Methadone clinic staff perceptions of trauma-informed and patient-centered care: the role of individual staff characteristics.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1186/s13722-024-00501-6
Beth E Meyerson, Linnea B Linde-Krieger, Gregory A Carter, Allison J Huff, Benjamin R Brady, Richard A Crosby, Jennifer De La Rosa, Allie Allison, Mohammad Barakat, Michael Pava, Mark Schaefer
{"title":"Methadone clinic staff perceptions of trauma-informed and patient-centered care: the role of individual staff characteristics.","authors":"Beth E Meyerson, Linnea B Linde-Krieger, Gregory A Carter, Allison J Huff, Benjamin R Brady, Richard A Crosby, Jennifer De La Rosa, Allie Allison, Mohammad Barakat, Michael Pava, Mark Schaefer","doi":"10.1186/s13722-024-00501-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>U.S. policy intervention to increase methadone treatment accommodations during COVID did not result in national adoption of the new patient-centered treatment practices. Staff-level interventions may facilitate adoption of these treatment practices, but this will depend upon knowledge about staff level characteristics and beliefs. Currently, the role of clinic staff characteristics, beliefs about patient-centeredness, and perceptions about the need for treatment practice change is unknown. This study explored the relationship between opioid treatment program staff characteristics, work roles and staff beliefs to identify opportunities for future staff-level treatment practice change interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Staff of three Arizona opioid treatment programs were surveyed (n = 40) from April 11-22, 2023 using a hybrid online survey method. The 161 survey items required less than 30 min to complete. Pearson point biserial correlation coefficients assessed the covariation between staff beliefs, staff characteristics and staff work roles. Perception of the clinic as person-centered was a potential proxy indicator for staff awareness of discontinuity between the clinic's person-centeredness and person-centered approaches to methadone treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among staff, 47.5% reported lived substance use disorder experience and 27.5% reported lived opioid use disorder experience. Most staff (70%) held at least 1 prior clinic role at the current clinic and 5% had had more than 4 prior roles. Rotation was observed with roles that did not require licensure or degrees. Staff with lived experience with substance use disorder or opioid use disorder treatment reported having more prior roles at the clinic than those without such experience. Abstinence-oriented views were significantly associated with reporting vicarious (work related) trauma symptoms. Those who rated the clinic as significantly more person-centered were staff with lived substance use disorder experience who also held abstinence-oriented views, staff with trauma exposure, and staff with lived opioid use disorder treatment experience who held harm reduction beliefs. In contrast, staff without substance use disorder experience who held harm reduction beliefs perceived the clinic as less person-centered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff beliefs, personal and work characteristics are likely factors in the recognition of need for clinic practice change. How these characteristics function in a clinic culture may also be influenced by clinic staffing patterns. A patient-to-provider pipeline with role cycling was observed and this staffing pattern may also influence shared beliefs of trauma-informed care or clinic person-centeredness. Vicarious trauma may also be an important factor. Larger studies should examine these relationships further to understand mechanisms associated with recognition of need for clinic practice change in order to inform staff-level interventions to increase opioid treatment program patient-centeredness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-024-00501-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: U.S. policy intervention to increase methadone treatment accommodations during COVID did not result in national adoption of the new patient-centered treatment practices. Staff-level interventions may facilitate adoption of these treatment practices, but this will depend upon knowledge about staff level characteristics and beliefs. Currently, the role of clinic staff characteristics, beliefs about patient-centeredness, and perceptions about the need for treatment practice change is unknown. This study explored the relationship between opioid treatment program staff characteristics, work roles and staff beliefs to identify opportunities for future staff-level treatment practice change interventions.

Methods: Staff of three Arizona opioid treatment programs were surveyed (n = 40) from April 11-22, 2023 using a hybrid online survey method. The 161 survey items required less than 30 min to complete. Pearson point biserial correlation coefficients assessed the covariation between staff beliefs, staff characteristics and staff work roles. Perception of the clinic as person-centered was a potential proxy indicator for staff awareness of discontinuity between the clinic's person-centeredness and person-centered approaches to methadone treatment.

Results: Among staff, 47.5% reported lived substance use disorder experience and 27.5% reported lived opioid use disorder experience. Most staff (70%) held at least 1 prior clinic role at the current clinic and 5% had had more than 4 prior roles. Rotation was observed with roles that did not require licensure or degrees. Staff with lived experience with substance use disorder or opioid use disorder treatment reported having more prior roles at the clinic than those without such experience. Abstinence-oriented views were significantly associated with reporting vicarious (work related) trauma symptoms. Those who rated the clinic as significantly more person-centered were staff with lived substance use disorder experience who also held abstinence-oriented views, staff with trauma exposure, and staff with lived opioid use disorder treatment experience who held harm reduction beliefs. In contrast, staff without substance use disorder experience who held harm reduction beliefs perceived the clinic as less person-centered.

Conclusions: Staff beliefs, personal and work characteristics are likely factors in the recognition of need for clinic practice change. How these characteristics function in a clinic culture may also be influenced by clinic staffing patterns. A patient-to-provider pipeline with role cycling was observed and this staffing pattern may also influence shared beliefs of trauma-informed care or clinic person-centeredness. Vicarious trauma may also be an important factor. Larger studies should examine these relationships further to understand mechanisms associated with recognition of need for clinic practice change in order to inform staff-level interventions to increase opioid treatment program patient-centeredness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美沙酮诊所工作人员对创伤知情和以病人为中心的护理的看法:个别工作人员特征的作用。
背景:美国在COVID期间增加美沙酮治疗住宿的政策干预并未导致全国采用新的以患者为中心的治疗实践。工作人员层面的干预可能会促进这些治疗实践的采用,但这将取决于对工作人员层面特征和信念的了解。目前,临床工作人员的特点,关于以病人为中心的信念,以及对治疗实践改变的需要的看法的作用是未知的。本研究探讨了阿片类药物治疗项目工作人员特征、工作角色和工作人员信念之间的关系,以确定未来工作人员层面治疗实践改变干预的机会。方法:采用混合在线调查方法,于2023年4月11日至22日对亚利桑那州三个阿片类药物治疗项目的工作人员(n = 40)进行调查。161个调查项目在30分钟内完成。Pearson点双列相关系数评估了员工信念、员工特征和员工工作角色之间的共变。对诊所以人为中心的感知是员工意识到诊所以人为中心和以人为中心的美沙酮治疗方法之间不连续性的潜在代理指标。结果:47.5%的员工报告有物质使用障碍经历,27.5%的员工报告有阿片类药物使用障碍经历。大多数员工(70%)在目前的诊所至少担任过1个临床角色,5%的员工曾担任过4个以上的临床角色。轮换的角色不需要执照或学位。有物质使用障碍或阿片类药物使用障碍治疗生活经验的工作人员报告说,与没有此类经验的工作人员相比,他们在诊所的先前角色更多。以禁欲为导向的观点与报告替代性(工作相关)创伤症状显著相关。那些认为诊所更以人为中心的人是有物质使用障碍经历的工作人员,他们也持有禁欲导向的观点,有创伤暴露的工作人员,以及有阿片类药物使用障碍治疗经历的工作人员,他们持有减少伤害的信念。相比之下,没有物质使用障碍经验的员工持有减少伤害的信念,认为诊所不太以人为本。结论:员工信念、个人特征和工作特征可能是影响临床实践变革需求认知的因素。这些特征如何在诊所文化中发挥作用也可能受到诊所人员配置模式的影响。观察到一个角色循环的病人到提供者管道,这种人员配置模式也可能影响创伤知情护理或临床以人为本的共同信念。间接创伤也可能是一个重要因素。更大规模的研究应该进一步检查这些关系,以了解与认识到需要改变临床实践相关的机制,以便告知工作人员层面的干预措施,以增加阿片类药物治疗方案以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in treatment effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: a moderation analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Patient characteristics associated with their level of twelve-step attendance prior to entry into treatment for substance use disorders. A stakeholder-driven approach to designing a peer recovery coach role for implementation in community-oriented primary care teams in South Africa. Early findings on home delivery of buprenorphine and retention in treatment for opioid use disorder. Comparison of heroin and fentanyl use in US nationally representative surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1