Robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation in adults after failed primary surgery: technique and outcomes from two centers.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06009-9
Liqing Xu, Xinfei Li, Fangzhou Zhao, Zhihua Li, Guanpeng Han, Wencong Han, Yaming Gu, Bing Wang, Peng Zhang, Wenzhi Gao, Liang Cui, Liqun Zhou, Kunlin Yang, Xuesong Li
{"title":"Robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation in adults after failed primary surgery: technique and outcomes from two centers.","authors":"Liqing Xu, Xinfei Li, Fangzhou Zhao, Zhihua Li, Guanpeng Han, Wencong Han, Yaming Gu, Bing Wang, Peng Zhang, Wenzhi Gao, Liang Cui, Liqun Zhou, Kunlin Yang, Xuesong Li","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06009-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to report our technical experience and mid-term outcomes of robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation in adults following failed primary ureteral reimplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients underwent robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation from December 2020 to May 2022 at double centers. Surgical procedures included anti-reflux dismembered submucosal tunnel reimplantation, anti-reflux dismembered nipple reimplantation, and anti-reflux non-dismembered submucosal tunnel reimplantation. The perioperative variables were prospectively collected, and the outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients underwent 13 robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantations. Anastomotic stenosis was the primary cause of redo surgery, accounting for 83.3% of cases. Additionally, 83.3% of patients had received balloon dilation, stent placement, and other urological treatments after primary surgery. All patients successfully underwent robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. All patients underwent anti-reflux technique, with 9 patients undergoing submucosal tunnel reimplantation (75%) and 3 nipple reimplantation (25%). Psoas hitch was required in eight patients (66.7%). The mean operative time was 129.3±29.0 minutes. The median postoperative hospitalization time was 3.0 (IQR, 3.0, 3.0) days. At a mean follow-up of 15.7±5.9 months, all patients achieved complete success with no severe complication. Two patients (16.7%) still experienced vesicoureteral reflux related symptoms postoperatively, which improved compared to preoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic redo ureteral reimplantation is safe and effective. The success of redo surgery is attributed to preoperative nephrostomy, clearing the fibrous scar surrounding the ureter, appropriate selection of anti-reflux technique, and psoas hitch when needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06009-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to report our technical experience and mid-term outcomes of robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation in adults following failed primary ureteral reimplantation.

Methods: Twelve patients underwent robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation from December 2020 to May 2022 at double centers. Surgical procedures included anti-reflux dismembered submucosal tunnel reimplantation, anti-reflux dismembered nipple reimplantation, and anti-reflux non-dismembered submucosal tunnel reimplantation. The perioperative variables were prospectively collected, and the outcomes were assessed.

Results: Twelve patients underwent 13 robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantations. Anastomotic stenosis was the primary cause of redo surgery, accounting for 83.3% of cases. Additionally, 83.3% of patients had received balloon dilation, stent placement, and other urological treatments after primary surgery. All patients successfully underwent robot-assisted redo ureteral reimplantation without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. All patients underwent anti-reflux technique, with 9 patients undergoing submucosal tunnel reimplantation (75%) and 3 nipple reimplantation (25%). Psoas hitch was required in eight patients (66.7%). The mean operative time was 129.3±29.0 minutes. The median postoperative hospitalization time was 3.0 (IQR, 3.0, 3.0) days. At a mean follow-up of 15.7±5.9 months, all patients achieved complete success with no severe complication. Two patients (16.7%) still experienced vesicoureteral reflux related symptoms postoperatively, which improved compared to preoperatively.

Conclusions: Robotic redo ureteral reimplantation is safe and effective. The success of redo surgery is attributed to preoperative nephrostomy, clearing the fibrous scar surrounding the ureter, appropriate selection of anti-reflux technique, and psoas hitch when needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人初次手术失败后机器人辅助输尿管重植术:来自两个中心的技术和结果。
背景:本研究的目的是报告我们的技术经验和中期结果,机器人辅助输尿管重植术在成人输尿管重植术失败后。方法:2020年12月至2022年5月,12例患者在双中心行机器人辅助输尿管再植术。外科手术包括抗反流肢解的粘膜下隧道再植术、抗反流肢解的乳头再植术和抗反流非肢解的粘膜下隧道再植术。前瞻性收集围手术期变量,并评估结果。结果:12例患者接受了13次机器人辅助输尿管再植术。吻合口狭窄是重做手术的主要原因,占83.3%。此外,83.3%的患者在初次手术后接受了球囊扩张、支架置入术和其他泌尿外科治疗。所有患者均成功接受机器人辅助输尿管再植术,未转开或腹腔镜手术。所有患者均行抗反流技术,其中9例(75%)行粘膜下隧道再植术,3例(25%)行乳头再植术。8例患者(66.7%)需要腰大肌系结。平均手术时间129.3±29.0分钟。术后中位住院时间为3.0 (IQR, 3.0, 3.0) d。平均随访15.7±5.9个月,所有患者均获得完全成功,无严重并发症。2例患者(16.7%)术后仍出现膀胱输尿管反流相关症状,与术前相比有所改善。结论:机器人输尿管再植术安全、有效。重做手术的成功归功于术前肾造口术,清除输尿管周围纤维瘢痕,适当选择抗反流技术,必要时进行腰肌结扎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
Different clusters in patients with lupus podocytopathy identified by clinical-pathological characteristics. Effectiveness of patient education on adherence to treatment regimen and quality of life in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comparison on the efficiency and safety between two morcellators for laser enucleation of the prostate: Piranha versus Cyber Blade. A randomized controlled trial. The "gender-gap" problem of artificial urinary sphincter: the future is robotic. Aquablation vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 150-patients prospective comparative multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1