Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Definitive Radiotherapy for Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Prostate Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pros.24833
Cem Onal, Aysenur Elmali, Gurcan Erbay, Birhan Demirhan, Philip Sutera, Matthew P Deek, Phuoc T Tran, Ozan Cem Guler
{"title":"Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Definitive Radiotherapy for Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer Patients.","authors":"Cem Onal, Aysenur Elmali, Gurcan Erbay, Birhan Demirhan, Philip Sutera, Matthew P Deek, Phuoc T Tran, Ozan Cem Guler","doi":"10.1002/pros.24833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in evaluating Gleason score (GS) 7 tumors before definitive radiotherapy (RT) and to explore its association with clinicopathological factors and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical data of 266 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biopsy-confirmed GS 7 who underwent RT were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment DW-MRI was utilized to measure apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of primary tumors. Treatment outcomes, including biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), were assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the correlation between tumor ADC values, clinicopathological factors, and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumors with a GS of 3 + 4 had significantly higher ADC values than those with a GS of 4 + 3 (0.746 ± 0.150 vs. 0.702 ± 0.157 × 10<sup>-</sup>³ mm²/s; p < 0.001). Median follow-up time was 8.6 years, and the 7-year rates for bDFS and PCSS were 89.1% and 95.3%, respectively. Lower tumor ADC values were significantly correlated with higher GS and increased risk of disease progression. A primary tumor ADC cutoff value of 0.682 × 10<sup>-</sup>³ mm²/s was identified for predicting disease progression. Patients with higher ADC values exhibited significantly better 7-year bDFS rates (92.8% vs. 83.2%; p = 0.02). However, GS 4 + 3 tumors independently predicted poorer bDFS and PCSS outcomes. In the multivariable analysis, only GS 4 + 3 tumor was predictive for worse bDFS and PCSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor ADC values are a reliable biomarker for differentiating between GS 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors in the GS 7 category. Tumors exhibiting lower ADC values have been associated to higher risk factors and an increased likelihood of disease progression, particularly in GS 3 + 4 tumors where GS upgrading could happen.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":"344-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in evaluating Gleason score (GS) 7 tumors before definitive radiotherapy (RT) and to explore its association with clinicopathological factors and treatment outcomes.

Materials and methods: Clinical data of 266 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biopsy-confirmed GS 7 who underwent RT were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment DW-MRI was utilized to measure apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of primary tumors. Treatment outcomes, including biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), were assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the correlation between tumor ADC values, clinicopathological factors, and treatment outcomes.

Results: Tumors with a GS of 3 + 4 had significantly higher ADC values than those with a GS of 4 + 3 (0.746 ± 0.150 vs. 0.702 ± 0.157 × 10-³ mm²/s; p < 0.001). Median follow-up time was 8.6 years, and the 7-year rates for bDFS and PCSS were 89.1% and 95.3%, respectively. Lower tumor ADC values were significantly correlated with higher GS and increased risk of disease progression. A primary tumor ADC cutoff value of 0.682 × 10-³ mm²/s was identified for predicting disease progression. Patients with higher ADC values exhibited significantly better 7-year bDFS rates (92.8% vs. 83.2%; p = 0.02). However, GS 4 + 3 tumors independently predicted poorer bDFS and PCSS outcomes. In the multivariable analysis, only GS 4 + 3 tumor was predictive for worse bDFS and PCSS.

Conclusions: Tumor ADC values are a reliable biomarker for differentiating between GS 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors in the GS 7 category. Tumors exhibiting lower ADC values have been associated to higher risk factors and an increased likelihood of disease progression, particularly in GS 3 + 4 tumors where GS upgrading could happen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估表观扩散系数对Gleason评分7分前列腺癌患者最终放疗预后的影响。
背景:探讨扩散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)在确定放疗(RT)前评估Gleason评分(GS) 7的肿瘤中的应用,并探讨其与临床病理因素和治疗结果的关系。材料与方法:回顾性分析266例活检证实为GS - 7的前列腺癌患者行放射治疗的临床资料。采用预处理DW-MRI测量原发肿瘤的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。评估治疗结果,包括生化无病生存期(bDFS)和前列腺癌特异性生存期(PCSS)。通过统计学分析确定肿瘤ADC值、临床病理因素和治疗结果之间的相关性。结果:GS为3 + 4的肿瘤ADC值明显高于GS为4 + 3的肿瘤ADC值(0.746±0.150 vs. 0.702±0.157 × 10-³mm²/s);P -³mm²/s被确定用于预测疾病进展。ADC值较高的患者表现出更好的7年bDFS率(92.8% vs. 83.2%;p = 0.02)。然而,GS 4 + 3肿瘤独立预测较差的bDFS和PCSS结果。在多变量分析中,只有GS 4 + 3肿瘤可预测较差的bDFS和PCSS。结论:肿瘤ADC值是区分GS 7类中GS 3 + 4和GS 4 + 3肿瘤的可靠生物标志物。显示较低ADC值的肿瘤与较高的危险因素和疾病进展的可能性增加有关,特别是在GS 3 + 4肿瘤中,可能发生GS升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Definitive Radiotherapy for Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer Patients. Comparison of Prognosis and Health-Related Quality of Life Between Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined With External Beam Radiation Therapy and Hormone Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer. ERG and PTEN Role on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Multiparametric MRI Era. Racial Disparities in Future Development of Lethal Prostate Cancer Based on Midlife Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen. Histopathologic Features and Transcriptomic Signatures Do Not Solve the Issue of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Invisible Prostate Cancers: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1