIP's transformative nature underscores the added value of CBTV GME.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁观者眼中:基于胜任力的“就地提拔”时变医学研究生教育试点价值的利益相关者分析
目的:基于能力的时间变量(CBTV)研究生医学教育(GME)已经在加拿大、欧洲和美国实施,但其感知价值尚未探索。就地升学(PIP)是CBTV GME的一个项目,在这个项目中,提前毕业的居民可以在标准毕业日期之前获得“庇护独立”的身份。本研究通过捕获不同利益相关者的观点,描述了布莱根总医院CBTV GME和PIP的感知价值。方法:采用半结构化访谈法(2022年6月- 2023年8月),从11个GME项目中邀请了49名参与者(44名代表成员和5名外部利益相关者):符合PIP条件的住院医师、项目主任(pd)、主席、服务主管和外部国家医学教育组织领导人。作者对价值的理解来自Harvey和Green对高等教育质量的概念化,即“符合目的”、“标准监控”、“转型”和“物有所值”。演绎代码和归纳子代码捕获了不同的价值视角。结果:在49位受邀的利益相关者中,有34位(69%)在5个利益相关者群体中接受了采访。几乎所有的小组都将PIP“符合目的”的方面作为其价值的证据;PIP支持“劳动力准备”,并按预期提供“庇护独立”。外部利益相关者、pd、服务主管、医院领导和教师都提到了与“标准监测”(例如,PIP必须维持或改善患者和住院医生的治疗结果)保持一致的价值。几乎所有的小组都将PIP与“转型”相一致的方面作为价值的证据。PIP提倡“独立决策”,增强学员信心。主席们列举了PIP符合“物有所值”的方面(例如,“成本中性”是可持续性和避免诸如分摊负担等“隐性成本”的最佳选择)。结论:了解PIP和CBTV GME价值的感知对于吸引不同的利益相关者和将CBTV GME扩展到更多的节目和专业至关重要。PIP的变革性强调了CBTV GME的附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Commentary on "Discharged into Clouds". Commentary on "Monet Refuses the Operation". Commentary on The Apothecary from The Saturday Evening Post. Is Tenure Available for Every Clinical Educator? Appraising Simulation-Based Approaches to Addressing Microaggressions in the Clinical Environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1